FMRI DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS Sample Clauses

FMRI DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS. Structural and functional MRI data were acquired at eight IMAGEN assessment sites with 3T MRI scanners of different manufacturers as described in Section 2.4.3. In the second level analysis (SPM-design: one-sample t-test) of anticipation large win vs. no win and feedback large win vs. no win the following covariates were added to the second-level model: dummy-coded centre effects for the eight centres, handedness (right/ambidextrous) and gender (see Figure 2 and Figure 3). To determine the overlap of activation patterns in the VS and OFC during reward anticipation and reward feedback, masks were created using WFU Pickatlas (Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 2004; Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 2003). The mask for the VS was based on (Yacubian et al., 2006) (xyz = ±15, 9, -9, radius of 9 mm) (xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx) whereas the mask for the OFC was based on the Automated Anatomical Labelling (AALs) (Tzourio-Xxxxxxx et al., 2002).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
FMRI DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS. Structural and functional MRI data were acquired at eight IMAGEN assessment sites with 3T MRI scanners of different manufacturers as described in Section 2.4.3. The second level whole brain analysis of gender effects in reward anticipation and reward feedback (design: two-sample t-test) included handedness (right/ambidextrous) and 7 dummy-coded centre covariates (see Figure 9 and Figure 10 for second-level models). The VS ROI was extracted based on previous research (Xxxxxxxx, et al., 2006) (xyz = ±15, 9, -9, radius of 9 mm) using Marsbar (xxxx://xxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx).

Related to FMRI DATA ACQUISITION AND ANALYSIS

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • FINANCIAL STATUS REPORTS (FSRS Except as otherwise provided, for contracts with categorical budgets, Grantee shall submit quarterly FSRs to System Agency by the last business day of the month following the end of each quarter for System Agency review and financial assessment. Grantee shall submit the final FSR no later than forty-five (45) calendar days following the end of the applicable term.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Financial Conditions Section 4.01. (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained a financial management system, including records and accounts, and prepare financial statements in a format acceptable to the Bank, adequate to reflect the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project and each Sub-project (including its cost and the benefits to be derived from it).

  • Background and Narrative of Budget Reductions 2. Assumptions Used in the Deficit Reduction Plan: - EBF and Estimated New Tier Funding: - Equal Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates: - Employee Salaries and Benefits: - Short and Long Term Borrowing: - Educational Impact: - Other Assumptions: - Has the district considered shared services or outsourcing (Ex: Transportation, Insurance) If yes please explain: ESTIMATED LIMITATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (School Districts Only) (For Local Use Only)

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.