TRANSITION OBJECTIVES Sample Clauses

TRANSITION OBJECTIVES. The principal transition objectives are:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
TRANSITION OBJECTIVES. The key objectives of Transition are:  To take over Services from the Incumbent Service Provider within six (6) months of the Effective Date and with minimal impact on the performance of the operations.  Ensure that the Service Provider steady state team has sufficient knowledge, documentation and resources to manage the operations at Commencement  Implement the Service Management tools and solutions to facilitate effective Service Management at Commencement The Service Provider will achieve these objectives by dividing the Transition into two phases (Phase I and Phase II). During Phase I, the Service Provider will focus its attention on activities that will enable the Service Provider to take over support of the environment at Commencement while ensuring no degradation of service to DIR and DIR Customers. Activities include acquiring sufficient knowledge and deploying the appropriate number of resources to ensure a seamless Transition of service from the Incumbent Service Provider to the Service Provider. Where possible, the Service Provider will improve operations documentations, including run books and Technical Recovery Guides (TRGs) and deploy its Service Management tools during Phase I to enable response to events before being alerted about the events by DIR or DIR Customers. These tools will be dormant until Commencement, unless approved by DIR. Section 4.0 of this document provides more detail about the activities the Service Provider plans to perform during this phase. During Phase II, the Service Provider will accomplish the activities that were not required in order to Transition services from the Incumbent Service Provider. In cases where the Service Provider was unable to install its Service Management tools during Phase I, the Service Provider will install them during Phase II. The Service Provider understands that some systems may not have the capacity to accept additional tools. In this case, the Service Provider will manage the systems as they are managed by the Incumbent Service Provider. Section 4.0 of this document provides more detail about the activities the Service Provider plans to perform during this phase. Major Transition activities include the following:  Staffing appropriately for Transition and Commencement support  Performing knowledge transfer from the Incumbent Service Provider  Performing knowledge transfer from DIR Customers for areas In-Scope for the Service Provider that the Incumbent Service Provider is not perfo...
Sample 1Sample 2
TRANSITION OBJECTIVES. The following are key Service Provider Transition objectives:  Complete Print-Mail hardware Refresh and described in Exhibit 19-A  Support MSI and SCP Transition activities as needed  Support MSI Asset Management Transition activities and specifically Print-Mail wall to wall inventory activities  Complete one time Critical Deliverables as defined in Exhibit 3  Support Cross Functional Transition with key areas being chargeback, and training on MSI tools and processes  Complete SMM to reflect changes to operating environment and Services  Establish roles and responsibilities in Governance as described in Exhibit 6  Update Disaster Recovery Plans and Technical Recovery Guides
Sample 1Sample 2
TRANSITION OBJECTIVES. Following are the objectives for the DIR DCS Multisourcing Service Integrator (MSI) Transition Project. For purposes of this document, references to the Transition Project or Transition Plan refer to the combined and integrated transition project plans of the MSI and SCPs to deliver the DCS Integrated Transition Project Plan.
Sample 1Sample 2
TRANSITION OBJECTIVES. (a) The objectives of this clause 14 are to:
Sample 1

Related to TRANSITION OBJECTIVES

  • Goals & Objectives 1. The goal of this Agreement is (INSERT GOAL(S) OF AGREEMENT).

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

  • Scope and Objectives 1. This Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) defines the rights and obligations of the Parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of their cooperation in the implementation of the Project.

  • Goals and Objectives The Parties acknowledge and agree that the specific goals and objectives of the Parties in entering into this Agreement are to:

  • Project Objectives The Program consists of the projects described in Annex I (each a “Project” and collectively, the “Projects”). The objective of each of the Projects (each a “Project Objective” and collectively, the “Project Objectives”) is to:

  • Agreement Objectives The parties agree that the objectives of the Agreement are to facilitate:

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • Targets and Milestones Comparing the relative performance of different groups to the over or under- representation within the institution and taking into account our current performance in our Access Agreement milestones, areas for particular focus include: Low Participating Neighbourhoods; Low income groups; Target groups to include gender, disability and care leavers; Black and minority ethnic (BME) group attainment; Completion rates. As a result of the analysis of our performances, our access, success and progression interventions will concentrate on the following: Continuation of involvement in collaborative outreach activity via the KMPF and the Kent and Medway Collaborative Network (KMCNet) as part of the National Network for Collaborative Outreach (NNCO); Recognition of the importance of carefully targeted activity; The use of serial rather than one-off interventions; The importance of long-term outreach to include the whole student lifecycle; The helpfulness of Higher Education Access Tracker (HEAT) for evaluating the impact of interventions; The importance of a whole institution approach; The importance of student attendance monitoring; Ease of access to information and student welfare support; An increasing emphasis on evaluation of activities across the student lifecycle; Accessibility of employability advice and support. Given our relatively strong record to date for widening access and student success, most of the targets seek to maintain, and where possible improve, this performance within a more challenging financial environment. Such targets may be especially challenging and stretching in relation to the access of those from Low Participating Neighbourhoods (LPNs), given the demographic decline in the number of young people (aged 18-21) in the population and the University’s already high recruitment levels from these groups. We have removed the University’s NS-SEC target in response to the UK Performance Indicator Steering Group announcement that HESA will no longer be publishing the NS-SEC indicator after 2016. As we already have LPN and Household Income targets in place we shall not be replacing this target with an alternative. We have reviewed our success targets and added new progression targets for 2017. There was a concern in the institution that our internal reporting did not allow for national and regionally adjusted benchmark comparison. We have therefore made the following adjustments to our success targets: Non-continuation two years following year of entry: part-time first degree entrants – all entrants: Replacing the OFFA agreement target with the similar data from HESA allows for national benchmarking to be undertaken in order to ensure that the University is maintaining its commitment to these students. We aim to keep our non-continuation rate in this area below our HESA benchmark rate. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – mature entrants: Changing the target to clearly focus on mature full-time first degree students (to match the national HESA data) ensures that we focus our efforts on this section of the student population and for the outcomes to be compared with HESA benchmarks rather than internally produced data. We aim to ensure that this student population’s non-continuation rate is at or below the HESA benchmark rate by 2020/21. Non-continuation following year of entry: UK domiciled full-time first degree entrants – all entrants: In order to ensure that young students are not disadvantaged by the focus on mature entrants, the University will also commit to maintaining the overall non-continuation rate for all students at or below the HESA benchmark. BME: the University will replace the current phrasing of the target around BME success with a more explicit aim of reducing the success gap experienced by BME students. Progression: the University has added a progression target that aims to keep us around or above the sector benchmark for the Employment Indicator from the DLHE survey. Combined targets from the collaborative KMPF project (agreed by all partners) are to raise applications and subsequent conversions to higher education from within the target schools and colleges in LPNs. These targets will need to be reviewed in the coming years to reflect changes to GCSE grading in schools. Our institutional and collaborative targets are included in tables 7a and 7b respectively.

  • Aims and Objectives 1.9.1 The aims and objectives of this Agreement are to:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.