Amended Clause Samples

The "Amended" clause defines the process by which changes or modifications can be made to the terms of an agreement. Typically, this clause specifies that any amendments must be made in writing and agreed upon by all parties involved, ensuring that informal or unilateral changes are not valid. Its core practical function is to maintain clarity and mutual consent regarding any alterations to the contract, thereby preventing disputes over unauthorized or misunderstood modifications.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 14 times
Amended. Section 6.1 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
Amended. This Lease may be amended only by mutual written consent of the parties hereto.
Amended. Anything herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding, this Lease may be terminated, and the provisions of this Lease may be, in writing, amended by mutual consent of the parties hereto.
Amended. This Agreement shall be for a term of twenty-four (24) months commencing on and the day of December and continue from year either party gives notice in writing within ninety (90) days prior to the expiry date hereof of that party's intention to terminate this Agreement or to negotiate revisions thereto. During the term of this Collective Agreement, amendments, deletions or additions to any of the Articles herein, together with date of implementation, shall be made in writing and only by mutual consent of the parties.
Amended. This Agreement may be amended or supplemented at any time by the mutual written consent of the parties hereto.
Amended. It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ job to issue title insurance policies, and she issued one for this Property. (162a [13:5-19]). Allstates Title disbursed checks to the parties on the settlement sheet, including to itself, on the date of the closing, and issued a title commitment calling for a deed to the Plaintiff, despite the fact that no such deed was present at the settlement table. (165a [22:3-15]). Allstates Title sent the first deed, conveying the Property from ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ jointly to Seller alone, to Burlington to be recorded. (165a [23:19-20]). After that deed was recorded, Allstates Title then endeavored to obtain a second deed from Seller to Plaintiff by contacting the Seller as many as 20 times. (165a [23:20-24:7]). This was subsequent to the disbursements being made by Allstates Title at the purported closing. (165a [25:7-21]). Allstates Title claims the reason they waited to get the second deed signed on the instructions of Art Matuschat. (See 168a [40:12-15]; 170a [45:15-21]). This notwithstanding, Allstates Title concedes that it is very common to send two deeds to the County clerk with instructions to file one first, and then the other. (173a [54:16-22]). ▇▇▇▇▇▇ sent an email to Art Matuschat on May 15, 2019, over a month after the purported closing, telling ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇: “Attached per your request is a copy of the Title Commitment and the Affidavit of Title” but that “I don’t believe the second Deed was signed at Closing. The copy that I have in my file was not prepared correctly”]). (169a [38:1-23]; 327a). Allstates Title simply disbursed funds without having an executed deed to its client, the Plaintiff. (See 171a [47:12-22]). Upon being asked whether “[a]t the time that Allstates disbursed, did Allstates have an executed deed from the grantors to the grantee, plaintiff,” Allstates Title had to concede: “[y]ou’re asking if we had a deed that was granting the property from ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to (Plaintiff)...[w]e did not.” (171a [48:23-49:5]). Despite the fact that Plaintiff was Allstates Title’s customer and the agreement between Plaintiff and Defendants calling for insurance in an amount of $105,000, a policy was issued by Defendants to the Seller in an amount of $42,294. (See 175a-176a [65:24-66:7]). Allstates Title does not know why the amount changed from $105,000 to $42,294. (176a [67:11-13]). ▇▇▇▇▇▇ testified that Allstates Title decided to issue a policy to the Seller because the Seller was having trouble getting someone named ...
Amended. Section 4.6 of the Loan Agreement is hereby ------------------- amended by deleting the last sentence thereof in its entirety.
Amended. Section 8.4 (iii) of the Loan Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replace with the following:
Amended. Section 2.02 of the Mortgage is hereby amended by adding the following new paragraph to the Form of Note contained in such Section: "Anything in this Note, the Mortgage or elsewhere to the contrary notwithstanding, Seagull shall not be personally liable for the payment of the principal of, premium (if any) or interest on this Note, it being expressly understood and agreed that the sole recourse of the holder of this Note for the payment hereof shall be against the Mortgaged Property and that no recourse (whether under rule of law, statute or constitution or by the enforcement of any assessment or penalty or otherwise) shall be had against Seagull or any other Person for the payment of the principal of, premium (if any) or interest on this Note or for any claim based hereon or otherwise in respect hereof; provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall (i) affect the validity of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note or the rights of any holder of this Note to proceed against the Mortgaged Property in accordance with the Mortgage, (ii) constitute a waiver of any indebtedness or obligation evidenced by this Note (but the same shall continue until paid or discharged), (iii) limit or otherwise prejudice in any way the right of any holder of this Note to name Seagull or any owner, holder or transferee of any interest in the Mortgaged Property as a party defendant in any action or suit for judicial foreclosure of, or in the exercise of any other remedy available to such holder with respect to, the Mortgaged Property so long as no judgment in the nature of a deficiency or seeking personally liability shall be asked of or (if obtained) enforced against Seagull."
Amended. The final sentence of Section 2.1 is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: Confidential Information Biodesix-AVEO Pharmaceuticals (Amd to Co-Dev and Collaboration Agmt) (execution) ActiveUS 159415190v.1 “For avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding any language to the contrary herein and subject to the exception below, neither Party shall charge the other Party, whether through Ficlatuzumab Cost of Goods or otherwise, any FTE or overhead costs for such Party’s [**] designated representatives’ participation in the JSC or such [**] designated representatives’ activites performed hereunder, except that each Party may charge the other Party for FTE Costs incurred from and after August 1, 2016 for such Party’s designated representatives for any activities (excluding participation in the JSC) directly related to the management or performance of the NSCLC POC Trial.”