VALE S Sample Clauses
The "VALE S" clause typically serves to establish the terms under which a party acknowledges receipt of goods, services, or payments. In practice, this clause may require the recipient to confirm delivery or completion by signing a document or providing written confirmation, which can be used as proof in case of disputes. Its core function is to provide clear evidence of fulfillment of contractual obligations, thereby reducing the risk of misunderstandings or disagreements between the parties.
VALE S. A., et al., 1:16-cv-658.
B. By Order dated March 7, 2016, the Court (the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Woods) ordered that the cases be consolidated under the caption In re: Vale S.
A. Securities Litigation, 1:15- cv-9539-GHW (the “Action”); appointed ACERA and OCERS as Lead Plaintiffs for the Action; and approved Lead Plaintiffs’ selection of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Litowitz ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ LLP as Lead Counsel for the class.
C. On April 29, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs filed and served their Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) asserting claims against all Defendants under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and against the Individual Defendants under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Among other things, the Complaint alleged that Defendants made materially false and misleading statements about Vale’s mining business; Vale’s risk mitigation plans, policies, and procedures; and Vale’s responsibility for the collapse of the Fundão Dam. The Complaint further alleged that the price of Vale’s ADRs was artificially inflated as a result of Defendants’ allegedly false and misleading statements, and declined when the truth was revealed.
D. On July 25, 2016, Defendants served a motion to dismiss the Complaint. On August 29, 2016, Lead Plaintiffs served their memorandum of law in opposition to this motion and, on September 12, 2016, Defendants served their reply papers.
E. On March 23, 2017, the Court issued its Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss the Complaint.
F. On April 6, 2017, Defendants moved for reconsideration of portions of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order. On April 20, 2017, Lead Plaintiffs filed their opposition to Defendants’ motion for reconsideration. The Court heard oral argument on the motion during a status conference held on April 14, 2017.
G. On May 26, 2017, the Court issued its Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motion for reconsideration.
H. On July 7, 2017, Defendants filed and served their Answer to the Complaint.
I. Discovery in the Action commenced in May 2017. Defendants and third parties produced more than 1.35 million pages of documents to Lead Plaintiffs. Lead Plaintiffs produced over 23,000 pages of documents to Defendants. Lead Plaintiffs also obtained documents and sworn testimony from third-parties in Brazil pursuant to Letters Rogatory issued by the Court. Defendants an...
VALE S. A., a corporation, with head office in the City of Rio de Janeiro, State of Rio de Janeiro, at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, no. 26, Zip Code 20030-900, enrolled with the Brazilian Federal Taxpayers’ Registry (CNPJ/MF) under No. 33.592.510/0001-54, herein represented pursuant to its By-laws, hereinafter referred to as “Vale”;
VALE S. A., a company registered under the laws of Brazil, with its principal office in ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ("Vale" and, together with BSGR, the "Parties"); and
VALE S. A. President
VALE S. A., a company registered under the laws of Brazil, with its principal office in ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 26, 20.300-900, Rio ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇, Brasil ("Vale" and, together with BSGR, the "Parties").