Repayment of Money Owed District Sample Clauses

Repayment of Money Owed District. 10.9.1 If monies are paid to a unit member in excess of the appropriate amount due the unit member, the unit member is liable and responsible for payment of the monies owed to the District. The unit member shall bring the overpayment to the attention of the District Payroll Department as soon as it is discovered by the unit member.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Repayment of Money Owed District. If monies are paid to an employee in excess of the appropriate amount due the employee, the employee is liable and responsible for repayment of the monies owed to the District. The employee shall bring the overpayment to the attention of the District Payroll Office as soon as it is discovered by the employee.

Related to Repayment of Money Owed District

  • Payment of Money to Province The Recipient will pay any money owing to the Province by cheque payable to the “Ontario Minister of Finance” and delivered to the Province as provided for in Schedule “B".

  • Payment of Monies Any other monies payable under this Agreement, unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, shall be paid by wire transfer.

  • Application of Moneys All moneys received by the Agent and/or the Security Trustee under or pursuant to any of the Security Documents and expressed to be applicable in accordance with the provisions of this clause 13.1 or in a manner determined in the Security Trustee’s or (as the case may be) the Agent’s discretion, shall be applied in the following manner:

  • Xxxxxxx Money (Security Deposit) 5.1 While submitting commercial bid, the BIDDER shall deposit an amount………. (to be specified in RFP) as Xxxxxxx Money/Security Deposit, with the BUYER through any of the following instruments:

  • County Obligations Tenant specifically acknowledges and agrees that County, and County Parties do not and shall not have any obligations with respect to the maintenance, alteration, improvement, demolition, replacement, addition or repair of any Improvements.

  • Recourse to Agencies or Courts of Competent Jurisdiction Notwithstanding Section 11.2, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of a Party to file a complaint with the FERC under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or with the PUCO under relevant provisions of the Legal Authorities. The Parties’ agreement under this Section 11.3 is without prejudice to any Party’s right to contest jurisdiction of the FERC or PUCO to which a complaint is brought.

  • CFR PART 200 Domestic Preferences for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stag through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Moreover, for purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe, aggregates such as concrete, class, including optical fiber, and lumber. Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that to the greatest extent practicable Vendor will provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Does vendor agree? Yes

  • 200 Domestic Preferences for Procurements As appropriate and to the extent consistent with law, the non-Federal entity should, to the greatest extent practicable under a Federal award, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this section must be included in all subawards including all contracts and purchase orders for work or products under this award. For purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Produced in the United States” means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stag through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Moreover, for purposes of 2 CFR Part 200.322, “Manufactured products” means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum, plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe, aggregates such as concrete, glass, including optical fiber, and lumber. Pursuant to the above, when federal funds are expended by ESC Region 8 and TIPS Members, Vendor certifies that to the greatest extent practicable Vendor will provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). Does vendor agree? Yes

  • Value for Money Each Candidate Scheme must demonstrate value for money i.e. the optimal use of resources to achieve the intended outcomes. The National Audit Office use three criteria to assess value for money:  economy – minimising the cost of resources used or required – spending less;  efficiency – the relationship between the outputs from goods or services and the resources to produce them – spending well; and  effectiveness – the relationship between the intended and actual results of public spending – spending wisely. In basic terms value for money is the degree to which benefits exceed costs and the use of HM Treasury’s Green Book and Business Case Appraisal process in assessed Candidate Schemes is expected to demonstrate the potential value of any scheme. The Candidate Scheme business case is also expected to refer, where appropriate, to guidance on value for money and other benefits specific to the nature of the proposed scheme, this will include demonstrating social return on investment and local multiplier benefits. The business case may also highlight how the schemes procurement might improve economic, social and environmental well-being of the region and how such improvements might be secured in its implementation. The Regional Cabinet when deciding on whether to support a Candidate Scheme will take a wide range of evidence into consideration in addition to the level of value for money. There may be occasions when, although the measure of value for money is low, due to the wider regional economic impacts on the Regional Economic Strategy targets, cost effectiveness, environmental and social impact, and leverage of additional funding the Candidate Scheme will be supported.

  • CALCULATION OF LOSS FOR SHORT SALE LOANS No Preceeding Loan Mod under Loss Share 1 Shared-Loss Month: May-09 2 Loan # 58776 3 RO # 542 4 Interest paid-to-date 7/31/08 5 Short Payoff Date 4/17/09 6 Note Interest rate 7.750% 7 Owner occupied? Yes If so: 8 Borrower current gross annual income 38,500 9 Estimated NPV of loan mod 200,000 10 Most recent BPO 380,000 11 Most recent BPO date 1/31/06 Short-Sale Loss calculation 12 Loan Principal balance 375,000 13 Accrued interest, limited to 90 days 7,266 14 Attorney's fees 0 15 Tax and insurance advances 0 16 3rd party fees due 2,800 17 Incentive to borrower 2,000 18 Gross balance recoverable by Purchaser 387,066 19 Amount accepted in Short-Sale 255,000 20 Hazard Insurance 0 21 Mortgage Insurance 0 22 Total Cash Recovery 255,000 23 Loss Amount 132,066 Exhibit 2c(2)

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.