On-Time Performance CRITERIA Sample Clauses

On-Time Performance CRITERIA. The On Time Performance Criteria will track bus companies’ on-time performance. A late bus is defined as follows: AM: A route arriving 10 minutes before the scheduled arrival time or after the official bell time. PM: A route arriving after the official bell time for the first tier or arriving 10 minutes after the scheduled dismissal time for the second tier. On-time performance will not be measured for routes that are part of “bad” pairings, on inclement weather days, or during the first 15 working days of school. Delays due to known school activities or known traffic problems will not be counted. An On-Time Performance Score will be calculated each day via the Trapeze AVL/GPS system. It is incumbent on the Contractor to insure that the bus and the AVL/GPS numbers are aligned. Buses that are not aligned will be counted as late for that time period. Contractors will be provided two business days to respond to MPS reports of late buses in order to provide necessary adjustments where buses are not communicating properly due to a failure of the GPS/AVL. A period from September 21, 2015 through November 13, 2015 will be used to test the GPS/AVL and determine that it is operationally satisfactory for MPS and the bus contractors. Bus Contractors and MPS will review the on-time performance data and determine if the scoring needs revision. The scoring indicated below will take into account variations due to breakdowns and replacement issues. Beginning September 21, 2015, MPS will provide each Contractor with a daily assessment of their on-time performance. A total of 20 points is available to be added to a contractors score for On-Time Performance. The scoring is detailed below.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to On-Time Performance CRITERIA

  • Performance Criteria The Performance Criteria are set forth in Exhibit A to this Agreement.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out-

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Metrics In the event Grantee fails to timely achieve the following performance metrics (the “Performance Metrics”), then in accordance with Section 8.4 below Grantee shall upon written demand by Triumph repay to Triumph all portions of Grant theretofore funded to and received by Grantee:

  • Performance Measures and Metrics This section outlines the performance measures and metrics upon which service under this SLA will be assessed. Shared Service Centers and Customers will negotiate the performance metric, frequency, customer and provider service responsibilities associated with each performance measure. Measurements of the Port of Seattle activities are critical to improving services and are the basis for cost recovery for services provided. The Port of Seattle and The Northwest Seaport Alliance have identified activities critical to meeting The NWSA’s business requirements and have agreed upon how these activities will be assessed.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.