Design of Experiment Sample Clauses

Design of Experiment. 2. Executing the Experiment 3. Analysis & feedback • Analysis of the results of the Experiment • Feedback on user experience • Recommendations for improvements and/or future extensions of ORCA software platforms and testbeds
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design of Experiment. To study this problem, we use the design of experiment methodology [19] to extract the key factors in the process. The design of experiment can also draw out the interactions of two or more factors. To plan a two-level full factorial design of experiment, all the factor have to be determined. All the costs have to be considered: storage cost, and for each supplier purchasing cost and setup cost. The contract parameters are Li, Ui, Qi and Ri for each supplier i. Assuming that the demands are generated by a normal law, the mean µ and the variance σ are also factors of the model. ∞ In this experiment two suppliers are considered, namely A and B. The contract defined by L, U, Q and R is between the supplier A and the retailer. The contract with the supplier B does not constrain the order quantities nor the order frequency, i.e. Q = 0, R = T , L = 0 and U = , thus B’s purchasing cost is greater. Since the demands must be satisfied, and the total costs are minimized, supplier A’s purchasing costs can be discarded. Both suppliers share the same setup costs. The two-level full factorial design of experiment parameter values are summarized in Table 1. parameter level 1 level 2 R maximum number of periods between two orders from supplier A 3 T Q minimum number of periods between two orders from supplier A 0 3 U maximum amount in one order from supplier A L minimum order quantity for the supplier A 0 30 σ demand variance 2 10 µ demand mean 5 20 f setup production cost for both suppliers 2 10 c supplier B unit production cost 0.1 4 h storage cost 0.1 1 Since 9 parameters are studied, 29 parameter combinations have to be performed. For each parameter combination (referred to as sets herein), 25 instances are generated and solved. Solving a single instance takes less than 2 seconds, but considering the number of instances is 12800, the whole experiment takes about 5 hours to compute.
Sample 1
Design of Experiment. This TQAPP will verify the performance of the Formula 5 coating submitted by Evermore Paints and Coatings A mean value and variance (or standard deviation) will be reported for each critical response factor, and a default 95% confidence limit will be applied. This verification test will consist of five runs with two racks of eight panels in a single row per run; therefore, a total of eighty panels will be coated and used for analysis of the coatings performance characteristics. The statistical analyses for all response factors will be carried out using Minitab statistical software.
Sample 1
Design of Experiment. 2. Executing the Experiment 3. Analysis & feedback • Analysis of the results of the Experiment • Feedback on user experience • Recommendations for improvements and/or future extensions of the FLAME platform and infrastructure
Sample 1

Related to Design of Experiment

  • Design Review At appropriate stages of design, documented reviews of the design results shall be planned and conducted. Participants at each Design Review shall include representatives of all functions concerned with the design stage being reviewed, as well as other specialist personnel, as required. Records of such reviews shall be maintained. Any computer software used to perform alternative calculations or verify clearances through the use of scale models or computer-aided design and drafting (CADD) techniques shall be validated before the use of the application, with validation documented in accordance with Section 2.2.15. In addition, at each submittal to IFA for review, Developer shall provide hand calculations that validate any calculations performed by computer software.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Evaluation Software If the Software is an evaluation version or is provided to You for evaluation purposes, then, unless otherwise approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor, Your license to use the Software is limited solely for internal evaluation purposes in non-production use and in accordance with the terms of the evaluation offering under which You received the Software, and expires 90 days from installation (or such other period as may be indicated within the Software). Upon expiration of the evaluation period, You must discontinue use of the Software, return to an original state any actions performed by the Software, and delete the Software entirely from Your system and You may not download the Software again unless approved in writing by an authorized representative of Licensor. The Software may contain an automatic disabling mechanism that prevents its use after a certain period of time. RESTRICTIONS

  • SOURCE CODE ESCROW FOR LICENSED PRODUCT If Source Code or Source Code escrow is offered by either Contractor or Product manufacturer or developer to any other commercial customers, Contractor shall either: (i) provide Licensee with the Source Code for the Product; or (ii) place the Source Code in a third party escrow arrangement with a designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with a standard escrow agreement acceptable to the State; or (iii) will certify to the State that the Product manufacturer/developer has named the State, acting by and through the Authorized User, and the Licensee, as a named beneficiary of an established escrow arrangement with its designated escrow agent who shall be named and identified to the State and Licensee, and who shall be directed to release the deposited Source Code in accordance with the terms of escrow. Source Code, as well as any corrections or enhancements to such source code, shall be updated for each new release of the Product in the same manner as provided above and such updating of escrow shall be certified to the State in writing. Contractor shall identify the escrow agent upon commencement of the Contract term and shall certify annually that the escrow remains in effect in compliance with the terms of this clause. The State may release the Source Code to Licensees under this Contract who have licensed Product or obtained services, who may use such copy of the Source Code to maintain the Product.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Design Team The Design Professional represents that it has or will secure at its own expense, all personnel required in the performance of this Contract, except for personnel required to be furnished by the Owner. The Design Professional’s personnel shall not be employees of the Owner. . The Design Professional further represents that all of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Design Professional or under its supervision, or by subconsultants under its supervision, as applicable. All personnel so engaged shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under State or local law to perform such services.

  • For Product Development Projects and Project Demonstrations  Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name.  Estimated or actual energy and cost savings, and estimated statewide energy savings once market potential has been realized. Identify all assumptions used in the estimates.  Greenhouse gas and criteria emissions reductions.  Other non-energy benefits such as reliability, public safety, lower operational cost, environmental improvement, indoor environmental quality, and societal benefits.  Data on potential job creation, market potential, economic development, and increased state revenue as a result of the project.  A discussion of project product downloads from websites, and publications in technical journals.  A comparison of project expectations and performance. Discuss whether the goals and objectives of the Agreement have been met and what improvements are needed, if any.

  • Contractor Sensitive Information 17.1 The Authority must:

  • CONTRACTOR TO PACKAGE DELIVERABLES The Contractor will package deliverables in accordance with good commercial practice and shall include a packing list showing the description of each item, the quantity and unit price unless otherwise provided in the Specifications or Supplemental Terms and Conditions, each shipping container shall be clearly and permanently marked as follows: (a) The Contractor's name and address, (b) the City’s name, address and purchase order or purchase release number and the price agreement number if applicable, (c) Container number and total number of containers, e.g. box 1 of 4 boxes, and (d) the number of the container bearing the packing list. The Contractor shall bear cost of packaging. Deliverables shall be suitably packed to secure lowest transportation costs and to conform to all the requirements of common carriers and any applicable specification. The City's count or weight shall be final and conclusive on shipments not accompanied by packing lists.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.