Project Eligibility Determination Sample Clauses

Project Eligibility Determination. It has been determined that the use of Xxxxx Xxxxxx/Bethlehem Bond Financing funds by “VIP” will be in compliance with legislation supporting community development in Xxxxx Xxxxxx/Bethlehem as authorized under the Urban Redevelopment Authority which acts in behalf of the Augusta Commission to provide oversight of the operation of the Xxxxx Xxxxxx/Bethlehem Redevelopment Project. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, “VIP” shall provide activities and services as described in the description of the project, including use of funds, its goals and objectives, tasks to be performed and a detailed schedule for completing the tasks for this project as provided in Exhibit A of this contract.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Project Eligibility Determination. It has been determined that the use of HOME Program funds by Xxxxx Xxxxxx Development Corporation will be in compliance with 24 CFR Part 92. The project has been underwritten and reviewed in accordance with underwriting standards and criteria of Augusta and the amount of subsidy provided is appropriate. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, Xxxxx Xxxxxx Development Corporation shall provide activities and services as described in the description of the project, including use of funds, its goals and objectives, tasks to be performed and a detailed schedule for completing the tasks for this project as provided in Exhibit A of this contract.
Sample 1
Project Eligibility Determination. It has been determined that the use of HOME Program funds by Antioch Ministries, Inc., Inc. will be in compliance with 24 CFR Part 92. The project has been underwritten and reviewed in accordance with underwriting standards and criteria of Augusta and the amount of subsidy provided is appropriate. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, Antioch Ministries, Inc., Inc. shall provide activities and services as described in the description of the project, including use of funds, its goals and objectives, tasks to be performed and a detailed schedule for completing the tasks for this project as provided in Exhibit A of this contract. AMI will comply with § 92.300(a)(1) & §92.300(a)(2)
Sample 1
Project Eligibility Determination. It has been determined that the use of HOME Program funds by XxXxx Xxxxx will be in compliance with 24 CFR Part 92. The project has been underwritten and reviewed in accordance with underwriting standards and criteria of Augusta and the amount of subsidy provided is appropriate. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, XxXxx Xxxxx shall provide activities and services as described in the description of the project, including use of funds, its goals and objectives, tasks to be performed and a detailed schedule for completing the tasks for this project as provided in Exhibit A of this contract. XXXXX XXXXX will comply with § 92.300(a)(1) & §92.300(a)(2)
Sample 1
Project Eligibility Determination. It has been determined that the use of HOME Program funds by Sand Hills Urban Development, Inc. will be in compliance with 24 CFR Part 92. The project has been underwritten and reviewed in accordance with underwriting standards and criteria of Augusta and the amount of subsidy provided is appropriate. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this contract, Sand Hills Urban Development, Inc. shall provide activities and services as described in the description of the project, including use of funds, its goals and objectives, tasks to be performed and a detailed schedule for completing the tasks for this project as provided in Exhibit A of this contract. SHUD will comply with § 92.300(a)(1) & §92.300(a)(2)
Sample 1

Related to Project Eligibility Determination

  • Eligibility Determination The State or its designee will make eligibility determinations for each of the HHSC HMO Programs.

  • Penalty Determination H&SC section 39619.7 requires CARB to provide information on the basis for the penalties it seeks. This Agreement includes this information, which is also summarized here. The provision of law the penalty is being assessed under and why that provision is most appropriate for that violation. The penalty provision being applied in this case is H&SC section 42402 et seq. because Family Dollar sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured for sale consumer products for commerce in California in violation of the Consumer Products Regulations (17 CCR section 94507 et seq.). The penalty provisions of H&SC section 42402 et seq. apply to violations of the Consumer Products Regulations because the regulations were adopted under authority of H&SC section 41712, which is in Part 4 of Division 26. The manner in which the penalty amount was determined, including aggravating and mitigating factors and per unit or per vehicle basis for the penalty. H&SC section 42402 et seq. provides strict liability penalties of up to $10,000 per day for violations of the Consumer Product Regulations with each day being a separate violation. In cases like this, involving unintentional violations of the Consumer Products Regulations where the violator cooperates with the investigation, CARB has obtained penalties based on the excess emissions of VOCs. Administrative penalties are also obtained in some cases. In this case, the total penalty is $4000 for emission violations. The per-unit penalty was based on 0.23 tons of excess VOC emissions. The penalty in this case was reduced because this was a strict liability first-time violation and Family Dollar made diligent efforts to cooperate with the investigation. Additionally, Family Dollar is no longer selling Modesa Extra Firm Holding Hairspray and Family Dollar Extra Firm Hold Hairspray. Final penalties were determined based on the unique circumstances of this matter, considered together with the need to remove any economic benefit from noncompliance, the goal of deterring future violations and obtaining swift compliance, the consideration of past penalties in similar negotiated cases, and the potential cost and risk associated with litigating these particular violations. The penalty reflects violations extending over a number of days resulting in quantifiable harm to the environment considered together with the complete circumstances of this case. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger on a per ton basis. The final penalty in this case was based in part on confidential financial information or confidential business information provided by Family Dollar that is not retained by CARB in the ordinary course of business. The penalty in this case was also based on confidential settlement communications between CARB and Family Dollar that CARB does not retain in the ordinary course of business. The penalty also reflects CARB’s assessment of the relative strength of its case against Family Dollar, the desire to avoid the uncertainty, burden and expense of litigation, obtain swift compliance with the law and remove any unfair advantage that Family Dollar may have secured from its actions. Is the penalty being assessed under a provision of law that prohibits the emission of pollution at a specified level, and, if so a quantification of excess emissions, if it is practicable to do so. The Consumer Product Regulations do not prohibit emissions above a specified level, but they do limit the concentration of VOCs in regulated products. In this case, a quantification of the excess emissions attributable to the violations was practicable because Family Dollar gave sales data necessary to make this quantification. Based upon this information (which Family Dollar has designated as confidential), the violations were calculated to have 0.23 tons of excess VOC emissions emitted in California.

  • Benefit Eligibility For purposes of the Benefit Plan entitlement, common-law and same sex relationships will apply as defined.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.