FINALIZATION OF THE EVALUATION CYCLE Sample Clauses

FINALIZATION OF THE EVALUATION CYCLE. 1. Each evaluation will result in a final summative rating of “Accomplished,” “Skilled,” “Developing,” or “Ineffective.” The final summative rating is based on a holistic review of all seven (7) dimensions of the Ohio School Counselor Evaluation System. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths and performance deficiencies, if any, of the counselor evaluated. The evaluator shall note all data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. No later than May 10, the evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator and then signed by the counselor to verify notification that the evaluation will be placed on file. The counselor's signature should not be construed as evidence that the counselor agrees with the contents of the evaluation report.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
FINALIZATION OF THE EVALUATION CYCLE. Each evaluation will result in a final summative rating of “Accomplished,” “Skilled,” “Developing,” or “Ineffective.” The final summative rating is based on a holistic review of all seven (7) dimensions of the Ohio School Counselor Evaluation System. The score shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) area of the evaluation has a higher importance than any other, except that any area marked N/A shall not have a negative impact on the final summative rating. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths and performance deficiencies, if any, of the counselor evaluated. The evaluator shall note all data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. No later than May 10, the evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator and then signed by the counselor to verify notification that the evaluation will be placed on file. The counselor’s signature should not be construed as evidence that the counselor agrees with the contents of the evaluation report. The counselor shall have the right to make a written response to the evaluation and to have it attached to the evaluation report to be placed in the counselor’s personnel file.
FINALIZATION OF THE EVALUATION CYCLE. 1. Each evaluation will result in a final summative rating of “Accomplished,” “Skilled,” “Developing,” or “Ineffective.” The final summative rating is based on a holistic review of all seven (7) dimensions of the Ohio School Counselor Evaluation System. The score shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) area of the evaluation has a higher importance than any other. The evaluation shall acknowledge the performance strengths and performance deficiencies, if any, of the counselor evaluated. The evaluator shall note the data used to support the conclusions reached in the formal evaluation report. No later than May 10, the evaluation report shall be signed by the evaluator and then signed by the counselor to verify notification that the evaluation will be placed on file. The counselor's signature should not be construed as evidence that the counselor agrees with the contents of the evaluation report.

Related to FINALIZATION OF THE EVALUATION CYCLE

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Implementation of Strategic Plan Goals This Agreement supports the County’s Strategic Plan, Goal 1, Operational Effectiveness/Fiscal Sustainability. This Agreement will provide revenue reimbursement to the Department for services rendered.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.