INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES Sample Clauses

INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. 21.1 Any employee who receives a personal injury arising out of, and, in the course of his/her employment, shall report such injury to his/her immediate supervisor, in accordance with the provisions of the Michigan Workers Compensation Act.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. One frequently recurring topic which has received some unusual treatment under Pennsylvania law involves the question of whether an additional insured is entitled to liability coverage in connection with bodily injury claims on the part of the named insured’s employees. This is not an issue of workers’ compensation immunity, but is instead concerned with the question of whether coverage is barred with respect to such claims under what is commonly known as an “employer’s liability exclusion”, typically indicating that the insurance does not apply to “bodily injury to an employee of the insured.” Most courts have held that such exclusions would not apply to additional insureds in cases involving injury to employees of the named insured since the phrase “the insured” would be viewed as referring only to the insured seeking coverage. Thus, because an injured employee of the named insured is not an employee of the additional insured, the exclusionary language would not apply to the additional insured. See, e.g.,
INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. One frequently recurring topic which has received some unusual treatment under Pennsylvania law involves the question of whether an additional insured is entitled to liability coverage in connection with bodily injury claims on the part of the named insured’s employees. This is not an issue of workers’ compensation immunity, but is instead concerned with the question of whether coverage is barred with respect to such claims under what is commonly known as an “employer’s liability exclusion”, typically indicating that the insurance does not apply to “bodily injury to an employee of the insured.” Most courts have held that such exclusions would not apply to additional insureds in cases involving injury to employees of the named insured since the phrase “the insured” would be viewed as referring only to the insured seeking coverage. Thus, because an injured employee of the named insured is not an employee of the additional insured, the exclusionary language would not apply to the additional insured. See, e.g., Erdo v. Torcon Construction Co., 275 N.J.Super. 117, 645 A.2d 806 (App.Div. 1994); Sacharko v. Center Equities Ltd. Partnership, 479 A.2d 1219 (Xxxx.Xxx. 1984); Diamond International Corp. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 712 F.2d 1498 (1st Cir. 1983).
INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. NeoRx agrees that, in the event of a personal injury to a NeoRx employee in the course of his/her employment, NeoRx or its insurance carrier will be responsible for worker's compensation payments to such employee. I3 agrees that, in the event of a personal injury to a I3 employee in the course of his/her employment, I3 or its insurance carrier will be responsible for worker's compensation payments to such employee.
INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. One frequently litigated issue for many years in Pennsylvania was the question of whether an additional insured is entitled to liability coverage with respect to injuries suffered by a named insured’s employees, the question being whether such coverage is barred by the “Employer’s Liability” exclusion, typically indicating that the insurance does not apply to “bodily injury to an employee of the insured.”
INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES. One frequently recurring topic which has received some unusual treatment under Pennsylvania law involves the question of whether an additional insured is entitled to liability coverage in connection with bodily injury claims on the part of the named insured’s employees. This is not an issue of workers’ compensation immunity, but is instead concerned with the question of whether coverage is barred with respect to such claims under what is commonly known as an “Employer’s Liability” exclusion, typically indicating that the insurance does not apply to “bodily injury to an employee of the insured.”

Related to INJURIES TO EMPLOYEES

  • Notification to Employees ‌ The Employer will inform new, transferred, promoted, or demoted employees in writing prior to appointment into positions included in the bargaining unit(s) of the Union’s exclusive representation status. Upon appointment to a bargaining unit position, the Employer will furnish the employees with membership materials provided by the Union. The Employer will inform employees in writing if they are subsequently appointed to a position that is not in a bargaining unit.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.