ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. CAME ON THIS DAY for consideration of the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of all claims asserted between Plaintiff Single Touch Interactive, Inc. and Zoove Corporation in this case, and the Court being of the opinion that said motion should be GRANTED, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims, counterclaims, or causes of action asserted in this suit between Plaintiff Single Touch Interactive, Inc. and Defendant Zoove Corporation , are hereby dismissed with prejudice to the right of the parties to assert in the future any such claims. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. SIGNED this __ day of _____________ 2013. ______________________________________ EXHIBIT E STIPULATED MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT TO VACATE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN XXXX DIVISION XXXXXXXXXX LLP XXXXXX X. XXXXX (No. 127564) (xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx) 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxx 0000 Xxx Xxxxxxx, XX 00000 Tel: (000) 000-0000 POLSINELLI PC XXXXXX X.X. DAY (No. 186553) (xxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx) XXXXX X. XXXXX (No. 46757MO) (xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 000 X. 0xx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Xx. Xxxxx, XX 00000 Tel: (000) 000-0000 Fax: (000) 000-0000 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiff, v. ZOOVE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No.: 4:12-CV-00831-YGR MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION TO VACATE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 4:12-CV-00831-YGR Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Vacate Claim Construction Order Plaintiff Single Touch Interactive, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Zoove Corporation (“Defendant”) submit this Memorandum in support of their Joint Motion to Vacate the Claim Construction Order dated July 17, 2013 (Dkt. No. 60) and respectfully show the Court as follows:
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Pursuant to Rule 1.420(a) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the qui tam provisions of the Florida False Claims Act, Fla. Stat. § 68.081 et seq. (“FFCA”), the State of Florida, the Relator, Ven-A-Care of the Florida Keys, Inc. (the “Relator”), and Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Xxxxxx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the foregoing parties collectively, “Xxxxxx Parties”) (all of the forgoing parties together, the “Parties”) filed with this Court, a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Xxxxxx Parties and Motion for Order of Dismissal with Prejudice of the Xxxxxx Parties. Upon due consideration of the Stipulation and the Parties’ Settlement Agreement and Release and the Court’s determination that the Settlement Amount appears to the Court to be fair, adequate, and reasonable under all the circumstances, the Court hereby approves the Settlement. WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and Union Bank should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against Union Bank and all counterclaims made by Union Bank against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the agreement of Grace & Xxxxx Xxxxx, Inc. ("GNU"), to voluntarily dismiss its action with prejudice against The School Board of Broward County, Florida and on the stipulation of GNU and the School Board for each to bear their own costs and attorney's fees, the Court having reviewed the agreement and stipulation and being otherwise advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the action by GNU against the School Board is DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this day of February, 2014. Conformed copies to: Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, XX, Circuit Judge F. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx, Xx., Esq., Xxxxxxxxxx Law Firm, 000 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx. Xxxxx, #000, Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxx, XX 33401;xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx,xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Esq., Elder & Xxxxx, P.A., Bayview Executive Plaza, # 301, 0000 Xxxxxxxx Xxx., Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, XX 00000; xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx, xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx, xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx Seating Construction USA, Inc. d/b/a Seating Constructors, USA, Inc., 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxx, Xxxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS FOR STADIUM SEATING AT XXXXXXX HIGH SCHOOL, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that GRACE & XXXXX XXXXX, INC.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and Citigroup, Inc., Citibank, N.A., and Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. (collectively “Citi”) should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against Citi and all counterclaims made by Citi against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same, subject to the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement between the parties. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment as between LML Patent Corp. and Citi.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. In consideration of the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit among Plaintiff and Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. EXHIBIT “B” IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA M2 Global, LTD., ) Case No. 6:09-cv-1209-MSS-KRS ) Removed Case: Case No. 05-2009-CA030179
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. In consideration of the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit among Plaintiff and Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys’ fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them. Dated: , 2010.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinions that the Stipulated Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by LML Patent Corp and National City Bank should be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the above-entitled cause and all claims made by LML Patent Corp against National City Bank and all counterclaims made by National City Bank against LML Patent Corp therein are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to the re-filing of same. All costs and expenses relating to this litigation (including, but not limited to, attorneys’ fees and expert fees and expenses) shall be borne solely by the party incurring the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Settlement and License Agreement entered into by and between the parties. This is a final judgment. SIGNED this ____ day of _____________________, 2010
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court, having been advised by counsel that a settlement has been reached, dismisses this case with prejudice. This Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the settlement. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx United States District Judge
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The Court is of the opinion that the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice agreed to by Plaintiff LML Patent Corp (“LML”) and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”) should be GRANTED.
