Second Tier Screening Sample Clauses

Second Tier Screening. After the first tier screening was completed, the trustees conducted a second tier screening of the 14 alternatives listed above by applying the OPA criteria to select a restoration alternative. This final screening resulted in the identification of five alternatives and the selection of one restoration alternative to address injuries caused by the Mosquito Bay incident. The application of the OPA criteria to the 14 alternatives during the second tier screening criteria is shown in Table 5.1. Table 5.1 Results of the second tier screening conducted on the 14 potential restoration alternatives. (+) indicates a strong relationship or likely to occur between the project and that criterion, (0) indicates moderate, and (-) indicates a weak relationship or not likely to occur between the project and that criterion. Project OPA Criteria (as numbered in Section 5.2) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Considered further* Canal filling along SE Mosquito Bay 0 + + + + - Y Canal filling along E. Mosquito Bay 0 + + + + - Y Canal filling SW of Mosquito Island 0 + + + + - Y Shoreline Protection (using A-jacks) N of the inlet to Mosquito Bay 0 0 0 0 0 - N Project OPA Criteria (as numbered in Section 5.2) #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Considered further* Shoreline Protection (using articulated concrete mats) N of the inlet to Mosquito Bay 0 0 0 0 0 - N Canal mouth closure along SE Mosquito Bay 0 0 0 0 0 - N Canal mouth closure along E. Mosquito Bay 0 0 0 0 0 - N Canal mouth closure SW of Mosquito Island 0 0 0 0 0 - N Vegetative plantings along the North Shore of Lost Lake 0 0 - + + - N Pointe Aux Chenes Hydrologic Restoration 0 - 0 + + - N Four Mile Canal/ Bar Mouth 0 - 0 + + - N Grand Bayou Blue Dredge and Fill 0 0 + + + - Y Point Au Chiene WMA xxxxx creation 0 0 + + + - Y Plug canals cut through the E. bank of Bayou Terrebonne 0 - 0 0 0 - N *This is not an OPA criterion. Its purpose is to aid the reader in identifying the projects that emerged as a result of the second tier screening.