Evaluation of Non-tenure Track Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Non-tenure Track. Term UNAC Bargaining Unit Members
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Non-tenure Track. Unit Members MAU rules and procedures shall provide for a performance evaluation process for non-tenure track unit members. Non-tenure track unit members shall be evaluated annually during their first three (3) years of employment at the University, then no less often than every three years, or upon a written request for an annual evaluation by the unit member to their xxxx, director or designee. A xxxx/director or designee may initiate an evaluation by giving written notice to the unit member at any time during the period of employment. The non-tenure track unit member shall submit a current CV, an activity report that includes a self-evaluation and that covers the period under review to the department head or chair, with a copy to the xxxx, director or designee at least one month prior to the date of the evaluation and no later than April 16. The evaluation process shall be separate and distinct from that of tenure track and tenured unit members. Non-tenure track unit members may not challenge a decision not to reappoint them because term appointments are expected to end at the completion date of the assignment.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Non-tenure Track

  • VISIBILITY OF FUNDING FROM THE OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE Unless the SAIDC requests or agrees otherwise, any communication or publication made by the Final Beneficiary that relates to the action, including at conferences, seminars or in any information or promotional materials (such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations in electronic form, etc.), including tangible assets acquired from the project must: (a) indicate that the action has received funding from the Official Development Assistance, SlovakAid and (b) display the SlovakAid logo. When displayed in association with another logo, the SlovakAid logo must have appropriate prominence. The obligation to display the SlovakAid logo does not confer on the Final Beneficiary a right of exclusive use. The Final Beneficiary may not appropriate the SlovakAid logo or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means. For the purposes of the first, second and third subparagraphs and under the conditions specified therein, the Final Beneficiary may use the SlovakAid logo without first obtaining permission from the SAIDC.

  • Evaluation of Contractor Performance of the Contractor under this Agreement will be evaluated. The evaluation shall be prepared on Contract/Contractor Evaluation Sheet (STD 4), and maintained in the Agreement file. For consultant agreements, a copy of the evaluation will be sent to the Department of General Services, Office of Legal Services, if it is negative and over $5,000.

  • Establishment of a Free Trade Area The Parties to this Agreement, consistent with Article XXIV of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994) and Article V of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), hereby establish a free trade area.

  • Allocation and use of scarce resources Any procedures for the allocation and use of scarce resources, including frequencies, numbers and rights of way, will be carried out in an objective, timely, transparent and non-discriminatory manner. The current state of allocated frequency bands will be made publicly available, but detailed identification of frequencies allocated for specific government uses is not required.

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Public Access to Nonprofit Records and Meetings If Contractor receives a cumulative total per year of at least $250,000 in City funds or City-administered funds and is a non-profit organization as defined in Chapter 12L of the San Francisco Administrative Code, Contractor must comply with the City’s Public Access to Nonprofit Records and Meetings requirements, as set forth in Chapter 12L of the San Francisco Administrative Code, including the remedies provided therein.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 The evaluation of the Employee’s performance will form the basis for rewarding outstanding performance or correcting unacceptable performance.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • EVALUATION OF PROJECT BENEFITS The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project. The Recipient shall:

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.