Issue 2. Compliance with Section VI of the Amended AD Agreement (Elimination of 85 Percent of Dumping) Petitioners’ Arguments Respondents calculated normal value with certain sales that cannot be used as a basis for normal value.36 34 See Antidumping Suspension Agreement on Sugar From Mexico: Rescission of 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 Administrative Reviews, 82 FR 26914 (June 12, 2017).
Issue 2. Should the Claimant’s Claim be struck out pursuant to Part 26.2(1)(c) of the CPR as it discloses no grounds for bringing the Claim? [52] Part 26.2(1)(c) of the CPR states as follows:
Issue 2. Natural Resource Protection as determined by consistency with and the implications of the Choctawhatchee Bay and River System and the Pensacola Bay System SWIM Plans and Closing the Gaps in Florida ‘S Wildlife Conservation System. (For the purposes of this report, the term “implications” will be limited to considerations involving land use, land development practices, and provision of infrastructure.)
Examples of Issue 2 in a sentence
According to ACB – OPMC 4 Issue 2 dated 04/09/2020, Stakeholder Consultation Requirements Section 6: Consultation during audit, §6.1: During the stage 2 and recertification audit of the management unit, the CB shall carry out stakeholder consultation to ensure continued compliance with the requirements of the certification standards.
Historical NotesDerived from Virginia Register Volume 13, Issue 2, eff.
November 21, 2012; amended and renumbered, Virginia Register Volume 30, Issue 2, eff.
Historical Notes Derived from Virginia Register Volume 35, Issue 2, eff.
No stakeholders’ consultation conducted in accordance to ACB – OPMC 4 Issue 2 dated 04/09/2020, Stakeholder Consultation Requirements Section 6: Consultation during audit, §6.1: During the stage 2 and recertification audit.
More Definitions of Issue 2
Issue 2. Is that matter the “subject” of the parties’ arbitration agreement?
Issue 2. Whether Bold is entitled to damages for breach of contract? [113] With respect to the issue of damages, Carib asserted that Bold could not maintain a claim for damages for breach of contract if that breach was Carib’s failure to pay a debt. In support of this submission, Carib relied on the learning of the authors of Chitty on Xxxxxxxxx xx xxxx 00-000 xxxxx xxxxxx as follows: “there is an important distinction between a claim for payment of a debt and a claim for damages for breach of contract. A debt is a definite sum of money fixed by the agreement of the parties as payable by one party or on the occurrence of some specified event or condition, whereas, damages may be claimed from a party who has broken his primary contractual obligation in some way other than by failure to pay such a debt.” [114] Carib submitted that Bold has not particularized as part of their claim any consequential losses arising from the alleged breach of contract. In addition, there is absolutely no evidence before this Honourable Court of any consequential losses suffered by Bold. Thus, Bold was not entitled in law to recover any damages for breach of contract. [115] It is notable that no submissions were made by Bold with respect to this issue notwithstanding its claim for this relief. [116] Given this Court’s conclusion that Carib did not breach their Agreement with Bold, I find that Bold is not entitled to any relief of damages for breach of contract. In any event, even if a breach was established, Bold failed to particularize any consequential losses suffered by the company as a result of the breach and also failed to advance convincing evidence to prove same.
Issue 2. Increases in Workload Due to Inclusion and Other Special Education Changes Since Fall 2008
Issue 2. Did the trial judge xxx in awarding Charter damages by assuming that the Government’s mandate caused UMFA to strike and to lose a four-year agreement that was similar to a proposal previously rejected?
Issue 2. Are the Defendants bound by the byelaws of the Declaration? [45] Learned Counsel for the Plaintiff, Xxx. Xxxxxx submitted that the Defendants are bound by the byelaws of the Declaration and more specifically, Clause 3 which provides as follows: “No trade manufacture business or commercial undertaking (other than long and short term rentals of condominium units) shall be permitted in any condominium unit and no condominium unit shall be used for any purpose other than residential purposes. Rental/leases for less than three (3) months are not permitted.” [Emphasis added]
Issue 2 whether the defendant breached the contract
Issue 2. For the off-stream watering with/without fencing BMP, the workgroup recommended that the efficiencies for the without-fencing category be reduced to increase the difference between this category and the with-fencing category. A higher efficiency is primarily proposed for this category because some states require at least a 35-foot setback for the fencing. o VA requires a 35-foot setback.