Northern District of California. Civil Action No. 5:18-CV-4914-NC (DMR) 4 Plaintiffs X.X., J.B.A., M.G.S., and M.D.G.B. (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and 5 all Class Members, and Defendants U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”); Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”); Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx, XX, in his official capacity as 6 Director, USCIS; Xxxxx XxXxxxxxx, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, DHS; and 7 Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, in his official capacity as Director, USCIS National Benefits Center, (collectively, “Defendants”) by and through their attorneys, hereby enter into this Settlement 8 Agreement, entered into this 25th day of October, 2019, and effective upon the Effective Date defined below. Plaintiffs and Defendants are jointly referred to as the “Parties.”
Northern District of California. The contact information for counsel in the X’Xxxxxx matter is as follows: Xxxxxxx Xxxx-Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxx-Xxxxxxx, P.C., 000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, XX 00000, Telephone: (000) 000-0000, Fax: (000) 000-0000, email: xxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx.) o The mere existence of such class, collective, and/or representative lawsuits, however, does not mean that such lawsuits will ultimately succeed. But if you do agree to arbitration with Uber, you are agreeing in advance, except as otherwise provided, that you will not participate in and, therefore, will not seek to recover monetary or other relief under any such class, collective, and/or representative (non- PAGA) lawsuit. o However, as discussed above and except as provided below, if you agree to arbitration, you will not be precluded from bringing your claims against Uber in an individual arbitration proceeding. If successful on such claims, you could be awarded money or other relief by an arbitrator (subject to splitting the cost of arbitration as mentioned above). WHETHER TO AGREE TO ARBITRATION IS AN IMPORTANT BUSINESS DECISION. IT IS YOUR DECISION TO MAKE, AND YOU SHOULD NOT RELY SOLELY UPON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT AS IT IS NOT INTENDED TO CONTAIN A COMPLETE EXPLANATION OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF ARBITRATION. YOU SHOULD TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO CONDUCT FURTHER RESEARCH AND TO CONSULT WITH OTHERS — INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO AN ATTORNEY — REGARDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR DECISION, JUST AS YOU WOULD WHEN MAKING ANY OTHER IMPORTANT BUSINESS OR LIFE DECISION.
Northern District of California. As soon as practicable after the Settlement Date, R+F and the Xxxxx Plaintiffs will jointly move for dismissal with prejudice of the Xxxxx Action.
Northern District of California. XXXXX XXXX and XXXXXX XXXXXXX, individua lly and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and XXXXXX X. XXXXXXX, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants. ))))))))))))))) Case No. 4:20-cv-03454-HSG Xxx. Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx, Xx. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28
Northern District of California. 4 OAKLAND DIVISION 5 XXXX XXXXXX AND XXXX XXXXXX, individually and on behalf of all others 6 similarly situated, 7 Plaintiffs,
Northern District of California. In Re: Robinhood Outage Litigation Master File No. 3:20-cv-01626-JD CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT APPROVING CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 3:20-CV-01626-JD [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Northern District of California. SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION XXXXXXX XXXXXX, an individual and Michigan resident, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. No. C 18-05982 WHA (JSC) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Class 2 Action Settlement (“Motion”). Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of the class certified by the Court 3 on November 26, 2019, ECF No. 260, has entered into an Amended Settlement Agreement and 4 Release (“Settlement Agreement”) with Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), dated March 26, 5 2020. Capitalized terms herein shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Settlement 6 Agreement. 7 The Court, having reviewed the Motion, its accompanying memorandum, the Settlement 8 Agreement and exhibits thereto, and the file, xxxxxx finds that the Motion should be GRANTED.
