Approval of Wasteload Allocations Sample Clauses

Approval of Wasteload Allocations. The EPA is required by 303(d) of the Clean Water Act to review and approve/disapprove the allowable wasteloads established by the States within thirty days after submission. An additional thirty days is allowed to make necessary revisions to disapproved identifications and loads. All final approval of wasteload allocations are to be incorporated by the States into their water quality management plans through the Continuing Planning Process required under 303(e) of the Act. Although some wasteload allocations were submitted as part of the 303(e) basin plans and 208 Water Quality Management plans, these have not been formally approved by EPA. By linking the allocation approval/appeal process to the Water Quality Management Planning requirements, the wasteload allocation process has not been utilized effectively. On a case-by-case basis, EPA has been concurring with the States’ allocations for NPDES permits and 201 plans; however, no formal wasteload allocation approval process has been finalized to date. It is the intent of EPA to link the wasteload allocation review process to the NPDES permitting process where possible. Currently, all of the models discussed in Section III B have been used by Region IV states for both permits and funding purposes. Details on the development and use of models is generally contained in modeling or wasteload allocation methodology document developed by the States and submitted to EPA for approval. The States of Georgia and South Carolina have recently updated their methodology documents to include information developed in recent years. These updated documents have been reviewed and approved by EPA. Through this approval process, EPA can assure that comparable allocations are being developed for all States in the region. In addition, up-front agreement on modeling procedures helps to eliminate specific model application disagreements. Therefore, the States agree to update their modeling procedures (except for Georgia and South Carolina) during FY 83 for approval by EPA. EPA agrees to expeditiously review the procedures and exercise reasonable flexibility in that review. Approval of the methodology will then provide a basis for EPA approval of wasteload allocations developed in accordance with such methodology and will eliminate the necessity for an in- depth review of every allocation. Proposed wasteload allocations would be submitted to EPA for approval, along with the draft permits and would be specifically referenced as was...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Approval of Wasteload Allocations

  • Corrective Measures If the Participating Generator fails to meet or maintain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and/or the CAISO Tariff, the CAISO shall be permitted to take any of the measures, contained or referenced in the CAISO Tariff, which the CAISO deems to be necessary to correct the situation.

  • Reactive Power and Primary Frequency Response 9.6.1 Power Factor Design Criteria

  • Claims Allocation and Handling Agreement General Clauses 16 and 17 of the Claims Allocation and Handling Agreement provide that claims between parties to it are limited to specified amounts unless the parties expressly contract otherwise.

  • COSTS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH COUNTYWIDE COST ALLOCATIONS The indirect overhead and support service costs listed in the Summary Schedule (attached) are formally approved as actual costs for fiscal year 2020-21, and as estimated costs for fiscal year 2022-23 on a “fixed with carry-forward” basis. These costs may be included as part of the county departments’ costs indicated effective July 1, 2022, for further allocation to federal grants and contracts performed by the respective county departments.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Unbundled Subloop Distribution (USLD) 2.8.2.1 The USLD facility is a dedicated transmission facility that BellSouth provides from an End User’s point of demarcation to a BellSouth cross-connect device. The BellSouth cross-connect device may be located within a remote terminal (RT) or a stand-alone cross-box in the field or in the equipment room of a building. The USLD media is a copper twisted pair that can be provisioned as a 2-wire or 4-wire facility. BellSouth will make available the following subloop distribution offerings where facilities exist: USLD – Voice Grade (USLD-VG) Unbundled Copper Subloop (UCSL) USLD – Intrabuilding Network Cable (USLD-INC (aka riser cable))

  • CENTRALIZED CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS A. OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

  • CORRECTIVE MEASURE The contractor shall repair any deficiencies in excess of the performance guideline.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Modifications OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.