SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION Sample Clauses

SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION. A. After an employee has three (3) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluations under provisions of this Agreement, the principal or other evaluator may elect to use a short form of evaluation (see Appendix C2 or C3). The short form of evaluation shall consist of either a thirty (30) minute observation during the school year with a written summary or a final annual written evaluation based on the evaluation criteria and based on at least two (2) observation periods during the school year totaling at least sixty (60) minutes without a written summary of such observations being prepared.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION. 1. All employees who contract again with the District after their first three (3) years of service in the Newport School District shall be defined as continuing employees and may be evaluated pursuant to this Article.
Sample 1Sample 2
SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION. After an employee has four (4) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluations under provisions of this Agreement, the principal or other supervisor may elect to use a short form of evaluation (see Appendix B-5). The short form of evaluation shall consist of either a thirty (30) minute observation during the school year with a written summary or a final annual written evaluation based on the teacher evaluation criteria and based on at least two (2) observation periods during the school year totaling at least sixty (60) minutes without a written summary of such observations being prepared. However, the normal evaluation process set forth in Section 4 of this Article shall be followed at least once every three (3) years for each employee, and an employee or principal or other supervisor may request that the normal evaluation process be conducted in any given school year. The short form evaluation process may not be used as a basis for determining that an employee's work is unsatisfactory nor as probable cause for non-renewal of the employee's employment contract.
Sample 1
SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION. A. After a regular employee has four (4) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluations under provisions of this Agreement, the principal or other evaluator and the affected employee must mutually agree to use a short form of evaluation. (see Appendix B-8) The principal or other supervisor shall notify each selected employee on or before October 1 that the employee may be evaluated by the short form.
Sample 1
SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION. After an Employee has four (4) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluations under provisions of this Agreement, the principal or other supervisor may elect to use a short form of evaluation. The short form of evaluation shall consist of either a thirty (30) minute observation during the school year with a written summary or a final annual written evaluation based on the teacher evaluation criteria and based on at least two (2) observation periods during the school year totaling at least sixty (60) minutes without a written summary of such observations being prepared. The normal evaluation process set forth in this Agreement shall be followed at least once every three (3) years for each Employee; provided, however, that the principal or other supervisor may determine that the normal evaluation process be conducted in any given school year. The short form evaluation process may not be used as a basis for determining that an Employee's work is unsatisfactory or is probable cause for non-renewal of the Employee's contract.
Sample 1

Related to SHORT FORM OF EVALUATION

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Form of Agreement If a vendor submitting an Proposal requires TIPS and/or TIPS Member to sign an additional agreement, a copy of the proposed agreement must be included with the proposal. In response to submitted supplemental Vendor Agreement documents, TIPS will review proposed vendor Agreement documents. Supplemental Vendor’s Agreement documents shall not become part of TIPS’s Agreement with vendor unless and until an authorized representative of TIPS reviews and approves it.

  • Comprehensive Evaluation The Comprehensive evaluation is a growth-oriented, teacher/evaluator collaborative process that requires teachers to be evaluated on the eight (8) state criteria. A teacher must complete a Comprehensive evaluation once every four (4) years. Subsequent years they will be evaluated on a Focused evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.