Seven Performance Categories Sample Clauses

Seven Performance Categories. Assessment of Data Sufficiency, Progress and Good Faith Efforts In this section of the commentary, the Co-Neutrals review the seven performance categories under the CSA, commenting on: the sufficiency of data presented to the Co-Neutrals and DHS’ efforts to achieve substantial and sustained progress toward targeted outcomes. From the beginning of DHS’ reform efforts, the Co-Neutrals have encouraged DHS to sequence its implementation of the Pinnacle Plan with an initial, intense focus on three areas – reducing caseloads so that staff have the time and capacity to care for children; increasing the supply of xxxxxx homes so that children who have been separated from their families have safe and appropriate places to live; and reducing the use of shelter care, especially for young children and infants. To achieve substantial and sustained progress toward targeted outcomes in all performance categories, it is essential that DHS first achieve substantial and sustained progress in reducing caseloads and increasing its pool of safe, diverse and stable xxxxxx homes. All child welfare systems must have a solid foundation of manageable caseloads and a sufficient number of xxxxxx homes to meet the diverse needs of children and to promote their safety, permanency and well-being. To fully assess DHS’ reform progress, it is necessary to understand and consider the interconnected impact of each of the seven performance categories on one another and not review progress of any one area in a vacuum. As such, the Co-Neutrals again want to reiterate that the cross-metric impact of having a robust pool of xxxxxx homes and manageable caseloads cannot be underestimated. These areas in particular represent the two foundational pillars for reform, upon which all other areas of the CSA performance categories, as well as reforms identified in the Pinnacle Plan, will rest. DHS has encountered a number of formidable challenges in implementing this reform effort. As has been widely reported, DHS has experienced a surge in the number of children placed in DHS’ custody, a trend underway and noticeable at the time the Pinnacle Plan was submitted by DHS and approved.1 The Co-Neutrals highlighted in the October 2013 report that DHS placed a great deal of its resources reorganizing the reporting structure of its child welfare system, which has been a wide-scale undertaking. In fact, the system and personnel changes were so significant that some of the instability in the system now is a result...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Seven Performance Categories

  • KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 10.1 The Supplier shall at all times during the Framework Period comply with the Key Performance Indicators and achieve the KPI Targets set out in Part B of Framework Schedule 2 (Goods and/or Services and Key Performance Indicators).

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Annual Performance Bonus In each calendar year of the Term of Employment, Executive shall be eligible to receive an annual incentive bonus (the “Annual Bonus”) payable in cash, pursuant to the performance criteria and targets established and administered by the Board (or a committee of directors to whom such responsibility has been delegated by the Board), with a target Annual Bonus of at least 100% of his Base Salary. The Annual Bonus payable to Executive each year shall be determined and payable as soon as practicable after year-end for such year (but no later than March 15th). The Executive’s cash bonus for the stub period of 2017 will be determined in the reasonable business judgment of the Board or another committee of directors to whom such responsibility has been delegated by the Board. To be entitled to receive any Annual Bonus, except as otherwise provided in Sections 5(c) and 5(d), Executive must remain employed through the last day of the calendar year to which the Annual Bonus relates.

  • Performance Measure The specific representation of a process or outcome that is relevant to the assessment of performance; it is quantifiable and can be documented

  • Performance Schedule The Parties will perform their respective responsibilities in accordance with the Performance Schedule. By executing this Agreement, Customer authorizes Motorola to proceed with contract performance.

  • Performance Indicators The HSP’s delivery of the Services will be measured by the following Indicators, Targets and where applicable Performance Standards. In the following table: n/a meanç ‘not-appIicabIe’, that there iç no defined Performance Standard for the indicator for the applicable year. tbd means a Target, and a Performance Standard, if applicable, will be determined during the applicable year. INDICATOR CATEGORY INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD Organizational Health and Financial Indicators Debt Service Coverage Ratio (P) 1 c1 Total Margin (P) 0 cO Coordination and Access Indicators Percent Resident Days – Long Stay (E) n/a n/a Wait Time from LHIN Determination of Eligibility to LTC Home Response (M) n/a n/a Long-Term Care Home Refusal Rate (E) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2/3 INDICATOR CATEGORY Quality and Resident Safety Indicators INDICATOR P = Performance Indicator E = Explanatory Indicator M = Monitoring Indicator Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 days (M) 2019/20 PERFORMANCE TARGET STANDARD n/a n/a Percentage of Residents Whose Pressure Ulcer Worsened (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents on Antipsychotics Without a Diagnosis of Psychosis (M) n/a n/a Percentage of Residents in Daily Physical Restraints (M) n/a n/a SCHEDULE D — PERFORMANCE 2.0 LHIN-Specific Performance Obligations 3/3

  • PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS Upon a particular Commission’s issuance of an Order pertaining to Performance Measurements in a proceeding expressly applicable to all CLECs generally, BellSouth shall implement in that state such Performance Measurements as of the date specified by the Commission. Performance Measurements that have been Ordered in a particular state can currently be accessed via the internet at xxxx://xxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx. The following Service Quality Measurements (SQM) plan as it presently exists and as it may be modified in the future, is being included as the performance measurements currently in place for the state of Tennessee. At such time that the TRA issues a subsequent Order pertaining to Performance Measurements, such Performance Measurements shall supersede the SQM contained in the Agreement. BellSouth Service Quality Measurement Plan‌ (SQM) Tennessee Performance Metrics Measurement Descriptions Version 2.00 Issue Date: July 1, 2003 Introduction

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Employee Performance Review When a formal review of an employee’s performance is made, the employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to discuss, sign and make written comments on the review form in question and the employee is to receive a signed copy to indicate that its contents have been read. An employee shall be entitled to a minimum of two (2) work days to review the performance review prior to providing any response to the Employer, verbally or in writing, with respect to the evaluation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.