Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process Sample Clauses

Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be emailed 36 hours from the time that the Exam was completed. The Linux Foundation and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). The Linux Foundation will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. The Linux Foundation reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to The Linux Foundation or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If The Linux Foundation determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. LF and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). LF will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. LF reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to LF or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If LF determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Following completion of your exam, you will be provided a Preliminary Score Report indicating an exam score which will be reviewed, along with other information in your exam record, before an official score is issued. You may view your official exam score at xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx within 72 hours of your exam appointment. Cisco and/or the Testing Delivery Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to Cisco or the Testing Delivery Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid, you will be advised of options for retaking the examination, provided however, if Cisco reasonably determines that your response patterns are indicative of possible misconduct, then Cisco may invalidate your score and consider your actions as a violation of Section 4.1 (Candidate Conduct Policy).
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. OSF and/or the Exam Proctoring Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). OSF will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. OSF reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to OSF or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If OSF determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1Sample 2
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Upon completion, exams are scored automatically and a score report will be made available within 3 business days. OpenStack and/or an Exam Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest that your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (measurement error). OpenStack will use statistical analyses of exam data (“Data Forensics”) to identify patterns indicative of test fraud including cheating and piracy. OpenStack reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and certification result if review of your exam record reveals scoring inaccuracies (attributable to OpenStack or the Exam Proctoring Partner) or response patterns indicative of possible misconduct or measurement error. If OpenStack determines that an Exam score is invalid due to issues that are beyond the control of the candidate, the candidate will be advised of options to retake the Exam at no charge.
Sample 1
Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process. Following completion of your exam, you may be provided with a preliminary score report indicating an exam score; however, this is not your official score. You may view your official exam score at xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/xxxxxxxxxxxx. Due to the various levels of difficulty and complexity of exams, official exam scores may take time to post after your exam appointment. Cisco and/or the Testing Delivery Partner will review your exam record for scoring accuracy, for evidence of possible misconduct, and for response patterns that may suggest your scores do not represent a valid measure of your knowledge or competence as sampled by the examination (“Measurement Error”). Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your exam score and Certification result, even after your official exam score has been posted on such website if the review of your exam record reveals (i) scoring inaccuracies (attributable to Cisco or to the Testing Delivery Partner) or (ii) response patterns indicative of possible misconduct on your part or (iii) response patterns indicative of possible Measurement Error(s). If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid due to scoring errors or Measurement Error(s), you will be advised of options for retaking the examination. If Cisco determines that your exam score is invalid due to possible misconduct on your part, Cisco reserves the right to invalidate your score and consider your actions in violation of Exhibit 1 to this Agreement. YOU SHALL ADHERE TO ALL PROGRAM RULES AND SHALL NOT AT ANY TIME, WHETHER FOR YOUR BENEFIT OR THE BENEFIT OF OTHERS, ENGAGE IN ANY ACTION TO SUBVERT, OR ATTEMPT TO SUBVERT, THE EXAMINATION PROCESS.
Sample 1

Related to Accuracy and Integrity of Examination Process

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum.

  • Examination of Implementation 1. Without prejudice to the procedures set out in Article 188 (Compensation), once the period of time set out in paragraph 3 of Article 186 (Implementation of the Report) has expired, and there is disagreement between the disputing Parties as to the existence or consistency of the measures taken to comply with the Panel report, such dispute shall be referred to the original Panel wherever possible. If not possible, the procedure pursuant to Article 179 (Panel Selection) shall be followed to appoint a new Panel, in which event the periods set out thereof shall be reduced by half (22). 2. This Panel shall issue its report on the matter within 60 days after the date of the referral of the matter to it. When the Panel considers that it cannot provide its report within this timeframe, it shall inform the Parties in writing of the reasons for the delay together with an estimate of the period within which it will submit its report. Any delay shall not exceed a further period of 30 days unless the Parties otherwise agree.

  • Data Protection Impact Assessment and Prior Consultation Processor shall provide reasonable assistance to the Company with any data protection impact assessments, and prior consultations with Supervising Authorities or other competent data privacy authorities, which Company reasonably considers to be required by article 35 or 36 of the GDPR or equivalent provisions of any other Data Protection Law, in each case solely in relation to Processing of Company Personal Data by, and taking into account the nature of the Processing and information available to, the Contracted Processors.

  • County Review and Approval of Insurance Requirements The County reserves the right to review and adjust the Required Insurance provisions, conditioned upon County’s determination of changes in risk exposures.

  • Evaluation Process A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of the employee’s probationary, trial services, transition, and annual review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.