Evaluation of λCON Sample Clauses

Evaluation of λCON. The evaluation judgment is similar to a standard big-step evaluation judgment except that its input ranges over intermediate terms and its output is a behavior. The judgment states that the evaluation of term t with initial store σ, constraint list ς, environment ρ, and context κ results in a final heap σr, constraint list ςr, and behavior b: κ, ρ € σ, ς, t ⇓ σr, ςr, b Figure 5.8 and 5.9 defines the standard evaluation rules for expressions e in λCON . The evaluation rules for expressions are mostly standard. Each rule for a composite expression evaluates exactly one sub-expression and then recursively invokes the evaluation judgment to continue. Once all sub-expressions are evaluated, the respective rule performs the desired operation. The corresponding straightforward error propagation rules are disjoint to the remaining rules because they fire only if an intermediate-term contains an error. Figure 5.10 defines the evaluation rules for intermediate terms with nested terms, and the rule set in Figure 5.11 defines error handling, which always propagates an error to the top level. | ∫ The rules Const, Var, and Undef are standard. Rule Op applies a primitive operation to its argument values. The extended set of objects requires to revisit primitive operations on values. Function v σ (Figure 5.12) first erases all contract monitors and sandbox wrappers from its argument values before it proceeds with the usual operation. This unwrapping makes proxies transparent with respect to primitive operations on locations. Rule Abs allocates a new function object consisting of a closure with the current environ- ment and rule New allocates a new native object based on the evaluated prototype. Function application, property lookup, and property assignment distinguish two cases: either the operation applies directly to a target object (non-proxy object) or it applies to a proxy. If the given reference is a non-proxy object, then the usual rules apply: App for function application, Get for property lookup, and Put for property assignment. The evaluation rules for the non-standard cases are given in Section 5.4.5 and Section 5.4.6. The rules Get, Get-Proto, and Get-Undef implement JavaScript’s lookup operation through prototype chains. Each object has an internal prototype property which links to another object or to a constant value, signaling the end of the chain. If a property is not contained in the object’s dictionary rule Get-Proto forwards the lookup to the prototy...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation of λCON

  • EVALUATION OF TEACHERS 1. All reports on the work of a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Evaluation of Contractor Performance of the Contractor under this Agreement will be evaluated. The evaluation shall be prepared on Contract/Contractor Evaluation Sheet (STD 4), and maintained in the Agreement file. For consultant agreements, a copy of the evaluation will be sent to the Department of General Services, Office of Legal Services, if it is negative and over $5,000.

  • Evaluation of Teaching 1. All reports on a teacher shall be in writing.

  • Evaluation of Students Acknowledging the District’s adopted grading system, the teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of a student. No grade or evaluation shall be changed except by the teacher with the approval of the building administrator.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be:

  • EVALUATION OF BIDS i) Bids submitted by the tenderer will be opened first and evaluated for fulfilling the Pre-qualification criteria and other conditions in NIT/Tender documents, based on documentary evidence submitted along with the offer.

  • EVALUATION OF OPTIONS The County shall evaluate bids for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price of the basic period. However, the evaluation of options shall not obligate the County to exercise the option(s).

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • Evaluation Plan The systematic blueprint detailing the evaluation aspects of the project.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.