Current Status definition

Current Status means an account status or rating indicating that, as of the
Current Status. The WAP continues its efforts to:
Current Status. The pilot plant has been constructed, and is being operated to collect data. An experimental system for intake and discharge using pipelines installed under the sea bed has been installed and is being evaluated.

Examples of Current Status in a sentence

  • Current Status of Significant Industrial Wastewater Violation(s) in the Service Area of the NSWRD.

  • Presented Current Status of Significant Industrial Wastewater Violation(s) in the Service Area of the NSSD.

  • Current Status and Actions to be UndertakenThis beneficial use is currently impaired.

  • Portenoy, Opioid Therapy for Chronic Nonmalignant Pain: Current Status, 1 Progress in Pain Res.

  • Current Status of Significant Industrial Wastewater Violation(s) in the Service Area of the NSSD.


More Definitions of Current Status

Current Status. A Final EIS was completed in May 2006. A Record of Decision was completed in March 2007. Federal costs of drainage service alternatives exceed $2 billion, exceeding the authorized appropriation ceiling contained in the San Xxxx Act. Meanwhile, Reclamation has continued to support on the ground drainage projects including the Grassland Bypass Project while these long term solutions are pursued. The Grassland Bypass Project provides drainage to the northerly San Xxxx Unit and adjacent area and includes actions consistent with both Reclamation’s Feasibility Report alternative and the alternative resolution concepts under consideration. The project has broad support among all stakeholders including the environmental community.
Current Status. The LRP has acquired approximately 9,300 acres to date, and retired approximately 8,900 acres from irrigated agricultural production. In 2008, the program restored 320 acres to upland wildlife habitat. Implementation of the LRDP has eliminated the production of approximately 3,600 acre feet of poor quality drain water annually. On average, the LRP has exceeded its land restoration performance goal of 400 acres per year. Since 1998, the LRP has restored approximately 5,300 acres. Restoration efforts on retired lands immediately increased biodiversity and abundance, including Special Status Species. Wildlife surveys of restored units observed important findings of sensitive San Xxxxxxx Valley wildlife species, including populations of endangered Xxxxxx kangaroo rats, burrowing owls, coast horned lizards, San Xxxxxxx Valley Coachwhips, Swainson’s hawks and a sensitive plant called Xxxxxx’x Woolystar.
Current Status. Reclamation has supported implementation of the WRDP. To date, Reclamation has contributed 12 percent of the overall funding for the purchase of 5,800 acres and development of 3,800 of those acres into reuse areas. In 2009-2012, the remaining 2,000 acres will be developed into reuse areas, meeting the interim goal of 6,000 acres of reuse area. Funding has also supported improving distribution efficiencies (eliminating leaks), piloting treatment technologies, and reducing groundwater impacts. As a result, in 2007 about 61 thousand tons of salt were prevented from entering the San Joaquin River.
Current Status. The Sacramento Basin Program has completed the first cycle, and is preparing for its second cycle. Recent activity has focused on the evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) transported by the Sacramento River into the Delta and its effects on drinking water quality. The CALFED Drinking Water Program needs information on DOC concentrations and loads to the Delta. This project will provide critical information on the long-term trends in carbon loading and will improve the accuracy of flow measurements from the upstream sources.
Current Status. A question has come up regarding legality of superintendents serving on the board. A letter was requested and received from the State Department of Education stating that having superintendents serve on our governing board is in violation of California Education Code 52301. Our legal counsel also issued an opinion.
Current Status. The SMPA agencies propose to amend the Revised SMPA to establish a Preservation Agreement Improvement Fund, that would support cost sharing for improvement of managed wetland facilities and finance activities currently funded under the Joint Use Facilities Fund under a single cost sharing mechanism. The managed wetland facilities improvement element of the proposed fund would include a 75/25 cost share program providing funds for infrastructure improvements necessary to meet the 30-day flood and drain cycle described in individual management plans, potentially including purchase and installation of new, larger, lowered, or relocated discharge facilities. The managed wetland facilities improvement element of the proposed fund would also include a 50/50 cost share program providing funds for management and infrastructure improvements necessary to meet recommendations described in the individual management plans to improve leaching and drainage efficiency. Eligible activities would include cleaning, widening and deepening primary and secondary ditches, adding v-ditches or drainage xxxxxx, raising elevations of pond bottom sinks, installation or improvement of interior water control structures, coring of interior levees, offsetting electrical and fuel costs for portable and stationary pumps during spring leaching periods, and fish screen electrical costs. The Joint Use Facility Improvements element of the proposed fund would provide financing on a 75/25 cost share basis for infrastructure improvement to increase efficient and cooperative use of joint use water delivery systems to managed wetlands, including construction of or improvements to: interior levees, water conveyance ditches, water control structures, and permanent pumps. Funded activities include newly constructed facilities or improvements to existing facilities. Reclamation is also a principal participant with the other SMPA signatories and other interested agencies in developing a regional plan that balances implementation of the CALFED Program, SMPA and other management and restoration programs within Suisun Xxxxx in a manner responsive to the concerns of stakeholders and based upon voluntary participation by private landowners. Reclamation is currently participating in development of a draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR) for the Suisun Xxxxx Plan, which will include environmental compliance documentation for implementation of the proposed amendment to the R...
Current Status. The program is currently in the process of completing three recovery plans. Plans currently under development include a final draft plan for the giant garter snake, a second draft plan for Chaparral communities in the east SF Bay area, and a draft tidal xxxxx recovery plan for northern and central California. The Recovery Program continues an annual schedule of writing 5-year reviews of listed species found within the jurisdiction of the Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office. Twenty 5-year reviews were finalized in 2009, including the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Callippe silverspot butterfly, Xxxxx Xxxx’x milk-vetch, hairy Orcutt grass, Kenwood Xxxxx checkermallow, Lake County stonecrop, Loch Lomond coyote thistle, palmate-bracted bird’s-beak, Pitkin Xxxxx xxxx, Shasta crayfish, Springville clarkia, white sedge, Delta green ground beetle, Xxxxxx’x spurge, large- flowered fiddleneck, many-flowered navarretia, Xxxxxx’s silverspot butterfly, soft bird’s-beak, Xxxxxx grass and Suisun thistle. We also developed 5-year action plans for the Antioch Dunes evening-primrose, Contra Costa wallflower, Delta smelt, Xxxxx’x metalmark butterfly, and valley elderberry longhorn beetle In addition to recovery planning, research and numerous on-the-ground recovery actions are on- going, or have been completed. For example, the Implementation Team for the Vernal Pool Recovery Plan has been formed and is currently updating baseline data and establishing geographic working groups; full-scale captive propagation and reintroduction programs are on- going for the riparian brush rabbit and the Xxxxx’x metalmark butterfly; removal of invasive plant species; habitat restoration for the riparian brush rabbit and giant garter snake; and numerous projects involving seed collection, storage, reintroduction, and research for numerous listed plant species. In addition, a research project in support of conservation has been initiated to determine the genetic relationships among vernal pool complexes for the vernal pool fairy shrimp. The Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office received $2,320,099 and the Bay-Delta Fish and Wildlife Office received $200,000 for the Endangered Species Recovery Program in FY 2009. The level of Endangered Species recovery program funds obligated to projects are based on two factors, availability of funds and project proposals. Project selection is competitive and the level awarded varies annually; thus, funding amounts and locations of future projects cannot be project...