Short-Form Evaluation Process Clause Samples

The Short-Form Evaluation Process clause establishes a streamlined method for assessing proposals, products, or services, typically in situations where a full, detailed evaluation is unnecessary or impractical. This process often involves simplified criteria, reduced documentation requirements, and faster decision timelines, making it suitable for low-value contracts or pilot projects. Its core function is to expedite decision-making and reduce administrative burden, ensuring efficiency while still maintaining a basic level of due diligence.
Short-Form Evaluation Process. 22 After four (4) years of satisfactory long-form evaluations, the supervisor and employee 23 may mutually agree to participate in the short-form evaluation process. The short-form 24 evaluation (Appendix E-6) shall consist of: 26 1. One 30-minute observation with a written summary, or 27 2. Two observation periods totaling at least 60 minutes without written summary, 28 but with a final annual written evaluation. 29 30 Long-form evaluations must occur at least once every six (6) years. The employee may 31 request a long-form evaluation at any time. No employee shall be required or requested 32 to participate in a short-form evaluation process. The short-form evaluation process may 33 not be used for determining unsatisfactory work, nor as probable cause for non-renewal. 34
View SourceView Similar (6)
Short-Form Evaluation Process. The short form is an alternative evaluation process that may be used after the employee has received four (4) years of satisfactory in-district evaluations. Formal written request to use the short form process must be indicated by the staff member and approved by the evaluator prior to October 1 each year. A staff member may remain on the short form for up to four consecutive years with the approval of the evaluator, at which time the staff member will return to the long form process for a minimum of one (1) year before a return to the short form. A return to the short form must follow the approval process set forth in this section. The short-form evaluation process will consist of one of the following as a minimum:
View SourceView Similar (3)
Short-Form Evaluation Process. 33 The short form of evaluation shall include either a 30-minute observation during the school year with
View SourceView Similar (3)
Short-Form Evaluation Process. 26 The short form of evaluation shall include either a 30-minute observation during the school year 27 with a written summary or a final annual written evaluation based on the criteria and based on at 28 least two (2) observation periods during the school year, totaling at least 60 minutes without a 29 written summary of such observations being prepared. However, the long form evaluation process 30 shall be followed at least once every four (4) years and an employee or evaluator may request that 31 the long form evaluation process be conducted in any given school year. The short form evaluation 32 process may not be used as a basis for determining that an ESA/Support person’s work is 33 unsatisfactory under subsection (1) of this section nor as probable cause for non-renewal under RCW 34 28A.405.210. 36 The above process will be available to building administrators but shall not be used if a staff member 37 prefers the long form process. If an administrator would like to use the short form process, it is 38 agreed that: 39
View SourceView Similar (2)
Short-Form Evaluation Process. 28 After four (4) years of satisfactory long-form evaluations, the supervisor and employee 29 may mutually agree to participate in the short-form evaluation process. The short-form 30 evaluation (Appendix E-6) shall consist of: 32 1. One 30-minute observation with a written summary, or
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Short-Form Evaluation Process

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

  • GRIEVANCE REPORT FORM Grievance # School District Distribution of Form 1. Superintendent

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Escalation Process If Customer believes in good faith that Customer has not received quality or timely assistance in response to a support request or that Customer urgently need to communicate important support related business issues to Service Provider’s management, Customer may escalate the support request by contacting Service Provider and requesting that the support request be escalated to work with Customer to develop an action plan.

  • Application Process The employees wishing to enter into a job share arrangement will apply in writing to the Employer and forward a copy to the Union outlining the proposed commencement date of the job share, how the hours and days of work will be shared and how communication and continuity of work will be maintained. The Employer shall communicate a decision on a job share request in writing to the applicants. Applications to Job Sharing shall not be unreasonably denied.