Validation results - developer Sample Clauses

Validation results - developer. Table 1 summaries the validation results per criteria defined in D7.1, run by a developer of the platform. In this way, we check if the platform is operational according to the first cycle requirements defined. Criteria (scenario) Fulfilled Not fulfilled Partially fulfilled Req-TEC-0001 – Registry activity ✓ Req-TEC-0101a – Components accessibility ✓ Req-TEC-0104 – Common Interface compliance ✓ Req-TEC-0105 – Metadata description ✓ Req-TEC-0106 – Format compliance ✓ Req-TEC-0108 – Error handling ✓ Req-TEC-0109 – Temporary data ✓ Req-TEC-0110 – Data transfer ✓ Req-TEC-0201 – Workflow design ✓ Req-TEC-0202 – Sharing designed workflows ✓ Req-TEC-0203 – Workflow execution ✓ Req-TEC-0301a – Interoperability among components ✓ Req-TEC-0303 – Common Interfaces availability ✓ Req-TEC-0304a – Common Interfaces design ✓ Req-TEC-1101 – Input/output proprietary data management ✓ Req-QUA-001 – PANACEA vs. non-PANACEA quality validation ✓ Req-QUA-002 – Quality validation over time ✓ Total (over17) 13 0 4 Table 1. Summary of the validation per criteria. As it can be seen almost all technical requirements specified for the first version of the platform are fulfilled (13 requirements over 17). Regarding the input/output proprietary data management requirement (Req-TEC-1101), PANACEA has not yet formally defined the related policy. However, a decision has been made to have a disclaimer on the web site to state that Service Providers will not keep copies of proprietary data uploaded to their servers for processing. Copies will only be maintained temporarily for ensuring the proper processing and delivery of the output data back to the user or to the following service and will be deleted after a certain amount of time. The partial fulfilment of the metadata description requirement (Req-TEC-0105) is due to the fact that the metadata and the closed vocabularies will evolve and may change at every platform release by extending the set of information available to the users for retrieving the web services supported by the platform. For this first integration cycle, however, basic metadata relevant for the services integrated were available. One of the most unsatisfactory points was related to Common Interface (Req-TEC-0104). There was no adequate Common Interface for monolingual and bilingual crawling separately, and some of the web services were not deployed using the Common Interface proposed. However, also in this case, we observed that, apart for bilingual crawling, Common Int...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Validation results - developer

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Test Results The employer, upon request from an employee or former employee, will provide the confidential written report issued pursuant to 4.9 of the Canadian Model in respect to that employee or former employee.

  • Mediation Results Any agreements resulting from mediation shall be memorialized in writing. The results of the mediation shall not be final or binding unless otherwise agreed to in writing by the parties. Mediators shall not be subject to any subpoena or liability, and their actions shall not be subject to discovery.

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • Feedback You have no obligation to provide us with ideas, suggestions, or proposals (“Feedback”). However, if you submit Feedback to us, then you grant us a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license that is sub-licensable and trans- ferable, to make, use, sell, have made, offer to sell, import, reproduce, publicly display, distribute, modify, or publicly perform the Feedback in any manner without any obligation, royalty, or restriction based on intellectual property rights or otherwise.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • Reverse Engineering The Customer must not reverse assemble or reverse compile or directly or indirectly allow or cause a third party to reverse assemble or reverse compile the whole or any part of the software or any products supplied as a part of the Licensed System.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.