Delay in Submission of Deliverables Sample Clauses

Delay in Submission of Deliverables. Subject to the terms set forth in Section 4.12, if the Design-Builder fails to provide any of the deliverables set forth in Exhibit C, the Design-Builder shall pay to the Department liquidated damages in the amount set forth in the Project Information Section of this Agreement for each such deliverable that is not timely submitted.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Delay in Submission of Deliverables. The Contractor acknowledges that the Department is engaging the Contractor to provide an extensive level of preconstruction support services to minimize the potential for cost overruns, schedule delays or the need for extensive Value Engineering/re-design late in the Project and that the certain preconstruction deliverables are key to identify the value of such services. Subject to the terms set forth in Section 4.11, if the Contractor fails to provide any of the deliverables set forth in Exhibit C, the Contractor shall pay to the Department liquidated damages in the amount set forth in the Project Information Section of this Agreement for each such deliverable that is not timely submitted.
Delay in Submission of Deliverables. Subject to the terms set forth in Section 3.1.1.8

Related to Delay in Submission of Deliverables

  • Description of Deliverables The Contractor shall Perform as set forth in Exhibit A.

  • Acceptance of Deliverables The State’s Project Manager shall be responsible for the sign-off acceptance of all Deliverables required and performed/submitted pursuant to this Agreement. Upon successful completion of a Deliverable, Contractor shall provide the State’s Project Manager with a completed Acceptance and Signoff Form (Exhibit E). The State’s Project Manager will apply the standards established in Exhibit D and the acceptance criteria set forth in subparagraph B of this article, as appropriate, to determine the acceptability of the Deliverable provided by Contractor. If the State’s Project Manager rejects the Deliverable, the parties agree to any dispute(s) resulting from such rejection(s) will be resolved as set forth in this article. Acceptance Criteria for Deliverables (“Criteria”) provided by Contractor pursuant to this Agreement include: Timeliness: The Work was provided on time; according to schedule; Completeness: The Deliverable contained all of the, Data, Materials, and features required by the Agreement; and Technical accuracy: The Deliverable complied with the standards of this Agreement, or, if this Agreement lacks a standard for provision of the Work, the currently generally accepted industry standard. Contractor shall provide the Deliverable to the State, in accordance with direction from the Project Manager and as provided for in Exhibit D. The State shall accept the Deliverable, provided that Contractor has delivered the Deliverable in accordance with the Criteria. The State’s Project Manager shall assign the Acceptance and Signoff Form to notify Contractor of the Deliverable’s acceptability. If the State rejects the Deliverable provided, the State’s Project Manager shall submit to Contractor’s Project Manager a written rejection describing in detail the failure of the Deliverable as measured against the Criteria. If the State rejects the Deliverable, then Contractor shall have a period of ten (10) Business Days from receipt of the Notice of rejection to correct the stated failure(s) to conform to the Criteria.

  • Closing Deliverables (a) At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Buyer the following:

  • Post-Closing Deliverables On or before the Closing Date, the applicable Seller shall deliver to Buyer the following:

  • Other Deliverables For any Deliverable that is not a System Deliverable, the applicable Work Order will set forth the acceptance criteria and other testing required for District to evaluate and accept (or, where necessary, reject) such Deliverable; provided, however, that in no case will a Deliverable be accepted by District until District has provided Contractor with District’s written acceptance thereof.

  • Accuracy of Specified Information All applicable information that is furnished in writing by or on behalf of it to the other party and is identified for the purpose of this Section 3(d) in the Schedule is, as of the date of the information, true, accurate and complete in every material respect.

  • Auction Schedule; Method of Submission of Orders (a) The Fund and the Auction Agent shall conduct Auctions for Preferred Shares in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Such schedule may be changed at any time by the Auction Agent with the consent of the Fund, which consent shall not be withheld unreasonably. The Auction Agent shall give notice of any such change to BD. Such notice shall be received prior to the first Auction Date on which any such change shall be effective. Time Event ---- -----

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Updated Information Submission by Developer The updated information submission by the Developer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. Developer shall submit a completed copy of the Large Generating Facility data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. It shall also include any additional information provided to Connecting Transmission Owner for the Interconnection Feasibility Study and Interconnection Facilities Study. Information in this submission shall be the most current Large Generating Facility design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with NYISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Developer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Developer’s data is different from what was originally provided to Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO pursuant to an Interconnection Study Agreement among Connecting Transmission Owner, NYISO and Developer and this difference may be reasonably expected to affect the other Parties’ facilities or the New York State Transmission System, but does not require the submission of a new Interconnection Request, then NYISO will conduct appropriate studies to determine the impact on the New York State Transmission System based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. Such studies will provide an estimate of any additional modifications to the New York State Transmission System, Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities, or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades based on the actual data and a good faith estimate of the costs thereof. The Developer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed. The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of any modifications required by the actual data, including the cost of any required studies.

  • Deliverables Upon satisfactory completion of the work authorization, the Engineer shall submit the deliverables as specified in the executed work authorization to the State for review and acceptance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.