Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review Sample Clauses

Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22 even though Subrecipient is not delegated the requirement under Section 104(g) of the HCD Act for environmental review, decision- making and action (see 24 CFR part 58) and is not delegated the Grantee’s responsibilities for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. 24 CFR 58.22 imposes limitations on activities pending clearance and specifically limits commitments of HUD funds or non-HUD funds by any participant in the development process before completion of the environmental review. A violation of this requirement may result in a prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the activity. If DEO has not issued an Authority to Use Grant Funds within 15 days of Subrecipient’s submission of the required documentation, DEO shall provide Subrecipient a written update regarding the status of the review process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. The Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22, which imposes limitations on activities pending clearance, and specifically limits commitments of HUD funds or non-HUD funds by any participant in the development process before completion of the environmental review. A violation of this requirement may result in a prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the activity. The Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22 even though the Subrecipient is not delegated the requirement under Section 104(g) of the HCD Act for environmental review, decision-making, and action (see 24 CFR part 58) and is not delegated the Subrecipient’s responsibilities for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. 24 CFR 58.22 imposes limitations on activities pending clearance, and specifically limits commitments of HUD funds or non-HUD funds by any participant in the development process before completion of the environmental review. A violation of this requirement may result in a prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the activity.
Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. The Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22, which imposes limitations on activities pending clearance, and specifically limits commitments of HUD funds or non-HUD funds by any participant in the development process before completion of the environmental review. A violation of this requirement may result in a prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the activity.
Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. The Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22 even though the Subrecipient is not delegated the requirement under Section 104(g) of the HCD Act for environmental review, decision- making, and action (see 24 CFR part 58) and is not delegated the Grantee’s responsibilities for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. 24 CFR 58.22 imposes limitations on activities pending clearance, and specifically limits commitments of HUD funds or non-HUD funds by any participant in the development process before completion of the environmental review. A violation of this requirement may result in a prohibition on the use of Federal funds for the activity.
Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. Subrecipient must comply with the limitations in 24 CFR 58.22 even though Subrecipient is not delegated the requirement under Section 104(g) of the HCD Act for environmental review, decision- making and action (see 24 CFR part 58) and is not delegated the Grantee’s responsibilities for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 52. 24
Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review. Recipients of CDBG-DR funds are required to comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) found at 24 CFR part 58 and complete an Environmental Review Record (ERR). Grantee is the Responsible Entity under 24 CFR part 58. No funds may be obligated or expended by Subrecipient until the environmental review procedures outlined in 24 CFR part 58 have been complied with. Full compliance with 24 CFR part 58 shall be confirmed by Grantee to Subrecipient in a Project-specific Award Letter (“Award Letter”) before funds may be obligated or expended with the exception of pre-award costs identified as described in Section 3.5.

Related to Prohibition on Choice Limiting Activities Prior to Environmental Review

  • No Restriction on Existing Examination and Investigative Authority That this Agreement shall in no way preclude any State Mortgage Regulator from exercising its examination or investigative authority authorized under the laws of the corresponding Participating State in the instance a determination is made wherein Respondent is found not to be adhering to the requirements of the Agreement, other than inadvertent and isolated errors that are promptly corrected by Respondent, or involving any unrelated matter not subject to the terms of this Agreement. The Parties agree that the failure of Respondent to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement with respect to a particular State shall be treated as a violation of an Order of the State and may be enforced as such. Moreover, Respondent acknowledges and agrees that this Agreement is only binding on the State Mortgage Regulators and not any other Local, State or Federal Agency, Department or Office.

  • Response/Compliance with Audit or Inspection Findings A. Grantee must act to ensure its and its Subcontractors’ compliance with all corrections necessary to address any finding of noncompliance with any law, regulation, audit requirement, or generally accepted accounting principle, or any other deficiency identified in any audit, review, or inspection of the Contract and the services and Deliverables provided. Any such correction will be at Grantee’s or its Subcontractor's sole expense. Whether Xxxxxxx's action corrects the noncompliance shall be solely the decision of the System Agency.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.