HBP Governance: Underlying Factors and Principles Sample Clauses

HBP Governance: Underlying Factors and Principles. The HBP has evolved considerably since the Project was accepted by the European Commission (EC) in 2012. Originally conceived as a straightforward EC-funded, single- consortium research project under FP7 rules, albeit on a larger scale than usual and with a longer timeframe, it has evolved into a broader, more complex Flagship Initiative, with an EC-funded Core Project (equivalent to the original consortium) plus Member State-funded Partnering Projects. Whatever the future evolution of the HBP, it will remain a science- driven project. In addition, the goal of the HBP is now shifting more explicitly in the direction of building an enduring European scientific infrastructure. Given that EU infrastructure projects are funded and managed rather differently from research projects, this shift has had a profound influence on the new HBP governance arrangements outlined here. The HBP governance should also ensure a clear “separation of powers” (see next section below), to implement the principle that the people who decide the allocation of money within the Project should not be the ones who are responsible for spending it. Finally, the HBP should ensure that its governance structure is transparent and simple, fairly represents Partner organizations, funders and other stakeholders, and provides adequate accountability to all these parties, as well as including appropriate mechanisms for resolving conflicts. In addressing the governance imperatives outlined above, the HBP also had to take into account the fact that EC-funded projects operate under different rules and expectations from those funded by Member States. Because of the complexity of this challenge, the HBP formed an external advisory Governance Working Group (GWG), comprising the heads of various large EU or Member State research infrastructure bodies, such as the CEA (France), CERN, EMBL, ESA, ESRF, ESFRI, Helmholtz (Germany) and NHS (UK). The GWG unequivocally advised the HBP to adopt a single governance structure, built around a European infrastructure model, such as the European Research Infrastructure Consortium (XXXX) framework. Described below is the HBP’s new governance structure. Central to this is the creation of a Legal Entity, to assume the role of Coordinator for the HBP and assure the continuity of the HBP as a major European scientific research infrastructure. The description starts with the arrangements envisaged once the HBP Legal Entity is operational. However, the Legal Entity cannot b...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to HBP Governance: Underlying Factors and Principles

  • Definitions and Principles of Interpretation The following definitions in clause 1.1 shall be replaced as follows:

  • Objectives and Principles Article 1

  • Basic Principles The Electrical Contractor and the Union have a common and sympathetic interest in the Electrical Industry. Therefore, a working system and harmonious relations are necessary to improve the relationship between the Employer, the Union and the Public. Progress in industry demands a mutuality of confidence between the Employer and the Union. All will benefit by continuous peace and by adjusting any differences by rational common-sense methods.

  • Governing Principles 1. The implementation of this Memorandum of Understanding shall in all aspects be governed by the Regulation and subsequent amendments thereof.

  • Principles of Interpretation The following principles of interpretation apply to this Settlement Agreement:

  • Statement of Basic Principles A. Every employee covered by this Agreement shall have the right to present grievances in accordance with these procedures, with or without representation. Nothing contained in this Article or elsewhere in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent any individual teacher from discussing a problem with the Administration and having it adjusted without intervention or representation of organization representatives, provided that the Union has been given the opportunity to be present at such adjustment.

  • Cost Principles The Subrecipient shall administer its program in conformance with 2 CFR Part 200, et al; (and if Subrecipient is a governmental or quasi-governmental agency, the applicable sections of 24 CFR 85, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments,”) as applicable. These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

  • General Principles 9.2.1 Each Party shall implement its tasks in accordance with the Consortium Plan and shall bear sole responsibility for ensuring that its acts within the Project do not knowingly infringe third party property rights.

  • XXXXXXXX FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRINCIPLES In accordance with the XxxXxxxx Fair Employment Principles (Chapter 807 of the Laws of 1992), the Contractor hereby stipulates that the Contractor either (a) has no business operations in Northern Ireland, or (b) shall take lawful steps in good faith to conduct any business operations in Northern Ireland in accordance with the XxxXxxxx Fair Employment Principles (as described in Section 165 of the New York State Finance Law), and shall permit independent monitoring of compliance with such principles.

  • Guiding Principles This Agreement shall create a liberal, facilitative, transparent and competitive investment environment in ASEAN by adhering to the following principles:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.