Model Sample Clauses

Model. An electronic copy of the Model; and
Model. The Credit Parties shall have provided the Global Agent a copy of financial projections for the fiscal years 2008 through 2012 which have been prepared taking into account historical levels of business activity, known trends, including general economic trends, and other information, assumptions and estimates considered by management of the Parent and its Subsidiaries to be pertinent thereto, and such Financial Projections shall be satisfactory to the Global Agent.
Model s). The “Model” or “Models” means a simulation model created through the use of the AnyLogic Software and provided to End User hereunder.
Model. The parties are committed to a collaborative process for decision making based on a consensus model. In consensus, consideration is given to all persons who are impacted by the decision. In this process, everyone in the group supports, agrees to, or can live with a particular decision. Each site is required to develop a decision-making matrix based on consensus including identifying:
Model is the model of the POS system that ZOOM receives data from:• NCR Radiant RPOS• Oracle Simphony POS
Model s). The “Model” or “Models” means a simulation model created through the use of the Software.
Model. −We assume a fully connected network of n processors, whose IDs are common knowledge. Each processor has a private coin. Communication channels are au- thenticated, in the sense that whenever a processor sends a message directly to another, the identity of the sender is known to the recipient, but we other- wise make no cryptographic assumptions. We assume a nonadaptive (sometimes called static) adversary. That is, the adversary chooses the set of tn bad proces- sors at the start of the protocol, where t is a constant fraction, namely, 1/3 for any positive constant . The adversary is malicious: bad processors can en- gage in any kind of deviations from the protocol, including false messages and collusion, or crash failures, and bad processors can send any number of mes- sages. Moreover, the adversary chooses the input bits of every processor. The good processors are those that follow the protocol.We consider both synchronous and asynchronous models of communication. In the synchronous model, communication proceeds in rounds; messages are all sent out at the same time at the start of the round, and then received at the same time at the end of the same round; all processors have synchronized clocks. The time complexity is given by the number of rounds. In the asynchronous model, each communication can take an arbitrary and unknown amount of time, and there is no assumption of a joint clock as in the synchronous model. The adver- sary can determine the delay of each message and the order in which they are received. We follow [2] in defining the running time of an asynchronous protocol as the time of execution, where the maximum delay of a message between the time it is sent and the time it is processed is assumed to be one unit.We assume full information: in the synchronous model, the adversary is rush- ing, that is, it can view all messages sent by the good processors in a round before the bad processors send their messages in the same round. In the case of the asynchronous model, the adversary can view any sent message before its delay is determined.
Model. 2.4 Year Built: ________________________________________________________________________ 2.5 Motorcycle Identification Number (VIN): ________________________________________________________________________ 2.6 Odometer Reading: ________________________________________________________________________