Prepublication Review Sample Clauses

Prepublication Review. Principal Investigator will provide Pfizer an opportunity to review any proposed publication or any other type of disclosure of the results of the Study (collectively, “Publication”) before it is submitted or otherwise disclosed. Pfizer will review for unprotected Inventions (see Section 14, Inventions) and may also provide comments on content. Principal Investigator will consider any such comments in good faith but is under no obligation to incorporate any Pfizer suggestions.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prepublication Review. A. The Parties anticipate that their employees may wish to publish technical developments and/or research findings generated in the course of this CRADA. On the other hand, the Parties recognize that an objective of this CRADA is to provide business advantages to the Participant. In order to reconcile publication and business concerns, the Parties agree to a review procedure as follows:
Prepublication Review. The Parties agree to secure prepublication approval from each other, which shall not be unreasonably withheld or denied beyond thirty (30) days.
Prepublication Review. Investigator will provide Sponsor an opportunity to review any proposed publication or any other type of disclosure of the results of the Study (collectively, “Publication”) before it is submitted or otherwise disclosed. Sponsor will review for unprotected Inventions and may also provide comments on content. Investigator will consider any such comments in good faith but is under no obligation to incorporate any Sponsor suggestions. a.
Prepublication Review. Neither Party may publish information generated in connection with work performed under the SLT Technical Support Services Agreement without the advance written approval of the other Party.
Prepublication Review. Institution and/or Principal Investigator, as právních prostředků nebo obou těchto prostředků nebrání CRO nebo společnosti Pfizer uplatnit své právo na okamžité ukončení Studie, pokud Poskytovatel nebo Hlavní zkoušející nezačne plnit své povinnosti. 14.
Prepublication Review. Principal Investigator will provide Pfizer an opportunity to review any proposed publication or any other type of disclosure of the results of the Study a/nebo poskytovatel, jakožto zamestnavatel hlavního zkoušejícího uplatňující práva ekonomické povahy hlavního zkoušejícího jako autora (dle situace), tímto postupují veškerá pševoditelná práva k duševnímu vlastnictví ve vztahu k veškerým vynálezům (jmenovite právo poskytovatele uplatňovat práva ekonomické povahy k vynálezům) na společnost Pfizer. Pokud povaha pšedmetných práv duševního vlastnictví zakazuje jejich postoupení nebo postoupení kterékoli jejich části výše popsaným způsobem, udeluje tímto hlavní zkoušející a/nebo poskytovatel (podle toho, co pšipadá v úvahu) společnosti Pfizer výslovnou, výlučnou, neodvolatelnou a bezplatnou licenci bez časového omezení k užívání a výkonu veškerých práv k duševnímu vlastnictví ve vztahu k vynálezům v rozsahu povoleném platnými zákony [pro veškeré obchodní účely, jak si společnost Pfizer bude pšát]. Bez ohledu na výše uvedené souhlasí tímto hlavní zkoušející a poskytovatel, že společnost Pfizer má právo udelovat sublicence nebo pševést licenci, která jí byla podle tohoto článku poskytnuta, tšetím stranám nebo licenci nevyužít. 14.3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Prepublication Review 

Related to Prepublication Review

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.

  • Protocol No action to coerce or censor or penalize any negotiation participant shall be made or implied by any other member as a result of participation in the negotiation process.

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Compensation Review The compensation of the Executive will be reviewed not less frequently than annually by the board of directors of the Company.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Publicity Review Subject to the further provisions of this Section, no Party shall originate any written publicity, news release, or other announcement or statement relating to this Agreement or to performance hereunder or the existence of an arrangement between the Parties (collectively, "Written Disclosure"), without the prior prompt review and written approval of the other, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section, any Party may make any public Written Disclosure it believes in good faith based upon the advice of counsel is required by applicable law or any listing or trading agreement concerning its publicly traded securities, provided that prior to making such Written Disclosure, the disclosing Party shall provide the other Party with a copy of the materials proposed to be disclosed and provide the receiving Party with an opportunity to promptly review the proposed Written Disclosure. To the extent that the receiving Party reasonably requests that any information in the materials proposed to be disclosed be deleted, the disclosing Party shall request confidential treatment of such information pursuant to Rule 406 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Rule 26b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as applicable (or any other applicable regulation relating to the confidential treatment of information), so that there be omitted from the materials that are publicly filed any information that the receiving Party reasonably requests to be deleted. The terms of this Agreement may also be disclosed to (i) government agencies where required by law, or (ii) Third Parties with the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, so long as such disclosure is made under a binder of confidentiality and so long as highly sensitive terms and conditions such as financial terms are extracted from the Agreement or not disclosed upon the request of the other Party. All Written Disclosures shall be factual and as brief as is reasonable under the circumstances. Upon request by either Party, the Parties agree to prepare a mutually agreed press release and question and answer document with respect to this Agreement. Each Party agrees that all Written Disclosures and oral statements relating hereto shall be consistent with the answers specified in such question and answer document.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.