E.-H Sample Clauses

E.-H. T., Xxxxxxxxxx, X., & Xxxxxx, J. (2018). Internet-and mobile-based psychological inter- ventions: Applications, efficacy, and potential for improving mental health. European Psychologist, 23 (2), 167–187. https://xxx.xxx/10.1027/1016-9040/a000318 Xxxx, X. X., Xxxxx, N., Xxxxxx, J. J., Xxxxxx, X. X., Xxxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, M., Xxxxxx, X. X., Xxxx, X. X., & Xxxxxx, X. X. (2017). Recovery from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa at 22-year follow-up. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78 (2), 184–189. https://xxx.xxx/10.4088/JCP.15m10393 Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxx, X., Xxxx, X. X., & Xxxxxxxxxx, D. G. T. (2017). An inves- tigation of the overlap between the ICECAP-A and five preference-based health- related quality of life instruments. PharmacoEconomics, 35 (7), 741–753. https : //xxx.xxx/10.1007/s40273-017-0491-7 Erskine, H. E., Xxxxxxxxx, X. X., & Xxxx, X. X. (2016). The global burden of eating disorders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 29 (6), 346–353. https://xxx.xxx/10.1097/YCO. 0000000000000276 European Values Study. (2017). Atlas of european values. https://www.atlasofeuropeanvalues. eu/maptool.html EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16 (e), 199–208. https://xxx.xxx/10.1016/0168- 8510(90)90421-9 Everaert, X., Xxxxxx, E. H. W., Xxxxxxx, X., & Xx Xxxxx, R. (2010). Evaluatie van de psy- chometrische eigenschappen van xx xxxxxxxxx zelfwaardeschaal in een poliklinisch psychiatrische populatie. Gedragstherapie, 43, 307–317. Xxxxx, S., Xxxxxxxx, M., Xx Xxx, H., Xxx Xxxxxx, M., & Xxxxx, A. (2005). Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on health economic criteria. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 21 (2), 240–245. https://xxx.xxx/10.1017/X0000000000000000 Xxxxxx, M. A. B., Xxxx, M. H., Xxxxxxx, A. M., & Xxxxxx, I. (2017). Societal perspective in economic evaluation. International Journal of Public Health and Clinical Sciences, 4 (4), 41–50. Xxxxxxxx, X. X., & Xxxxxx, X. X. (2008). Assessment of eating disorders: Interview or self-report questionnaire? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16 (4), 363–370. https: ⟨ ⟩ //xxx.xxx/10.1002/1098-108X(199412)16:4 363::AID-EAT2260160405 0.0.XX;2- %23 Xxxx, Y. S., Xxxxxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X. X., & Xxxxxxxx, I. (2021). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 30 ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
E.-H. 9 ح,-az1 >

Related to E.-H

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.

  • Monitoring and Compliance Every year during the term of this Agreement on the anniversary date of the effective date of the Agreement, the Restaurant shall provide to the United States a narrative report of the actions taken during the reporting period to remove any barriers to access and otherwise enhance accessibility for individuals with disabilities at the Restaurant and any plans for action concerning ADA compliance in the coming year. The report shall include as an exhibit copies of any complaint, whether formal or informal, received during the reporting period alleging that the Restaurant was not being operated in compliance with the ADA or otherwise discriminated against any person on account of disability. The Owner and Operator of the Restaurant shall cooperate in good faith with any and all reasonable requests by the United States for access to the Restaurant and for information and documents concerning the Restaurant's compliance with this Agreement and the ADA. The United States shall have the right to verify compliance with this Agreement and the ADA, both as set forth in this Agreement and through any means available to the general public, including visits to the public areas of the Restaurant and communications with Restaurant staff. The United States shall have the right to inspect the facility at any time, and counsel for the United States need not identify themselves in the course of visits to the public areas.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

  • REPORTING AND EVALUATION The Provider agrees to comply with 7 AAC 81.120, Confidentiality and 7 AAC 81.150, Reports, and other applicable state or federal law regarding the submission of information, including the provisions of Section VI of this Agreement. The Provider agrees to submit any reporting information required under this Agreement and to make available information deemed necessary by DHSS to evaluate the efficacy of service delivery or compliance with applicable state or federal statutes or regulations. The Provider agrees to provide state officials and their representatives access to facilities, systems, books and records, for the purpose of monitoring compliance with this Agreement and evaluating services provided under this Agreement. On-site Quality Assurance Reviews may be conducted by DHSS staff to ensure compliance with service protocols. The Provider will ensure that DHSS staff has access to program files for the purposes of follow-up, quality assurance monitoring and fiscal administration of the program.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Licensing and Certification The Grantee shall ensure that all licensed and/or certified staff maintain a current license and/or certification if the programs and services associated with State Aid Commitment Diversion funds require professional licensure or certification.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Enterprise Information Management Standards Grantee shall conform to HHS standards for data management as described by the policies of the HHS Office of Data, Analytics, and Performance. These include, but are not limited to, standards for documentation and communication of data models, metadata, and other data definition methods that are required by HHS for ongoing data governance, strategic portfolio analysis, interoperability planning, and valuation of HHS System data assets.

  • COMPLIANCE AND CERTIFICATION 25.1 Each Party shall comply at its own expense with all Applicable Laws that relate to that Party’s obligations to the other Party under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring or permitting either Party to contravene any mandatory requirement of Applicable Law.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.