Evaluation of Historic Properties Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Historic Properties. The Heritage Professional may determine a reevaluation is necessary if, for example, new information about the property becomes available.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Historic Properties. 1.1 General Guidance Region 5 shall use the National Register criteria (36 CFR 60.4) when making determinations of eligibility; and/or Region 5 evaluation strategies for specific types of cultural resources, or Forest procedures that are or have been approved by the SHPO (Stipulation 7.7). Region 5 may use NRHP evaluation procedures documented in thematic studies or cultural resource modules previously approved by the California SHPO as individual evaluation and management programs or under prior programmatic agreements. These thematic studies or modules shall be supplemented as necessary to include any additional resources not previously considered. These thematic studies and modules also may be used in Nevada if approved by the Nevada SHPO. Such studies and modules are adopted herein by reference or may be amended to this agreement pursuant to Stipulation 12.1.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation of Historic Properties. For each property that is identified within the APE as affected by any activity described as part of Stipulation I.A, the BLM, in consultation with the Consulting Parties, will determine NRHP eligibility pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(c)(1). These may include properties of religious and cultural significance to Tribes or Tribal Organizations
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. Arizona BLM will ensure all historic properties identified within the APE, and that have not been previously evaluated for National Register eligibility or for which updated evaluations are deemed necessary, are evaluated using the National Register Criteria for Xxxxxxxxxx [00 XXX Part 60.4], BLM Manual 8110, Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Resources, BLM Manual 8140, Protecting Cultural Resources, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation [48 Fed. Reg. 447816], and National Register Bulletin 15.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. The BLM’s nPA allows more efficient (as opposed to case-by-case) consultation on the evaluation of cultural resources for National Register eligibility when the SHPOs and the BLM agree on the approach. That agreement, as expressed in this Protocol, allows the BLM to determine certain types of properties ineligible without seeking SHPO agreement on each resource determination. However, any BLM FM or CR Staff may contact the SHPO or DPO concerning ineligibility determinations when assistance or additional perspectives related to the decision would be helpful. In the case of this Protocol, the BLMs authority to determine that individual archaeological properties or built environment resources do not meet the eligibility criteria in 36 CFR § 60.4, is limited to the following procedures.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. The historic properties identified as of October 1, 2020, are listed in Appendix B of this Agreement. In total, 644 archaeological sites have been recorded within the Oak Flat Federal Parcel (selected lands), GPO project areas, and the proposed tailings location for Alternatives 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Of these, 506 sites have been determined eligible for the NRHP, and 116 sites have been determined not eligible for the NRHP. Another 21 sites are unevaluated for NRHP eligibility. One site is exempt from Section 106 consultation because they are in-use gas pipelines, per the ACHP’s Exemption Regarding Historic Preservation Review Process for Projects Involving Natural Gas Pipelines (67 Federal Register 16,364, April 5, 2002).
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. To the maximum extent feasible, all cultural resources identified within an APE for an Undertaking covered by this Agreement shall be evaluated using the National Register Criteria for Xxxxxxxxxx [00 XXX Part 60.4], BLM Manual 8110 Identifying and Evaluating Cultural Resources, BLM Manual 8140 Protecting Cultural Resources, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archaeology and Historic Preservation [48 Fed. Reg. 447816], and appropriate National Register Bulletins (NRB) (for example NRB 15, 30 and 38.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Historic Properties. A. HTNF, in consultation with the SHPO and other consulting parties as appropriate, shall make determinations of NRHP eligibility for all previously recorded (unevaluated) and newly discovered cultural resources within a Work Plan APE.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Historic Properties. 2 A. The historic properties identified as of June 6, 2019, are listed in Appendix B. In total, 3 721 archeological sites have been recorded within the Oak Flat Federal Parcel, GPO project 4 components, and the proposed tailings location for Alternatives 2, 3, 4, and 5. Of these, 523 sites have 5 been determined eligible for the NRHP, and 86 sites have been determined not eligible for the NRHP.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Historic Properties

  • Environmental Compliance and Reports Borrower shall comply in all respects with any and all Environmental Laws; not cause or permit to exist, as a result of an intentional or unintentional action or omission on Borrower's part or on the part of any third party, on property owned and/or occupied by Borrower, any environmental activity where damage may result to the environment, unless such environmental activity is pursuant to and in compliance with the conditions of a permit issued by the appropriate federal, state or local governmental authorities; shall furnish to Lender promptly and in any event within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof a copy of any notice, summons, lien, citation, directive, letter or other communication from any governmental agency or instrumentality concerning any intentional or unintentional action or omission on Borrower's part in connection with any environmental activity whether or not there is damage to the environment and/or other natural resources. Additional Assurances. Make, execute and deliver to Lender such promissory notes, mortgages, deeds of trust, security agreements, assignments, financing statements, instruments, documents and other agreements as Lender or its attorneys may reasonably request to evidence and secure the Loans and to perfect all Security Interests.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection 1. The aims of cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection will be, but not limited to, as follows: (a) establishing bilateral cooperation relations in the forestry sector; (b) developing a training program and studies for sustainable management of forests; (c) improving the rehabilitation and sustainable management of forest with the aim of increasing carbon sinks and reduce the impact of climate change in the Asia-Pacific region; (d) cooperating on the execution of national projects, aimed at: improving the management of forest plantations for its transformation for industrial purposes and environmental protection; (e) elaborating studies on sustainable use of timber; (f) developing new technologies for the transformation and processing of timber and non-timber species; and (g) improving cooperation in agro-forestry technologies. 2. To achieve the objectives of the Article 149 (Objectives), the Parties may focus, as a means of cooperation and negotiations on concluding a bilateral agreement on forestry cooperation between the two Parties. Such collaboration will be as follows: (a) exchanges on science and technology as well as policies and laws relating the sustainable use of forest resources; (b) cooperation in training programs, internships, exchange of experts and projects advisory; (c) advice and technical assistance to public institutions and organizations of the Parties on sustainable use of forest resources and environmental protection; (d) facilitating forest policy dialogue and technical cooperation under the Network of Sustainable Forest Management and Forest Rehabilitation in Asia- Pacific Region, initiated at the 15th Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Meeting; (e) encouraging joint studies, working visits, exchange of experiences, among others; and (f) others activities mutually agreed.

  • Environmental Audits and Reports As soon as practicable following receipt thereof, copies of all material environmental audits, investigations, analyses and reports of any kind or character, whether prepared by personnel of Company or any of its Subsidiaries or by independent consultants, Government Authorities or any other Persons, with respect to significant environmental matters at any Facility that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect or with respect to any Environmental Claims that, individually or in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to result in a Material Adverse Effect;

  • Report on Assessment of Compliance and Attestation (a) On or before March 1 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, the Servicer shall:

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Annual Reports on Assessment of Compliance with Servicing Criteria (a) On or before March 1 of each year commencing in March 2018, the Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, each at its own expense, shall furnish (and each of the preceding parties, as applicable, (i) with respect to any Servicing Function Participant of such party that is a Mortgage Loan Seller Sub-Servicer, shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish, and (ii) with respect to any other Servicing Function Participant of such party (other than any party to this Agreement), shall cause such Servicing Function Participant to furnish) (each Master Servicer, the Special Servicer, the Certificate Administrator, the Custodian, the Operating Advisor, any Servicing Function Participant and, if it has made (or is required to make) an Advance during the applicable calendar year, the Trustee, as the case may be, a “Reporting Servicer”) to the Certificate Administrator, the Trustee, the Serviced Companion Loan Holders (or, in the case of a Serviced Companion Loan that is part of an Other Securitization Trust, the applicable Other Depositor and Other Exchange Act Reporting Party), the Operating Advisor (only in the case of a report furnished by the Special Servicer) and the Depositor, a report on an assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria (together with a copy thereof in XXXXX-Compatible Format, or in such other format as otherwise agreed upon by the Depositor, the Certificate Administrator, the applicable Other Depositor, the applicable Other Exchange Act Reporting Party and the applicable Certifying Servicer) that complies in all material respects with the requirements of Item 1122 of Regulation AB and contains (A) a statement by such Reporting Servicer of its responsibility for assessing compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (B) a statement that such Reporting Servicer used the Servicing Criteria to assess compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, (C) such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of the end of and for the preceding calendar year, including, if there has been any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, a discussion of each such failure and the nature and status thereof and (D) a statement that a registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on such Reporting Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of and for such period. Copies of all compliance reports delivered pursuant to this Section 10.09 shall be provided to any Certificateholder, upon the written request thereof, by the Certificate Administrator. Each such report shall be addressed to the Depositor and each Other Depositor (if addressed) and signed by an authorized officer of the applicable company, and shall address each of the Relevant Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit O to this Agreement delivered to the Depositor on the Closing Date. Promptly after receipt of each such report, (i) the Depositor and each Other Depositor may review each such report and, if applicable, consult with the each Reporting Servicer as to the nature of any material instance of noncompliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria, and (ii) the Certificate Administrator shall confirm that the assessments, taken individually address the Relevant Servicing Criteria for each party as set forth on Exhibit O to this Agreement and notify the Depositor of any exceptions. For the avoidance of doubt, the Trustee shall have no obligation or duty to determine whether any such report (other than any such report furnished by the Trustee or any Servicing Function Participant of the Trustee) is in form and substance in compliance with the requirements of Regulation AB.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Fund Valuation and Financial Reporting Services (1) Account for Fund share purchases, sales, exchanges, transfers, dividend reinvestments, and other Fund share activity as reported by the Fund’s transfer agent on a timely basis.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.