Collaboration and Decision Making Support services Sample Clauses

Collaboration and Decision Making Support services. (integrated in the Workbench service) CGRA evaluators used the service and completed the related Dicode Evaluation Framework Questionnaires. Figures 3.2.2.1, 3.2.2.2, 3.2.2.3, summarize the evaluators’ responses relative to the quality, acceptability, accessibility and usability of the Workbench Collaboration and Decision Making services. In these figures, the median and mode values of the evaluators’ responses are shown, originally given in a 1-5 scale. The highest values are observed for the quality and accessibility of the Workbench Collaboration and Decision Making services. Regarding the overall quality, evaluators agree that the objectives of the service are met (median=4, mode=3), the service is novel to their knowledge (median=4, mode=4), they are satisfied with the performance of the service as well as overall with this service (median=4, mode=4). The lowest mode value is given for the data intensive decision making issues addressed by the service. In the acceptability graph, Figure 3.2.2.2, we can observe that evaluators generally found all the functions they expected (median=4, mode=3), the interface of the service was pleasant (median=4, mode=4), and subsequently they would most probably recommend the service to their peers/ community (median=4, mode=3). Also, apart for the pleasant interface, a high mode value of 4 can be seen for the usefulness of the service (helpful to their work). Regarding the accessibility and other issues shown in Figure 3.2.2.3, the evaluators generally agree in that they are satisfied with the access given to this Dicode service (median=4, mode=4), they are satisfied with the instruction given by this Dicode service (median=4, mode=4) and that they are satisfied with the time spend to learn to use the provided solution (median=4, mode=4). The evaluators’ opinion regarding their satisfaction with the ease of use of the solution to complete their tasks appears to exceed the average (median and mode values of 3). Particularly, evaluator’s comments ranged from ‘it was not such easy’ [sic] (GR33) to ‘This solution is very easy to use and complete complex tasks’ (GR32). The suggested scenario seemed to have been understood well by the evaluators, although some extra instructions were thought to be necessary by some reviewers. Overall reviewers found the service ‘promising’ (ES12). Some technical issues were raised: ‘It's very useful for a complex use case. I'd also like to move with mouse holding left click’ (GR32), ‘A bit ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Collaboration and Decision Making Support services

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Development Services During the term of this Agreement, the Provider agrees to provide to or on behalf of the Port the professional services and related items described in Exhibit A (collectively, the “Development Services”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Provider specifically agrees to include at least one Port representative in any economic development negotiations or discussions in which the Provider is involved concerning (i) a port-related business prospect or (ii) a business transaction which will ultimately require Port involvement, financial or otherwise.

  • Support Services HP’s support services will be described in the applicable Supporting Material, which will cover the description of HP’s offering, eligibility requirements, service limitations and Customer responsibilities, as well as the Customer systems supported.

  • Extended Support Services As long as funding is available (through FFFS, etc.), the district will provide the following supportive services for individuals who are eligible under the TANF Services 200% of poverty eligibility guidelines: Services listed in the supportive services attachment are provided to TANF, SNAP and 200% eligible individuals.

  • Technical Support Services 2.1 The technical support services (the "Services"): Party A agrees to provide to Party B the relevant services requested by Party B, which are specified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Exhibit 1").

  • Academic Policies and Student Support Services X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies and procedures as the courses outlined in the Hill College policy manual, catalog, and student handbook. [TAC 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter D, 4.85(g)(1)]

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • Design Development Phase Services 3.3.1 Based on the Owner’s approval of the Schematic Design Documents, and on the Owner’s authorization of any adjustments in the Project requirements and the budget for the Cost of the Work, the Architect shall prepare Design Development Documents for the Owner’s approval. The Design Development Documents shall illustrate and describe the development of the approved Schematic Design Documents and shall consist of drawings and other documents including plans, sections, elevations, typical construction details, and diagrammatic layouts of building systems to fix and describe the size and character of the Project as to architectural, structural, mechanical and electrical systems, and other appropriate elements. The Design Development Documents shall also include outline specifications that identify major materials and systems and establish, in general, their quality levels.

  • COMPENSATION FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 5.1 For the Construction Manager’s performance of the Work as described in Section 2.3, the Owner shall pay the Construction Manager the Contract Sum in current funds. The Contract Sum is the Cost of the Work as defined in Section 6.1.1 plus the Construction Manager’s Fee.

  • Implementation and Review The Parties shall consult annually, or as otherwise agreed, to review the implementation of this Chapter and consider other matters of mutual interest affecting trade in services. (10) 10 Such consultations will be addressed under Article 170 (Free Trade Commission) of Chapter 14 (Administration of the Agreement).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.