March 21 Order Sample Clauses

March 21 Order. 15. The March 21 Order approved NERC’s revision to CMEP section 3.4 to provide that, in addition to NERC and the Commission, governmental authorities in Canada and Mexico with subject matter jurisdiction over reliability may commence an investigation into a U.S.-related matter. The Commission’s approval was on the condition that prior to NERC’s disclosure to such an authority of any information relating to the matter, NERC must notify the Commission of the investigation, any proposed disclosures of information, and procedures to ensure compliance with section 39.7(b)(4) of the Commission’s regulations.12
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
March 21 Order. 76. The March 21 Order required MRO to revise the definition of the term “sub- regional variance,” as it appears in the MRO Standards Development Process Manual. The Commission noted that the MRO manual defined this term, in relevant part, as “[a]n aspect of a Reliability Standard . . . that applies only within a particular regional entity sub-region.” However, the Commission found that this definition could be misinterpreted as allowing exemptions that establish a level of reliability less than that set by the continent-wide Reliability Standard. The Commission noted the Order No 672 discussion regarding regional differences where the Commission stated: As a general matter, we will accept the following two types of regional differences, provided they are otherwise just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential and in the public interest, as required under the statute: (1) a regional difference that is more stringent than the continent-wide Reliability Standard, including a regional difference that addresses matters that the continent-wide Reliability Standard does not; and
March 21 Order. 98. The March 21 Order found that the SERC bylaws do not address or otherwise ensure that the SERC hearing body (as comprised by the SERC board compliance committee, or a designated subset of that committee) satisfies the Commission’s requirements concerning control by industry sectors over a Regional Entity’s decisions. The Commission also found that SERC failed to explain how a subset of the compliance committee, serving as the hearing body, would report to the SERC board. Finally, the Commission found that the SERC bylaws do not provide that the hearing body will decide questions in a hearing by a majority of the votes cast by a quorum.48
March 21 Order. 113. The March 21 Order required that the WECC hearing procedures be revised, at paragraph 1.4.1(b), with respect to WECC compliance staff’s obligation to produce exculpatory evidence.54 Specifically, the Commission required that this obligation be subject to and limited by any applicable privilege and required WECC to explain why this obligation should extend, at paragraph 1.4.1(b)(3), to documents not otherwise discoverable or needed for a complete record. The Commission also directed WECC to clarify the meaning of the term “material” exculpatory evidence in the context of proposed paragraph 1.4.1.
March 21 Order. 81. The March 21 Order stated that it was unclear whether the voting protocols applicable to the NPCC hearing body (NPCC Exhibit D at section 2.0) comply with the Commission’s prior directive that a hearing body render its decisions by a majority of the votes cast by a quorum. The Commission noted that, under the NPCC bylaws, the 39 See 18 C.F.R. § 39.10 (2008). Docket No. RR06-1-016, et al. -28- compliance committee (the entity authorized to serve as the NPCC hearing body) would be required to use the quorum and voting rules applicable to the NPCC board and that board actions, in turn, required the receipt of a two-thirds affirmative majority of the weighted sector votes, i.e., not a simple majority. Accordingly, the Commission directed NPCC to modify the voting rules applicable to the NPCC hearing body.40
March 21 Order. 103. The March 21 Order provided that: With respect to SPP’s annual membership fee, we accept SPP’s statement that this fee is for membership in Southwest Power Pool, Inc. and is not required to participate in Regional Entity activities. To clarify this distinction, we direct SPP to revise its bylaws to explicitly state that membership in the Regional Entity is open to any entity and that SPP will not charge a fee for such participation.[50] 104. With respect to funding, the March 21 Order found that SPP’s proposed funding mechanism, as set forth in Exhibit E, section 5 to the SPP Delegation Agreement, failed to address how the funds collected by SPP for non-statutory expenses will be kept separate from funds collected under FPA section 215. Accordingly, the Commission directed NERC and SPP to establish, at section 5, the procedures necessary to ensure this separation of accounts, or otherwise justify the existing provision.51 50 March 21 Order, 122 FERC ¶ 61,245 at P 213. 51 Id. P 216. Docket No. RR06-1-016, et al. -35- 105. The Commission also stated that it remained concerned regarding the adequacy of the separation of functions between the SPP RTO and SPP Regional Entity. The March 21 Order noted that Commission staff is auditing SPP Regional Entity’s organizational structure and practices, and a final Commission determination regarding the adequacy of the separation of functions between SPP Regional Entity and SPP RTO will remain pending the results of the audit.

Related to March 21 Order

  • DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Contractors and each employee or subcontractor with access to State Data, as defined in the Master Agreement will be required to sign a standard State non-disclosure agreement if there is not already one on file. SCOPE OF WORK PURPOSE

  • MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Re: Nurses Committee The parties acknowledge that the Registered Nurses’ Union Newfoundland and Labrador (RNUNL) have indicated that they have issues of concern unique to Nurses who live and work in Labrador and that the RNUNL will attempt to address these concerns through a committee which will be established subsequent to these negotiations.

  • Short Sales and Confidentiality Prior To The Date Hereof Other than consummating the transactions contemplated hereunder, such Purchaser has not directly or indirectly, nor has any Person acting on behalf of or pursuant to any understanding with such Purchaser, executed any purchases or sales, including Short Sales, of the securities of the Company during the period commencing from the time that such Purchaser first received a term sheet (written or oral) from the Company or any other Person representing the Company setting forth the material terms of the transactions contemplated hereunder until the date hereof (“Discussion Time”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of a Purchaser that is a multi-managed investment vehicle whereby separate portfolio managers manage separate portions of such Purchaser's assets and the portfolio managers have no direct knowledge of the investment decisions made by the portfolio managers managing other portions of such Purchaser's assets, the representation set forth above shall only apply with respect to the portion of assets managed by the portfolio manager that made the investment decision to purchase the Securities covered by this Agreement. Other than to other Persons party to this Agreement, such Purchaser has maintained the confidentiality of all disclosures made to it in connection with this transaction (including the existence and terms of this transaction).

  • LETTER OF INTENT You can reduce the sales charge you pay on Class A shares by investing a certain amount over a 13-month period. Please indicate the total amount you intend to invest over the next 13-months. □ $50,000 □ $100,000 □ $250,000 □ $500,000 □ $1,000,000 or more Rights of Accumulation If you already own Class A shares of the Sierra Mutual Funds, you may already be eligible for a reduced sales charge on Class A share purchases. Please provide the eligible account number(s) below to qualify (if eligible). Account No. Account No. □ Net Asset Value (NAV). I have read the prospectus and qualify for a complete waiver of the sales charge on Class A shares. Registered representatives may complete the Dealer Information section as proof of eligibility. Reason for Waiver:

  • Term of Letters of Understanding All central letters of understanding appended to this agreement, or entered into after the execution of this agreement shall, unless otherwise stated therein, form part of the collective agreement, run concurrently with it, and have the same termination date as the agreement.

  • Side Letter The letter from the Borrower to the Agent dated July 17, 2000 that was executed in connection with the Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect and shall be a Loan Document.

  • What Will Happen After We Receive Your Letter When we receive your letter, we must do two things:

  • Attachment; Levy; Restraint on Business (a) (i) The service of process seeking to attach, by trustee or similar process, any funds of Borrower or of any entity under the control of Borrower (including a Subsidiary), or (ii) a notice of lien or levy is filed against any of Borrower’s assets by any Governmental Authority, and the same under subclauses (i) and (ii) hereof are not, within ten (10) days after the occurrence thereof, discharged or stayed (whether through the posting of a bond or otherwise); provided, however, no Credit Extensions shall be made during any ten (10) day cure period; or

  • Short Sales and Confidentiality After The Date Hereof Each Purchaser severally and not jointly with the other Purchasers covenants that neither it nor any Affiliate acting on its behalf or pursuant to any understanding with it will execute any Short Sales during the period commencing at the Discussion Time and ending at the time that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are first publicly announced as described in Section 4.6. Each Purchaser, severally and not jointly with the other Purchasers, covenants that until such time as the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are publicly disclosed by the Company as described in Section 4.6, such Purchaser will maintain the confidentiality of all disclosures made to it in connection with this transaction (including the existence and terms of this transaction). Each Purchaser understands and acknowledges, severally and not jointly with any other Purchaser, that the Commission currently takes the position that coverage of short sales of shares of the Common Stock “against the box” prior to the Effective Date of the Registration Statement with the Securities is a violation of Section 5 of the Securities Act, as set forth in Item 65, Section A, of the Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations, dated July 1997, compiled by the Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Corporation Finance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Purchaser makes any representation, warranty or covenant hereby that it will not engage in Short Sales in the securities of the Company after the time that the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are first publicly announced as described in Section 4.6. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of a Purchaser that is a multi-managed investment vehicle whereby separate portfolio managers manage separate portions of such Purchaser's assets and the portfolio managers have no direct knowledge of the investment decisions made by the portfolio managers managing other portions of such Purchaser's assets, the covenant set forth above shall only apply with respect to the portion of assets managed by the portfolio manager that made the investment decision to purchase the Securities covered by this Agreement.

  • Happen After We Receive Your Letter When we receive your letter, we must do two things:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.