COOPERATION ON FRAUD Sample Clauses

COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 25.1. The Parties agree that they shall cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. The Parties’ fraud minimization procedures are to be cost effective and implemented so as not to unduly burden or harm one party as compared to the other.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 18 Taxes ................................................................................................................................. 18
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. The parties will cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. The p one party as compared to the other. Customer is responsible for all claims, damages and/or costs incurred by CenturyLink as a result of s. Granite Communications LLC CenturyLink Signature Signature Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx Name Printed/Typed Name Printed/Typed Chief Administrative Officer Sr. Dir. Bus. Ops Wholesale Sales Title Title Aug 31, 2022 Aug 31, 2022 Date Date ATTACHMENT 1 LIST OF CENTURYLINK ILEC ENTITIES ENTITY LIST (By State) ALABAMA CenturyTel of Alabama, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink ARIZONA Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC ARKANSAS CenturyLink of Louisiana, LLC CenturyTel of Arkansas, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Central Arkansas, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Missouri, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Mountain Home, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Northwest Arkansas, LLC d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Redfield, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of South Arkansas, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink COLORADO CenturyTel of Colorado, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Eagle, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink (Also provides 8 access lines into Utah from a central office in Colorado) El Paso County Telephone Company d/b/a CenturyLink Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC FLORIDA Embarq Florida, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink GEORGIA Coastal Utilities, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink IDAHO CenturyTel of the Gem State, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Idaho, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC ILLINOIS Gallatin River Communications L.L.C. d/b/a CenturyLink GRC INDIANA CenturyTel of Central Indiana, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Odon, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink United Telephone Company of Indiana, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink IOWA CenturyTel of Xxxxxxx, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Postville, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink Embarq Missouri, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink Qwest Corporation d/b/a CenturyLink QC KANSAS Embarq Missouri, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink United Telephone Company of Eastern Kansas d/b/a CenturyLink United Telephone Company of Kansas d/b/a CenturyLink United Telephone Company of Southcentral Kansas d/b/a CenturyLink LOUISIANA CenturyLink of Louisiana, LLC CenturyTel of South Arkansas, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink MICHIGAN CenturyTel Midwest Michigan, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Michigan, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Northern Michigan, Inc. d/b/a CenturyLink CenturyTel of Upper Michigan, Inc...
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. PACIFIC shall not be liable to CLEC for any fraudulent usage on CLEC’s end users’ accounts. The Parties agree to cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. The Parties’ fraud minimization procedures are to be cost effective and implemented so as not to unduly burden or harm one Party as compared to the other. At a minimum, such cooperation shall include providing to the other Party, upon request, information concerning end users who terminate services to that Party without paying all outstanding charges, when such end user seeks service from the other Party. The Party seeking such information is responsible for securing the end user's permission to obtain such information.
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 21.1. The Parties shall cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. CMRS - AWCC- SC 13 22. TAXES 22.1. 22.2. 22.3. 22.4.
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 17 B. Proprietary Information .......................................... 17 C. Law Enforcement and Civil Process ................................ 18 VII.
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 21.1 The Parties shall cooperate with one another to investigate, minimize and take corrective action in cases of fraud. CenturyLink- 365 Wireless CMRS Interconnection - SC DocuSignEnvelopeID: AF7A500B-6A35-47BE-8658-732F4AFAD7A6
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
COOPERATION ON FRAUD. 11 B. Filing the Agreement ...................................................................11 VI. CHANGES IN SUBSCRIBER CARRIER SELECTIONS ...................................................12

Related to COOPERATION ON FRAUD

  • Cooperation on Safety The Employer and Union will cooperate in continuing and perfecting regulations which will afford adequate protection to employees engaged in hazardous areas.

  • Cooperation on Tax Matters (i) Buyer, the Company and Sellers shall cooperate fully, as and to the extent reasonably requested by the other party, in connection with the filing of Tax Returns pursuant to this Section and any audit, litigation or other proceeding with respect to Taxes. Such cooperation shall include the retention and (upon the other party's request) the provision of records and information which are reasonably relevant to any such audit, litigation or other proceeding and making employees available on a mutually convenient basis to provide additional information and explanation of any material provided hereunder. The Company and Sellers agree (A) to retain all books and records with respect to Tax matters pertinent to the Company relating to any taxable period beginning before the Closing Date until the expiration of the statute of limitations (and, to the extent notified by Buyer or Sellers, any extensions thereof) of the respective taxable periods, and to abide by all record retention agreements entered into with any taxing authority, and (B) to give the other party reasonable written notice prior to transferring, destroying or discarding any such books and records and, if the other party so requests, the Company or Sellers, as the case may be, shall allow the other party to take possession of such books and records.

  • Restriction on Activities Commencing as of the date first above written, and until the earlier of payment of the Note in full or full conversion of the Note, the Company shall not, directly or indirectly, without the Buyer’s prior written consent, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld: (a) change the nature of its business; or (b) sell, divest, acquire, change the structure of any material assets other than in the ordinary course of business.

  • Limitation on Liability The Company and the Underwriters agree that it would not be just and equitable if contribution pursuant to this Section 7 were determined by pro rata allocation (even if the Underwriters were treated as one entity for such purpose) or by any other method of allocation that does not take account of the equitable considerations referred to in paragraph (d) above. The amount paid or payable by an Indemnified Person as a result of the losses, claims, damages and liabilities referred to in paragraph (d) above shall be deemed to include, subject to the limitations set forth above, any legal or other expenses incurred by such Indemnified Person in connection with any such action or claim. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 7, in no event shall an Underwriter be required to contribute any amount in excess of the amount by which the total underwriting discounts and commissions received by such Underwriter with respect to the offering of the Securities exceeds the amount of any damages that such Underwriter has otherwise been required to pay by reason of such untrue or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission. No person guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation (within the meaning of Section 11(f) of the Securities Act) shall be entitled to contribution from any person who was not guilty of such fraudulent misrepresentation. The Underwriters’ obligations to contribute pursuant to this Section 7 are several in proportion to their respective purchase obligations hereunder and not joint.

  • Limitation on Out of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.