Evaluation of Program Chair Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Program Chair. 9.2.3.1 All Program Chairs will be evaluated during each odd-numbered academic year of their terms of office with regard to the performance of their duties and responsibilities.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (24)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Program Chair. 23.3.1 All Program Chairs will be evaluated during each odd-numbered academic year of their terms of office with regard to the performance of their duties and responsibilities. 23.3.1 Amended by Sideletter effective 3/1/10 23.2.4 Added 10/14/08 1. Administrative Evaluation of Program Chair - All Program Chairs shall be evaluated by the administrator to whom he/she reports at least once per year and no later than one (1) month prior to the end of each Spring Semester in which he/she serves as Program Chair. An “Administrative Evaluation Form” will be completed by the administrator prior to meeting with the Program Chair. The Program Chair will be provided a copy of the evaluation form during the meeting. The Program Chair may submit a rebuttal statement within six (6) days of receiving the evaluation form and, if submitted, will be attached to the evaluation form and placed in his/her personnel file.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Program Chair

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Evaluation of Proposals 29.1 UNDP shall examine the Proposal to confirm that all terms and conditions under the UNDP General Terms and Conditions and Special Conditions have been accepted by the Proposer without any deviation or reservation.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • EVALUATION OF PROJECT BENEFITS The goal of this task is to report the benefits resulting from this project. The Recipient shall:

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.