SITLA’s Review of Reclamation Plan Sample Clauses

SITLA’s Review of Reclamation Plan. SITLA shall review the Reclamation Plan and approve or request reasonable modifications within 30 days of receipt. If Lessee disagrees with the requested modifications, the parties shall attempt to resolve the dispute in good faith for 30 days. If the parties cannot resolve the dispute within 30 days, SITLA may hire an independent third party to conduct a study and prepare a Reclamation Plan for the Project. Lessee shall pay the costs of any such study and Reclamation Plan.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SITLA’s Review of Reclamation Plan. If the parties cannot agree on a modified Reclamation Plan, SITLA may hire an independent third party to conduct a study and prepare a Reclamation Plan for the Project. Lessee shall pay the costs of any such study and Reclamation Plan. Lessee may not modify the Reclamation Plan without SITLA’s consent, which consent SITLA may not unreasonably withhold. Lessee may update the Reclamation Plan at any time in addition to the times required by this Section.

Related to SITLA’s Review of Reclamation Plan

  • Remediation Plan If deficiencies or weaknesses are cited on the evaluation form, the evaluator, working with the evaluatee, shall develop a written remediation plan for the purpose of assisting the evaluatee to improve. The remedial action plan shall be attached to the evaluation document and shall contain:

  • Project Management Plan 1 3.4.1 Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control 2 activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work.

  • Staffing Plan 8.l The Board and the Association agree that optimum class size is an important aspect of the effective educational program. The Polk County School Staffing Plan shall be constructed each year according to the procedures set forth in Board Policy and, upon adoption, shall become Board Policy.

  • Peer Assistance and Review Program 1. MCEA and MCPS agree to jointly operate a Peer Assistance and Review (PAR) Program. The PAR Program is a mechanism for maintaining systemwide quality control and ensuring that all MCPS teachers responsible for teaching students are functioning at or above the high MCPS standards of performance. It provides intensive assistance for any teacher who has not yet achieved that standard or who falls below acceptable standards. Assistance and review are provided to both experienced MCPS teachers in need of significant improvement and teachers in their first year of teaching.

  • Quality Assurance Plan The contractor shall develop and submit to NMFS a contractor Quality Assurance Plan, as referenced in Section F.5.3, which details how the contractor will ensure effectiveness and efficiency of collection efforts as well as the quality of data collected by its At-Sea Monitors. The contractor shall further establish, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance Management program to ensure consistent quality of all work products and services performed under this contract.

  • Monitoring Plan keep up with the objectives from the cadetship practice booklet; taking daily notes as well as learning new information every day; currently reporting to the supervisor. Evaluation plan: the final result should be in accordance with the traineeship’s aims and objectives, achieving an improvement of specialty knowledge and language skills. The level of language competence9 in English that the trainee already has or agrees to acquire by the start of the mobility period is: A1 ☐ A2 ☐ B1 ☐ B2 ☒ C1 ☐ C2 ☐ Native speaker ☐ Table B - Sending Institution Please use only one of the following three boxes: 10 The traineeship is embedded in the curriculum and upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to:Award ……...…ECTS credits (or equivalent)11 Give a grade based on: Traineeship certificate ☒ Final report ☒ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records and Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☒ No ☐ The traineeship is voluntary and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Give a grade: Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate if this will be based on: Traineeship certificate ☐ Final report ☐ Interview ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Transcript of Records: Yes ☐ No ☐ Record the traineeship in the trainee's Diploma Supplement (or equivalent). Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document: Yes ☐ No ☐ The traineeship is carried out by a recent graduate and, upon satisfactory completion of the traineeship, the institution undertakes to: Award ECTS credits (or equivalent): Yes ☐ No ☐ If yes, please indicate the number of credits: …. Record the traineeship in the trainee's Europass Mobility Document (highly recommended): Yes ☐ No ☐ Accident insurance for the trainee The Sending Institution will provide an accident insurance to the trainee (if not provided by the Receiving Organisation/Enterprise): Yes ☐ No ☒ The accident insurance covers: - accidents during travels made for work purposes: Yes ☐ No ☒ - accidents on the way to work and back from work: Yes ☐ No ☒

  • Management Plan The Management Plan is the description and definition of the phasing, sequencing and timing of the major Individual Project activities for design, construction procurement, construction and occupancy as described in the IPPA.

  • Training Plan Within 90 days after the Effective Date, Good Shepherd shall develop a written plan (Training Plan) that outlines the steps Good Shepherd will take to ensure that: (a) all Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding Good Shepherd’s CIA requirements and Compliance Program, including the Code of Conduct and (b) all Relevant Covered Persons receive adequate training regarding: (i) the Federal health care program requirements regarding eligibility for hospice services upon initial admission, recertification for continued stay, and for Continuous Care, Respite Care, and General Inpatient Care; (ii) the role of physicians in making eligibility determinations; (iii) the accurate coding and submission of claims; (iv) policies, procedures, and other requirements applicable to the documentation of medical records; (v) the personal obligation of each individual involved in the claims submission process to ensure that such claims are accurate; (vi) applicable reimbursement statutes, regulations, and program requirements and directives; (vii) the legal sanctions for violations of the Federal health care program requirements; and (viii) examples of proper and improper eligibility determinations, documentation, and claims submission practices. The Training Plan shall include information regarding the training topics, the categories of Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons required to attend each training session, the length of the training, the schedule for training, and the format of the training. Within 30 days of the OIG’s receipt of Good Shepherd’s Training Plan, OIG will notify Good Shepherd of any comments or objections to the Training Plan. Absent notification by the OIG that the Training Plan is unacceptable, Good Shepherd may implement its Training Plan. Good Shepherd shall furnish training to its Covered Persons and Relevant Covered Persons pursuant to the Training Plan during each Reporting Period.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Ongoing Review and Revisions As set forth in Section 35.7, the Parties have agreed to the coordination and exchange of data and information under this Agreement to enhance system reliability and efficient market operations as systems exist and are contemplated as of the Effective Date. The Parties expect that these systems and the technology applicable to these systems and to the collection and exchange of data will change from time to time throughout the term of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the objectives of this Agreement can be fulfilled efficiently and economically only if the Parties, from time to time, review and, as appropriate, revise the requirements stated herein in response to such changes, including deleting, adding, or revising requirements and protocols. Each Party will negotiate in good faith in response to such revisions the other Party may propose from time to time. Nothing in this Agreement, however, shall require any Party to reach agreement with respect to any such changes, or to purchase, install, or otherwise implement new equipment, software, or devices, or functions, except as required to perform this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.