The City of St Sample Clauses

The City of St. Petersburg and the Union agree that maintaining the confidence of the citizens in their Law Enforcement Officers is of utmost importance. One vehicle for demonstrating the integrity of these employees is through a random drug testing program. Further, a random drug testing program reinforces the City's policy that its employees shall not use illegal drugs, or abuse alcohol or those drugs taken by prescription.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (12)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
The City of St. Petersburg hereby recognizes the Sun Coast Police Benevolent Association as the exclusive bargaining agent for the purpose of good faith collective bargaining with respect to wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment for all employees in the bargaining unit.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (11)
The City of St. Petersburg hereby recognizes the Florida Public Services Union (FPSU) SEIU,CtW, CLC, as the exclusive representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with respect to wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment for all employees in the Bargaining Units.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
The City of St. Xxxxxxx will give the employee a written policy statement explaining the policy about drugs in the workplace.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
The City of St. Petersburg hereby recognizes Local 1220 as the exclusive representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with respect to wages, hours and terms and conditions of employment for all employees in the bargaining unit.
Sample 1
The City of St. Xxxxxx, No. 3:21-cv-02493-WHO (N.D. Cal.) (“Action”);
Sample 1
The City of St. Xxxxxxx xxx require a second or third opinion (at its own expense), periodic reports on the sergeant’s status and intent to return to work, and a fitness-for-duty report to return to work.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The City of St

  • Jurisdiction of Courts Québec hereby appoints the person from time to time who holds the position of Delegate General of Québec in New York, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx xxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000-0000, as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action by any Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in The City of New York, and expressly accepts the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Québec hereby irrevocably waives any immunity to service of process in respect of any such action to which the Authorized Agent might otherwise be entitled. Such appointment shall be irrevocable as long as any of the Securities remain outstanding, except that, if for any reason the Authorized Agent ceases to be able to act as agent or no longer has an address in The City of New York, Québec will appoint another person or persons in The City of New York, selected in its discretion, as Authorized Agent(s). Québec will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent together with written notice of such service mailed or delivered to Québec at its address set forth in Section 11, shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon Québec. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by an Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement may be instituted in any competent court in Québec. Québec hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any immunity to jurisdiction to which it might otherwise be entitled in any action based on this Agreement which may be instituted as provided in this Section in any State or Federal court in The City of New York or in any competent court in Québec.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.