Safety Concept Clause Samples
Safety Concept. 6.1. Safe Operation ±Vehicle Manufacturer Statement.......................................................
Safety Concept. To be a safe device, the lawn-mower must ensure that (1) the user cannot touch the cutting tool while it is running, (2) the robot does not drive into unsafe areas, such as public roads or ponds, and (3) the battery does not explode due to improper charging. The robot has been designed such that (under normal circumstances) the blades can only be touched by lifting the robot. Furthermore, it is assumed that user installs the boundary wire in such a way that it does not comprise any regions that must not be mowed (holes, ponds, beds, etc.).
Safety Concept. Due the nature of the initial prototype, some of the safety concepts that have been proposed in D5.1 need to be adapted in accordance with the layout provided by LMS. The objective of this adaptation is to allow a detailed understanding of the proposed safety solutions for the small-scale pilot that will be tested in LMS premises. These solutions are presented to ensure the machine complies with the mechanical, electrical, pneumatic and control requirements in this first phase of the project. A small description of the changes is provided bellow (for more information on the requirements for each function check the section 6.2 - Safety Concepts of the D5.1), together with a checklist for the different requirements.
23.1. Collaborative approach – front area (6.
2.1) This concept involves safely dividing the robot's working space into two distinct areas: the frontal area and the back area. This allows the robot to work continuously in method 4 in a fenceless environment, using internal safety functions such as Safety Planes or Joint Position Limit will be employed for this purpose. All the other associated functions remain the same.
Safety Concept. A core issue of actively redundant fault tolerant systems is the ability to test vital parts of the HW online during operation to avoid the accumulation of faults among replicated hardware. Such accumulation could impede majority voting and thus lead to positive vote on incorrect messages provided by replicas affected by accumulated faults. The concepts for self-testing hardware in single core architectures are well established. However the introduction of multiple cores mandates enhanced algorithms, especially for testing system memory and caches. Care has to be taken to minimize the impact of memory testing in multi-core architectures on system reactivity. The demonstrator will analyze the impact of various algorithms and concepts of online hardware testing.
Safety Concept. Due the nature of the initial prototype, some of the safety concepts that have been proposed in D5.1 need to be adapted in accordance with the layout provided by LMS. The objective of this adaptation is to allow a detailed understanding of the proposed safety solutions for the small-scale pilot that will be tested in LMS premises. These solutions are presented to ensure the machine complies with the mechanical, electrical, pneumatic and control requirements in this first phase of the project. A small description of the changes is provided bellow (for more information on the requirements for each function check the section 4.2 - Safety Concepts of the D5.1), together with a checklist for the different requirements.
Safety Concept. In terms of market making, JAP's AMM model is an automatic market maker algorithm to reduce the risk of abnormal loss; in asset hosting, because JAP does not control the wallet to control the private key, funds is safe in real time.
