Formal Teaching Review Sample Clauses

Formal Teaching Review. 11:02 Particular teaching performance levels by Part-Time Contract Academic Staff are expected by the University, by colleagues, and by students. Such performance is evaluated for all class and laboratory instruction through the formal teaching review process and through the use of Student Evaluations of Teaching. For purposes of this article, “teaching” includes activities performed by members of the bargaining unit either in a studio, classroom or laboratory, through correspondence, through distance education, directed reading, or through the use of technologically assisted instruction. Documentation of teaching performance shall be kept in the member’s personnel file.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Formal Teaching Review. Particular teaching performance levels by ESL Program Employees are expected by the University and the students. Such performance is evaluated for all class instruction through the Formal Teaching Review process and through the use of a student assessment tool. For purposes of this article, “teaching” includes activities performed by the ESL instructors of the bargaining unit, either in a classroom or on field trips or through technologically assisted instruction. Documentation of teaching performance shall be kept in the member’s personnel file.
Sample 1Sample 2
Formal Teaching Review. Formal teaching reviews will be conducted by the University to administer the ROFR process or to otherwise evaluate performance. Particular teaching performance by ESL Instructors is expected by the University and the students. Such performance is evaluated for all class instruction through the use of a student assessment tool and potentially through the Formal Teaching Review process. For purposes of this article, “teaching” includes activities performed by the ESL instructors of the bargaining unit, either in a classroom or on field trips or through technologically assisted instruction. Documentation of teaching performance shall be kept in the ESL Instructor’s personnel file.
Sample 1
Formal Teaching Review. Formal teaching reviews will be conducted by the ESL Program Manager or designate for all ESL Instructors to administer the ROFR process (for Term ESL Instructors) or to otherwise evaluate performance. Particular teaching performance by ESL Instructors is expected by the University and the students. Such performance is evaluated for all class instruction through the use of a student assessment tool and potentially through the Formal Teaching Review process. For purposes of this article, “teaching” includes activities performed by the ESL instructors, either in a classroom or on field trips or through technologically assisted instruction. Documentation of teaching performance shall be kept in the ESL Instructor’s personnel file.
Sample 1

Related to Formal Teaching Review

  • Salary Review All salaries below the maximum of a band shall be reviewed annually.

  • Annual Salary Review In December of each year throughout the TERM, the annual salary of the EMPLOYEE shall be reviewed by the Boards of Directors of the EMPLOYERS and shall be set, effective January l of the following year, at an amount not less than $106,500, based upon the EMPLOYEE'S individual performance and the overall profitability and financial condition of the EMPLOYERS (hereinafter referred to as the "ANNUAL REVIEW"). The results of the ANNUAL REVIEW shall be reflected in the minutes of the Boards of Directors of the EMPLOYERS.

  • Teaching Load Full teaching assignments shall normally include 12 course credit hours of scheduled teaching per academic quarter. A reassignment of duty, for the equivalent of 3 or 4 credit course, shall be provided during one term of the first academic year to all newly hired tenure track faculty to further their teaching, scholarship and service and to encourage faculty retention. Wherever possible the University will endeavor to arrange teaching schedules that avoid excessive numbers of preparations and recognize evening and/or off-campus assignments. Class sizes will be established and monitored by the appropriate academic xxxx in consultation with division chairs and affected faculty each term. The following equivalencies will be used in determining teaching assignments:

  • TEACHING HOURS AND TEACHING LOAD A. As professionals, teachers are expected to devote to their assignments the time necessary to meet their responsibilities, but they shall not be required to “clock in or clock out” by hours and minutes. Teachers shall indicate their presence for duty by placing their signature and time in the proper column of the faculty “sign-in” roster.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Utilization Review We review health services to determine whether the services are or were Medically Necessary or experimental or investigational ("Medically Necessary"). This process is called Utilization Review. Utilization Review includes all review activities, whether they take place prior to the service being performed (Preauthorization); when the service is being performed (concurrent); or after the service is performed (retrospective). If You have any questions about the Utilization Review process, please call the number on Your ID card. The toll-free telephone number is available at least 40 hours a week with an after-hours answering machine. All determinations that services are not Medically Necessary will be made by: 1) licensed Physicians; or 2) licensed, certified, registered or credentialed health care professionals who are in the same profession and same or similar specialty as the Provider who typically manages Your medical condition or disease or provides the health care service under review. We do not compensate or provide financial incentives to Our employees or reviewers for determining that services are not Medically Necessary. We have developed guidelines and protocols to assist Us in this process. Specific guidelines and protocols are available for Your review upon request. For more information, call the number on Your ID card or visit Our website at xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx.

  • Program Review The Contracting Officer or other authorized government representative may hold semi- annual program review meetings. Such meetings will be held via telecom or video teleconferencing. However, the Government reserves the right to request a meeting in person. The meetings will include all BPA holders, representatives from prospective customer agencies, a combination of current and prospective customer agencies, or individual BPA holders. Some Federal Government Agencies and any approved State, Local and Tribal agencies may establish a central program management function. Such users may require their primary suppliers to participate in agency program review meetings on a periodic basis, at no additional cost to the Government.

  • SALARY DETERMINATION FOR EMPLOYEES IN ADULT EDUCATION PCA Article B.3 does not apply in School District No. 34 (Abbotsford).

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.