DISCUSSION OF DECISION CRITERIA Sample Clauses

DISCUSSION OF DECISION CRITERIA. The DNR Commissioner reviews unit expansion applications under AS 38.05.180(p) and 11 AAC 83.303. The Commissioner will approve a proposed unit expansion if the commissioner finds that it will conserve the natural resources of an oil or gas reservoir and is necessary or advisable to protect the public interest. To approve a proposed unit expansion, the commissioner must find that the proposed unit will: 1) promote the conservation of all natural resources; 2) promote the prevention of economic and physical waste; and 3) provide for the protection of all parties of interest, including the state.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DISCUSSION OF DECISION CRITERIA. AS 38.05.180(p) gives DNR the authority to approve an oil and gas unit. The Commissioner of DNR (Commissioner) reviews unit applications under 11 AAC 83.301 – 11 AAC 83.395. By memorandum dated September 30, 1999, the Commissioner approved a revision of Department Order 003 and delegated this authority to the Director of the Division of Oil and Gas. The Division’s review of the Application is based on the criteria set out in 11 AAC 83.303 (a) and (b). A discussion of the subsection (b) criteria, as they apply to the Application, is set out directly below, followed by a discussion of the subsection (a) criteria.
Sample 1
DISCUSSION OF DECISION CRITERIA. A unit may be formed to conserve the natural resources of all or a part of an oil or gas pool, field, or like area when determined and certified to be necessary or advisable in the public interest. AS 38.05.180(p). The commissioner will approve a proposed unit upon a finding that it will (1) promote conservation of all natural resources, including all or part of an oil or gas pool, field, or like area; (2) promote the prevention of economic and physical waste; and (3) provide for the protection of all parties of interest including the state. In evaluating these three criteria, the commissioner will consider:
Sample 1

Related to DISCUSSION OF DECISION CRITERIA

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Impartial Decisions The Design Professional is the interpreter of the conditions of the Construction Contract and the judge of its performance, in the first instance. The Design Professional shall side neither with the Owner nor with the Contractor, but shall use its powers to enforce performance by both.

  • Written Decisions Decisions rendered at Level One which are unsatisfactory to the aggrieved person and all decisions rendered at Levels Two and Three of the grievance procedure shall be in writing setting forth the decision and the reasons therefore, and shall be transmitted promptly to all parties in interest and to the Association.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Hiring Decisions Contractor shall make the final determination of whether an Economically Disadvantaged Individual referred by the System is "qualified" for the position.

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Disagreement on Decision Should the parties disagree as to the meaning of the Board's decision, either party may apply to the Chairperson of the Board of Arbitration to reconvene the Board to clarify the decision, which it shall do within five (5) days.

  • Notice of Decision The Plan Administrator shall notify the claimant in writing of its decision on review. The Plan Administrator shall write the notification in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant. The notification shall set forth:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.