Selection of assessment approach Sample Clauses

Selection of assessment approach. In determining, for the purposes of clause 8(2) of the Environmental Assessment Administrative Procedures (NT), whether the proponent must prepare a public environmental report or an environmental impact statement for an action, the NT EPA must have Information that it considers to be sufficient to make the determination. In determining, for the purpose of section 10 of the Environmental Assessment Act (NT), whether an inquiry under the Inquiries Act (NT) is required, the Minister or the NT EPA must have Information that it considers to be sufficient to make the determination. In addition to Items 3.2(a) and 3.2(b), in selecting the assessment approach, the Minister or NT EPA, whoever makes the determination, must also consider criteria equivalent to the criteria set out in the guidelines (if any) issued under section 87(6) of the EPBC Act to the extent relevant to the determination. Guidelines, directions and matters to be addressed The matters to be addressed in clause 8(3) of the Environmental Assessment Administrative Procedures (NT) and any terms of reference issued to proponents of controlled actions will require material prepared by the proponent as part of the assessment to: contain an assessment of all impacts that the action has, will have or is likely to have on each matter protected by a provision of Part 3 of the EPBC Act; contain enough Information about the controlled action and its relevant impacts to allow the Commonwealth Minister to make an informed decision whether or not to approve the controlled action under the EPBC Act; and address the matters outlined in Schedule 4 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Cth). If appropriate, public comment will be sought, having regard to any comments from the Commonwealth Minister and the objects of the EPBC Act, on terms of reference before they are made. lf public comments are sought, the publication requirements described in ltems 3.4(b) and 3.4(c) must be complied with.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Selection of assessment approach. Where the SA Minister makes a determination under section 75(4)(a) of the Development Xxx 0000 (SA), the decision maker must: have Information that it considers to be sufficient to make the determination; and consider criteria equivalent to the criteria that are mentioned in any guidelines published under subsection 87(6) of the EPBC Act, to the extent relevant to the determination. Assessment approach must assess relevant impacts The assessment approach must include an assessment of the relevant impacts of the action as defined in section 82 of the EPBC Act. Public comment For the class of actions described in Item 2.1(d)(iv) of this Schedule 1: draft assessment documentation about each assessment must have been made available to the public and released for public comment; and the public must have been given at least 14 days to provide comments to the consent authority. For each prescribed class of action, when the public is invited to comment, the invitation must: be published in accordance with the requirements of either Items 7.02 or 7.03 of Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Cth); and include the matters specified in Item 7.04 of Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Cth). For each prescribed class of action, the proponent must have: been provided with submissions made by the public during the period that the assessment is released for public comments; and prepared a written response for inclusion in the assessment documentation, which summarises or takes into account the issues raised by the public in those submissions. Assessment Report An assessment report must be prepared by the SA Minister for each action that is assessed which takes into account: the Information in the assessment documentation; and any other relevant Information available to the SA Minister or inquiry. Execution page EXECUTED as an agreement SIGNED for and on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia by: The Hon Xxxx Xxxx MP Minister for the Environment 8.9.2014 Date SIGNED for and on behalf of the State of South Australia by: The Hon Xxxx Xxx MP LLB Minister for Planning 24.9.2014 Date The Xxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx MP Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy 23.9.2014 Date The Hon Xxxxx Close MP Acting Minister for Sustainability, Environment and Conservation 25.9.2014
Sample 1

Related to Selection of assessment approach

  • Sole Source as Grounds for Rejection of a Change Order If a Change Order is submitted to Contractor for the purposes of adding a Bulletin to this Contract and said Bulletin designates a Sole Source from which Contractor is required to procure goods or services necessary to perform the Work, which Sole Source has not been designated previously, Contractor shall be entitled to reject the proposed Change Order if the designated Sole Source refuses to provide to Contractor the warranties, bonds, terms or schedule required under the Contract Documents, including any warranty or terms or schedule required by Bulletins referenced in the proposed Change Order. In such event, Contractor shall give written notice to the Owner rejecting the proposed Change Order and, if possible, shall accompany said written notice with a proposal from Contractor for changes or modifications to the Bulletin so as to eliminate the Sole Source designation but to achieve goods or services equal in quality or function. The Owner may then require the Design Professional to revise the subject Bulletin so as to eliminate the designation of the Sole Source by incorporation of Contractor's proposal or otherwise. Upon revision of the Bulletin by the Design Professional and approval thereof by the Owner, the Owner shall again submit to the Contractor a proposed Change Order for the purpose of adding the revised Bulletin to this Contract. If the Owner decides to retain the Sole Source in the Change Order and Contractor cannot acquire the full contractually required warranties from the Sole Source, Contractor shall be held only to the warranty terms and schedule obtainable from the Sole Source.

  • SUBMISSION OF THE MONTHLY MI REPORT 4.1 The completed MI Report shall be completed electronically and returned to the Authority by uploading the electronic MI Report computer file to MISO in accordance with the instructions provided in MISO.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • A3 Contractor’s Status At all times during the Contract Period the Contractor shall be an independent contractor and nothing in the Contract shall create a contract of employment, a relationship of agency or partnership or a joint venture between the Parties and accordingly neither Party shall be authorised to act in the name of, or on behalf of, or otherwise bind the other Party save as expressly permitted by the Terms of the Contract.

  • Qualified Service Contracts - Rev Proc. 97-13. A Service Contract is considered to contain termination penalties if the termination limits the Recipient’s right to compete with the Service Provider, requires the Recipient to purchase equipment, goods or services from the Service Provider, or requires the Recipient to pay liquidated damages for cancellation of the Service Contract. Another contract between the Service Provider and the Recipient (for example, a loan or guarantee by the Service Provider) is considered to create a contract termination penalty if that contract contains terms that are not customary or arm’s length that could operate to prevent the Recipient from terminating the Service Contract. A requirement that the Recipient reimburses the Service Provider for ordinary and necessary expenses, or restrictions on the hiring by the Recipient of key personnel of the Service Provider are not treated as contract termination penalties. If the Recipient chooses to apply the following safe harbors, a Service Contract is a Qualified Service Contract if entered into before (and not materially modified after) August 18, 2017 and all of the following conditions are satisfied:

  • CERTIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT PRICE DETERMINATION By submission of this bid, the Bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, that in connection with this procurement:

  • Doctor's Certificate of Inability to Work The Employer may require an employee who is unable to work because of illness or injury to provide a statement from:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.