Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counselors Sample Clauses

Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counselors. Evaluations and assessments of full-time counselors shall be the quality of activity, including keeping current in one’s field, within each of the categories listed below (Articles 7.3.1.1 – 7.3.1.5) except that the place of the DEC and department Chairperson shall be taken by the appropriate Director or Xxxx. All individuals and bodies evaluating counselors shall weight these categories in the order listed. Any special conditions in the member’s letter of appointment or subsequent extensions or modification of such appointment as provided in Article 4.7 shall be considered in the evaluation process for renewal, promotion or tenure. Prior to initiating the evaluation procedure, the Xxxx or Director shall consult with the counselor(s) to develop procedures for gathering information to be used.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Evaluation Criterion and Categories for Counselors

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • TESTING AND COMMISSIONING 24 Allow for a Lump Sum for testing and commissioning of the entire electrical installation, including the provision of Compliance Certificate. Item Carried to Collection R Section No. 4 Electrical Installation (Provisional) Bill No. 1 Electrical Installation COLLECTION Total Brought Forward from Page No. Carried to Final Summary 76 77 R Amount FINAL SUMMARY Section No Page No 1 Preliminaries 26 2 Alterations (Provisional) 30 3 External Works (Provisional) 73

  • Criteria for Evaluation Criteria for employee performance review shall be made available to the employee before the start of the evaluation period and shall remain unchanged during the evaluation period unless the employee is made aware of the changes.

  • Responsibility for Evaluation Within each school the Principal will be responsible for the evaluation of employees assigned to that school. Evaluation will be made by the Principal or a qualified administrator. An employee assigned to more than one school will be evaluated by the Principal of the school in which the employee is assigned for the greater amount of time, with input provided by the Principal of the other school. Any Principal or person charged with the responsibility of evaluation of employees may involve other staff and students in the process if acceptable to the certificated teacher being evaluated.

  • PROCEDURES AND/OR CRITERIA FOR COURSE ARTICULATION a. Complete the ROP Careers with Children course at Freedom High School with a grade of “B” or better.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.