Disputes over Products Sample Clauses

Disputes over Products. If NOVAVAX, after good faith consultation with KING, disputes any finding by KING that a Product is not an Acceptable Product, then representative samples of such Product shall be forwarded to a third party jointly selected by NOVAVAX and KING, in their reasonable discretion, for analysis, which analysis shall be performed in compliance with applicable FDA regulations and governmental regulations in the Territory for re-testing of pharmaceutical products. The findings of such third party regarding whether the Product was an Acceptable Product shall be binding upon the parties. The cost of such analysis by such third party shall be borne by the party whose findings differed from those generated by such third party.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Disputes over Products. 12 6.3 Replacement of Products that are not Acceptable Products.....12
Disputes over Products. If VSI, after good faith consultation with King, disputes any finding by King that the Products are Un-Acceptable Products, then representative samples of such Products shall be forwarded for analysis to an independent testing laboratory or other appropriate expert mutually acceptable to the Parties (the “Testing Laboratory”) for evaluation, which analysis shall be performed in compliance with applicable FDA regulations and governmental regulations for re-testing of medical devices and with reference to the Specifications. The Parties shall cooperate with the Testing Laboratory’s reasonable requests for assistance in connection with its evaluation
Disputes over Products. If Seller, after good faith consultation with Buyer, disputes any finding by Buyer that a Product is not an Acceptable Product, then representative samples of such Product shall be forwarded to an independent third party jointly selected by Seller and Buyer, in their reasonable discretion, for analysis, which analysis shall be performed in compliance with industry standards and applicable FDA regulations and governmental regulations for re-testing of pharmaceutical products. The findings of such third party regarding whether the Product was an Acceptable Product shall be binding upon the parties. The cost of such analysis by such third party shall be borne by the party whose determination of whether or not the Product was an Acceptable Product differed from such conclusion of such third party.

Related to Disputes over Products

  • New Products You agree to comply with NASD Notice to Members 5-26 recommending best practices for reviewing new products.

  • Product Orders All Product orders shall be submitted by the Operators to DISTRIBUTOR and shall specify the location of the Operator’s Stores, the type of Product, and the quantity desired. Operators may place orders electronically (“Electronic Orders”) or by telephoning or faxing DISTRIBUTOR’s customer service center in accordance with the guidelines detailed below. All shipment expenses from DISTRIBUTOR’s distribution center to the Operator’s location shall be at DISTRIBUTOR’s expense unless otherwise noted elsewhere in this Agreement. Product order guides will be provided by DISTRIBUTOR to the Operators monthly via DISTRIBUTOR’s website and with a hard copy delivered to each Store, with availability of such order guides to be made prior to the beginning of the month, but only after review and approval of the order guide by COMPANY. The order guides will be organized by Product categories and will include, among other things, the Product Sell Price (as defined herein), Product units and new Products. DISTRIBUTOR will assign one product code number to each stock-keeping unit (“SKU”) of each Product, which will be common throughout its entire distribution system and will be used on all documents such as order guides, invoices, monthly reports, etc. SKU’s, and, accordingly, the assigned product code number, must differ for equivalent Products supplied by different suppliers. DISTRIBUTOR will use its best efforts to utilize the existing TCBY product item numbers. Only Products approved for sale to its Operators by the COMPANY will be listed on this order guide. Electronic Orders will be placed via telephone modem or internet using DISTRIBUTOR’s automated order entry system. All orders are subject to the standard order cut-off time of 4:00 p.m. local time, one (1) day prior to their scheduled delivery day for Stores located in the states of Florida and Georgia and 4:00 p.m. local time. In no event will Electronic Orders be required more than two (2) days prior to the scheduled delivery day. Operators will be notified prior to the time of final order cut-off if a product is expected to be out of stock so that an alternative may be ordered, subject to the provisions of Section 3.02. Operators will have until 5:00 p.m. local time, one (1) day before their order shipping day to modify or add-on to their order. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Stores that do not place Electronic Orders and have scheduled delivery days of Monday in Florida and Georgia, must have their orders placed by 4 p.m. local time, on the preceding Friday. DISTRIBUTOR may schedule deliveries any day of the week. Where reasonably possible, DISTRIBUTOR will schedule ordering days and delivery days that are mutually agreed upon by and between DISTRIBUTOR and each Operator and will provide notice to the affected Operator at least fourteen (14) days before routing changes. On an exception basis, DISTRIBUTOR will consider shortening the permissible time frames for scheduled deliveries for those Operators that, given unique and compelling business needs, require the same. Operator will be notified of any Product shortages at the time of order placement or, in the case of an Electronic Order, one (1) day prior to the loading of the delivery truck.

  • Other Products After clinical or other evidence, provided in writing [***] to Company, demonstrating the practicality of a particular market or use within the LICENSED FIELD which is not being developed or commercialized by Company, Company shall either provide JHU with a reasonable development plan and start development or attempt to reasonably sublicense the particular market or use to a third party. If within six (6) months of such notification [***] Company has not initiated such development efforts or sublicensed that particular market or use, JHU may terminate this license for such particular market or use. This Paragraph shall not be applicable if Company reasonably demonstrates to JHU that commercializing such LICENSED PRODUCT(S) or LICENSED SERVICE(S) or granting such a sublicense in said market or use would have a potentially adverse commercial effect upon marketing or sales of the LICENSED PRODUCT(S) developed and being sold by Company.

  • Supply Agreements For a period of three years from the consummation of the IPO, Odetics shall not unilaterally terminate or assign its guarantee obligation with respect to any supply agreement pursuant to which it has guaranteed the performance by ATL of ATL's obligations, unless such suppliers have consented to the termination or assignment of such guarantee.

  • Borrower Products Except as described on Schedule 5.11, no Intellectual Property owned by Borrower or Borrower Product has been or is subject to any actual or, to the knowledge of Borrower, threatened litigation, proceeding (including any proceeding in the United States Patent and Trademark Office or any corresponding foreign office or agency) or outstanding decree, order, judgment, settlement agreement or stipulation that restricts in any manner Borrower’s use, transfer or licensing thereof or that may affect the validity, use or enforceability thereof. There is no decree, order, judgment, agreement, stipulation, arbitral award or other provision entered into in connection with any litigation or proceeding that obligates Borrower to grant licenses or ownership interest in any future Intellectual Property related to the operation or conduct of the business of Borrower or Borrower Products. Borrower has not received any written notice or claim, or, to the knowledge of Borrower, oral notice or claim, challenging or questioning Borrower’s ownership in any Intellectual Property (or written notice of any claim challenging or questioning the ownership in any licensed Intellectual Property of the owner thereof) or suggesting that any third party has any claim of legal or beneficial ownership with respect thereto nor, to Borrower’s knowledge, is there a reasonable basis for any such claim. Neither Borrower’s use of its Intellectual Property nor the production and sale of Borrower Products infringes the Intellectual Property or other rights of others.

  • Manufacturing Rights Manufacturing Rights will be governed by Attachment 6.

  • Manufacturing Agreement Each of the Sellers (as applicable) shall have executed and delivered to the Buyer the Manufacturing Agreement with respect to the portion of the Business conducted at the applicable Facility.

  • Products 1.1. The information (including but not limited to the quantity, rated hashrate, unit price (“Unit Price”), total price for one item (“Total Price (One Item)”), total price for all the items (“Total Purchase Price”) of Products to be purchased by Party B from Party A is as follows (“Products”):

  • Licensed Products Lessee will obtain no title to Licensed Products which will at all times remain the property of the owner of the Licensed Products. A license from the owner may be required and it is Lessee's responsibility to obtain any required license before the use of the Licensed Products. Lessee agrees to treat the Licensed Products as confidential information of the owner, to observe all copyright restrictions, and not to reproduce or sell the Licensed Products.

  • Supply Agreement Buyer shall have executed and delivered the Supply Agreement to the Company.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.