DESIGN COMPUTATION REVIEW AND COORDINATION CHECKING Sample Clauses

DESIGN COMPUTATION REVIEW AND COORDINATION CHECKING. Compile final project calculations and computations into a design notebook. All calculations shall be stamped and signed by the appropriate, responsible, licensed engineer. Calculation sheets shall indicate person responsible for the independent calculation/plan check. Only computations relating to final designed facilities are to be included in the design notebook. Perform QA/QC checking on design drawings, prior to submittal to the CITY, to verify drafting accuracy. The final design drawings shall be signed by both the design engineer and the engineer who performed the QA/QC checking. Perform coordination checks to verify consistency between disciplines and facilities. The CONSULTANT shall comply with the requirements described in Chapter 12, Volume 1 of the CWP Guidelines. It is the CONSULTANT's responsibility to review the specified Guidelines and determine if changes or deviations from the Guidelines are warranted. If changes to the Guidelines are determined to be needed, the CONSULTANT shall accommodate the changes at no cost to the City and provide the City with electronic and hard copy of the changes.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DESIGN COMPUTATION REVIEW AND COORDINATION CHECKING. ‌ Compile final project calculations and computations into a design notebook. All calculations shall be stamped and signed by the appropriate, responsible, licensed engineer. Calculation sheets shall indicate person responsible for the independent calculation/plan check. Only computations relating to final designed facilities are to be included in the design notebook. Perform QA/QC checking on design drawings, prior to submittal to the CITY, to verify drafting accuracy. The final design drawings shall be signed by both the design engineer and the engineer who performed the AQ/QC checking. Perform coordination checks to verify consistency between disciplines and facilities. The CONSULTANT shall comply with the requirements described in Chapter 12, Volume 1 of the CWP Guidelines.
Sample 1

Related to DESIGN COMPUTATION REVIEW AND COORDINATION CHECKING

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES A. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by AGREEMENT, shall be reviewed by LOCAL AGENCY’S Chief Financial Officer.

  • Project Implementation Manual The Recipient, through the PCU, shall: (i) take all action required to carry out Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4 (ii) of the Project in accordance with the provisions and requirements set forth or referred to in the Project Implementation Manual; (ii) submit recommendations to the Association for its consideration for changes and updates of the Project Implementation Manual as they may become necessary or advisable during Project implementation in order to achieve the objective of Parts 1.1, 1.3, 1.4, 2, 3.1(b), 3.2, 3.3 and 4(ii) of the Project; and (iii) not assign, amend, abrogate or waive the Project Implementation Manual or any of its provisions without the Association’s prior agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any of the provisions of the Project Implementation Manual is inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail and govern.

  • Design Professional Contract The Contract between the Owner and the Design Professional for the design of the Project.

  • TIMELINESS OF BILLING SUBMISSION The parties agree that timeliness of billing is of the essence to this Contract and recognize that the City is on a fiscal year. All xxxxxxxx for dates of service prior to July 1 must be submitted to the City no later that the first Friday in August of the same year.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Program Overview A. Goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The Choice Neighborhoods Program employs a comprehensive approach to neighborhood transformation. The program transforms neighborhoods of concentrated poverty into mixed-income neighborhoods of long-term viability by revitalizing severely distressed public and/or assisted housing; improving access to economic opportunities; and investing and leveraging investments in well-functioning services, effective schools and education programs, public assets, public transportation, and improved access to jobs. Choice Neighborhoods ensures that current residents benefit from this transformation by preserving affordable housing in the neighborhood or providing the choice to move to affordable housing in another neighborhood of opportunity. The purpose of this grant is to implement a Transformation Plan that has been developed through a local planning process and furthers the goals of the Choice Neighborhoods Program. The core goals of Choice Neighborhoods are:

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.