Impact of Sharding Sample Clauses

Impact of Sharding. ‌ Finally, the seventh experiment intends to demonstrate XxxXxxxx’s ability of handling transactions with different ’weights’, that is, with different numbers of iterations. We, therefore, consider two types of transactions: light and heavy ones, which have 100 and 50, 000 iterations per smart contract, respectively. To test how this affects the system, we split the client pool into heavy and light clients – each client only sends one type of transaction. We, again, test two different system configurations – 9 and 35 clusters, each with 3 nodes – and, additionally, we test the differences of the system sharding its clusters or not. If the system is not sharded, then different types of clients can share clusters; if the system is sharded, then each cluster can only take one type of request. Since there are two types of clients, we must also settle on how many clients of each type there are. To this end, we decided on the following percentages of heavy clients: 0, 1, 10, 25, 50, 75 and 100. Note that in the case of sharding, these percentages also correspond to the percentages of heavy clusters available. Conversely, when testing with these data points, we noticed that another parameter was also relevant: the percentage of heavy requests. Therefore the data points presented in the following graphs have the latter percentages as the x-axis, but still maintaining the same initial percentage of clients and clusters. For instance, the third data point in SepChain with 9 clusters has the x-axis value of 6.42. This means that even though there are 25% of heavy clients, only 6.42% of the total number of requests are in fact heavy. The percentages of heavy requests were chosen in order to reduce the tail effect of heavy clients – if, for example, there were constantly 50% of heavy requests, these would finish slower than the total number of light requests. For this reason, more light requests are added to ensure that all the Impact of added security - 100 iterations (log y) 100 8 10 12 14 16
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Impact of Sharding

  • Pain Management Inpatient rehabilitation for Pain Management is excluded.

  • Traffic Management The Customer will not utilize the Services in a manner which, in the view of the Centre Operator, significantly distorts traffic balance on the Centre Operator’s circuits which are shared with other users. If, in the reasonable view of the Centre Operator, the Customer’s traffic patterns cause or may cause such distortion, the Customer should have a dedicated circuit capability. If the Customer declines to do so then the Centre Operator may suspend the Services while the matter is being resolved. If there is no resolution within 5 business days then either party may terminate the Agreement.

  • Crisis Management 1. The Parties reaffirm their commitment to cooperating in promoting international peace and stability.

  • Structural Adjustment 1. Exceptional measures of limited duration which derogate from the provisions of Article 4 may be taken by the Parties in the form of increased customs duties.

  • Vulnerability Management BNY Mellon will maintain a documented process to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities affecting its systems used to provide the services. BNY Mellon will classify security vulnerabilities using industry recognized standards and conduct continuous monitoring and testing of its networks, hardware and software including regular penetration testing and ethical hack assessments. BNY Mellon will remediate identified security vulnerabilities in accordance with its process.

  • Management Grievance The Employer may initiate a grievance at Step 3 of the grievance procedure by the Employer or designate presenting the grievance to the President of the Union or designate. Time limits and process are identical to a union grievance.

  • Emergency Management The plan shall also address the assumption of operations of the program or facility by Department in the event of Contractor's bankruptcy or financial insolvency or if Contractor is unable to operate the facility.

  • Fire Chief A formal written grievance shall be presented to the Fire Chief within thirty (30) calendar days of the date the grievant or Union knew or reasonably should have known about the actions and/or circumstances giving rise to the grievance. The Fire Chief shall investigate the grievance and meet with the grievant and Union representatives within fifteen (15) calendar days following presentation of the grievance at Step 1. The Fire Chief shall respond in writing to the grievance within five (5) calendar days following the Step 1 grievance meeting.

  • Summer Session A. All ASEs employed in the Summer Session shall receive the same general range adjustment as ASEs received in the preceding Fall term.

  • Framework Management Structure 2.1.1 The Supplier shall provide a suitably qualified nominated contact (the “Supplier Framework Manager”) who will take overall responsibility for delivering the Goods and/or Services required within this Framework Agreement, as well as a suitably qualified deputy to act in their absence.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.