Engagement Type and Objective Sample Clauses

Engagement Type and Objective. This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures regarding an independent report of factual findings on costs claimed under the Grant Agreement. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opinion and expresses no assurance. The European Commission derives its assurance by drawing its own conclusions from the factual findings reported by the Auditor on the Financial Statement and the payment request of the Beneficiary relating thereto. The Auditor shall include in its Report that no conflict of interest exists between it and the Beneficiary in establishing this Report, as well as the fee paid to the Auditor for providing the Report.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (22)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Engagement Type and Objective. This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures regarding an independent report of factual findings on methodology concerning the Grant Agreements. The objective of this Report is for the Auditor to present factual findings on methodology used by the Beneficiary to calculate costs in its Financial Statements for the actions financed by the Grant Agreements. The procedures to be carried out will enable the Commission to conclude on the existence of the Beneficiary's methodology and its suitability to ensure that costs claimed will be in compliance with the terms of the Grant Agreements. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opinion and expresses no assurance. The European Commission derives its assurance by drawing its own conclusions from the factual findings reported by the Auditor on the methodology of the Beneficiary. The Auditor shall include in its Report that no conflict of interest exists between it and the Beneficiary in establishing this Report, as well as the fee paid to the Auditor for providing the Report.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (15)
Engagement Type and Objective. This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures regarding an independent report of factual findings on costs incurred under the Grant Agreement. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opinion and expresses no assurance. The Blue Action Fund derives its assurance by drawing its own conclusions from the factual findings reported by the Auditor on the Financial Statement and the payment request of the Grantee relating thereto. The Auditor shall include in its Report that no conflict of interest exists between it and the Grantee in establishing this Report, as well as the fee paid to the Auditor for providing the Report.
Sample 1Sample 2See All (4)
Engagement Type and Objective. This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures regarding an independent auditor report of factual findings on costs claimed/declared [please select] under the grant agreement. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opinion and expresses no assurance.
Sample 1
Engagement Type and Objective. This expenditure verification is an engagement to perform certa- in agreed-upon procedures with regard to all the Progress Reports under the Grant Agreement that have been provided to CEB during the Review Period. The objective of this expenditure verification is for the Auditor to carry out the specific procedures listed in Annex 2A to these ToR and to submit to the PIU/Lead Institution a report of factual findings with regard to the specific verification procedu- res performed. Verification means that the Auditor examines the factual information in Progress Reports of the PIU/Lead Institution and compares it with the terms and conditions of (i) the Framework Agreement and (ii) the Grant Agreement. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opi- nion and expresses no assurance. CEB assesses for itself the factual findings reported by the Auditor and draws its own conclusions from these factual findings.
Sample 1
Engagement Type and Objective. This constitutes an engagement to perform specific agreed-upon procedures regarding an independent report of factual findings on costs claimed under the Grant Agreement. As this engagement is not an assurance engagement the Auditor does not provide an audit opinion and expresses no assurance. The IMI JU derives its assurance by drawing its own conclusions from the factual findings reported by the Auditor on the Financial Statement and the payment request of the Beneficiary relating thereto. The Auditor shall include in its Report that no conflict of interest exists between it and the Beneficiary in establishing this Report, as well as the fee paid to the Auditor for providing the Report.
Sample 1

Related to Engagement Type and Objective

  • Scope and Objectives 1. This Partnership Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement”) defines the rights and obligations of the Parties and sets forth the terms and conditions of their cooperation in the implementation of the Project.

  • Aims and Objectives 1.9.1 The aims and objectives of this Agreement are to:

  • Purpose and Objectives The purposes and objectives of this Agreement are:

  • Goals and Objectives The Parties acknowledge and agree that the specific goals and objectives of the Parties in entering into this Agreement are to:

  • BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The partnership proposed by the Cooperator was selected due to merit review evaluations from the 2017 Notice of Funding Opportunity P17AS00037. The Cooperator demonstrated expertise in disciplines and subject areas of relevance to cooperative research and training. The Cooperator met the program interests of NPS with expertise, facilities, experience, diversity of programs, and history of collaborative research projects. The Cooperator helps the NPS-CESU to meet its objectives to:  Provide research, technical assistance and education to NPS for land management, and research;  Develop a program of research, technical assistance and education that involves the biological, physical, social, and cultural sciences needed to address resources issues and interdisciplinary problem-solving at multiple scales and in an ecosystem context at the local, regional, and national level; and  Place special emphasis on the working collaboration among NPS, universities, and their related partner institutions. Title: Provide research, technical assistance and education for resource management and research The CESU network seeks to provide scientifically-based information on the nature and status of selected biological, physical, and cultural resources occurring within the parks in a form that increases its utility for making management decisions, conducting scientific research, educating the public, developing effective monitoring programs, and developing management strategies for resource protection. Studying the resources present in NPS parks benefits the Cooperator’s goal of advancing knowledge through scientific discovery, integration, application, and teaching, which lead toward a holistic understanding of our environmental and natural resources. The Cooperator is a public research university, sharing research, educational, and technological strengths with other institutions. Through inter-institutional collaboration, combined with the unique contributions of each constituent institution, the Cooperator strives to contribute substantially to the cultural, economic, environmental, scientific, social and technological advancement of the nation. The NPS expects there to be substantial involvement between itself and the Cooperator in carrying out the activities contemplated in this Agreement. The primary purpose of this study is not the acquisition of property or services for the direct benefit or use by the Federal Government, but rather to accomplish a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized the Legislative Authorities in ARTICLE II. This agreement fulfills the Public Purpose of support and economic stimulation for the following reasons:  Projects will engage recipients, partners, communities, and/or visitors in shared environmental stewardship.  Projects will promote greater public and private participation in historic preservation programs and activities. The project builds resource stewardship ethics in its participants.  The information, products and/or services identified or developed by projects will be shared through a variety of strategies to increase public awareness, knowledge and support for historic preservation and stewardship of the nation’s cultural and historical heritage.  Projects will support the Government’s objective to provide opportunities for youth to learn about the environment by spending time working on projects in National Parks. The NPS receives the indirect benefit of completing conservation projects.  Projects will motivate youth participants to become involved in the natural, cultural and /or historical resource protection of their communities and beyond.  Students gain “real world” or hands-on experience outside of the classroom of natural, cultural and/or historical resource projects.  The scientific community and/or researchers external to NPS gains by new knowledge provided through research and related results dissemination of natural, cultural and/or historical resource information.  Projects assist in the creation, promotion, facilitation, and/or improvement of the public’s understanding of natural, cultural, historic, recreational and other aspects of areas such as ecological conservation areas, and state and local parks. For performance under this cooperative agreement, the regulations set forth in 2 CFR, Part 200, supersedes OMB Circulars A–21 (2 CFR 220), A–87 (2 CFR 225), A–110, and A–122 (2 CFR 230); Circulars A–89, A–102, and A–133; and the guidance in Circular A–50 on Single Audit Act follow–up apply. The Cooperator shall adhere to 2 CFR, Part 200 in its entirety in addition to any terms and conditions of the master agreement not superseded by 2 CFR 200, as well as the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. In the event of a conflict between the original terms of the master agreement and 2 CFR, Part 200, relating to this task agreement, 2 CFR, Part 200 shall take precedence.

  • IRO Independence and Objectivity The IRO must perform the Claims Review in a professionally independent and objective fashion, as defined in the most recent Government Auditing Standards issued by the United States Government Accountability Office.

  • Agreement Objectives The parties agree that the objectives of the Agreement are to facilitate:

  • Project Objectives The Program consists of the projects described in Annex I (each a “Project” and collectively, the “Projects”). The objective of each of the Projects (each a “Project Objective” and collectively, the “Project Objectives”) is to:

  • Project Objective A description of the overall purpose and expected outputs and outcomes or results of the Loan Agreement, including significant deliverables and, if appropriate, units of measure.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Facilities Planning and Construction Constructability Manual. Identify and document project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of project goals, objectives.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.