Dependent Travel Sample Clauses

Dependent Travel. A. An employee who spends in excess of thirty (30) nights away from his/her home domicile during any twelve (12) consecutive months on authorized ALPA business will be allowed to have a dependent accompany him/her twice during the next twelve (12) months, or two dependents accompanying him/her on one trip. Such trips shall be within the area in which the employee normally travels. Normal expenses, in accordance with existing ALPA policy, will be allowed the dependent, including transportation in an amount not to exceed the cost of an air coach ticket. Such expenses shall be limited to a one-week period commencing with the departure date. Should an employee have two (2) dependents accompany him/her on the same trip, XXXX will pay the lodging for no more than one room. An employee who spends in excess of fifteen (15) nights away from his/her home domicile during any twelve (12) consecutive months on authorized ALPA business will be allowed to have a dependent accompany him/her once during the next twelve (12) consecutive months.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dependent Travel. A. A Staff Employee who spends in excess of thirty (30) nights away from his/her home domicile during any twelve (12) consecutive months on authorized ALPA business will be allowed to have a dependent ac- company him/her twice during the next twelve (12) months, or two dependents accompanying him/her on one trip. Such trips shall be within the continental limits of the United States and Canada and in the area in which the Staff Employee normally travels. Normal ex- penses, in accordance with Section 6.A, will be allowed the depen- dent, including transportation in an amount not to exceed the cost of an air coach ticket. Such expenses shall be limited to a one-week period commencing with the departure date. Should a Staff Employee have two (2) dependents accompany him/her on the same trip, ALPA will pay the lodging for no more than one room. A Staff Employee who spends in excess of fifteen (15) nights away from his/her home domicile during any twelve (12) consecutive months on authorized ALPA business will be allowed to have a dependent accompany him/ her once during the next twelve (12) consecutive months.
Dependent Travel. A. A Staff Employee who spends in excess of thirty (30) nights away from his/her home domicile during any twelve (12) consecutive months on authorized ALPA business will be allowed to have a dependent accompany him/her twice during the next twelve (12) months, or two dependents accompanying him/her on one trip. Such trips shall be within the continental limits of the United States and Canada and in the area in which the Staff Employee normally travels. Normal expenses, in accordance with Section 6.A, will be allowed the dependent, including transportation in an amount not to exceed the cost of an air coach ticket. Such expenses shall be limited to a one-week period commencing with the departure date. Should a Staff Employee have two (2) dependents accompany him/her on the same trip, ALPA will pay the lodging for no more than one room. A Staff Employee who spends in excess of fifteen

Related to Dependent Travel

  • Dependent Child If dependent children are covered under separate plans of more than one person, whether a parent or guardian, benefits for the child will be determined in the following order: • the benefits of the plan covering the parent born earlier in the year will be determined before those of the parent whose birthday (month and day only) falls later in the year; • if both parents have the same birthday, the benefits of the plan that covered the parent longer are determined before those of the plan which covered the other parent for a shorter period of time; • if the other plan does not determine benefits according to the parents' birth dates, but by parents' gender instead, the other plan’s gender rule will determine the order of benefits.

  • Eligible Dependents a. Employee’s Legal Spouse

  • Dependents Eligible dependents for the purposes of this Article are as follows:

  • Dependent Care Assistance Plan An employee may designate an amount per calendar year, from earnings on which there will be no federal income tax withholding for dependent care assistance (as defined in Section 129 of the Internal Revenue Code as amended from time to time.)

  • Retirees The Parties and the Crown agree to meet for the purpose of transitioning retirees currently in board-run benefits plans into a segregated plan administered by the OECTA ELHT via an amendment to the Trust Agreement, based on the following:

  • Dependent Coverage For dependent dental coverage, the Employer contributes an amount equal to the lesser of fifty (50) percent of the dependent premium of the State Dental Plan, or the actual dependent premium of the dental plan chosen by the employee.

  • Dependent Eligibility To be eligible to enroll as a Covered Dependent, a person must be:

  • Dependent Care The College will make available to employees, at their option, an Internal Revenue Service Code Section 129 Dependent Care plan. The plan will be established, administered, and communicated to employees by the State without cost to the employees.

  • Dental Care Benefits (a) The Employer shall provide such regular, full-time seniority employee (and her eligible dependents*) the 100/75/50 Co-Pay Dental Plan in effect January 1, 2014, subject to such terms, conditions, exclusions, limitations, deductibles, co-payments and other provisions of the plan. The Employer shall pay 95% of the illustrated premium cost of such benefits and the employee shall pay the balance. Coverage shall commence on the day following the employee's ninetieth (90th) day of continuous employment.

  • Dependent Child/Parents Separated or Divorced If two or more plans cover a person as a dependent child of divorced or separated parents, the plan responsible to cover benefits for the child will be determined in the following order: • first, the plan of the parent with custody of the child; • then, the plan of the spouse of the parent with custody of the child; and • finally, the plan of the parent not having custody of the child. If the terms of a court decree state that: • one of the parents is responsible for the healthcare expenses of the child, and the entity obligated to pay or provide the parent's benefits under that parent's plan has actual knowledge of those terms, the benefits of that plan are determined first and the benefits of the plan of the other parent are the secondary plan. • both parents share joint custody, without stating that one of the parents is responsible for the healthcare expenses of the child, the plans covering the child will follow the order of benefit determination rules outlined above.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.