Change in Board Recommendation Sample Clauses

Change in Board Recommendation. (a) Subject to Section 5.12(b), neither the Company Board of Directors nor any committee thereof shall, or shall publicly propose to, withdraw, qualify, modify, change or amend in any manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser (including pursuant to the Schedule 14D-9 or any amendment thereto), the Company Recommendation or the approval by the Company Board of Directors of this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including the Offer and the Merger (a “Company Change in Recommendation”).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Change in Board Recommendation. The DRC Board has unanimously recommended that the DRC shareholders accept the Offer, tender their Shares to Purchaser pursuant to the Offer, and, to the extent applicable, adopt the Merger Agreement in accordance with the applicable provisions of Massachusetts law (the “Board Recommendation”). The DRC Board may at any time prior to the Acceptance Time, (i) make an Adverse Company Recommendation Change in response to an Intervening Event and/or a Superior Proposal or (ii) terminate the Merger Agreement and concurrently enter into a definitive agreement with respect to a Superior Proposal; provided, however, the Merger Agreement prohibits the DRC Board from taking any action described in the foregoing clauses (i) and (ii) unless (A) the DRC Board determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that (1) such Acquisition Proposal constitutes a Superior Proposal or (2) that an Intervening Event has occurred and, in either case, that failure to take such action would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable law, (B) DRC shall have continuously complied with its nonsolicitation obligations under the Merger Agreement, and, with respect to a termination of the Merger Agreement pursuant to the applicable termination provisions set forth therein, DRC shall have complied with all applicable termination provisions set forth in the Merger Agreement (including the payment of the specified termination fee and reimbursement for certain expenses) and (C) DRC promptly notifies Engility in writing, at least three (3) business days before taking such action, of such determination of the DRC Board and of its intention to effect an Adverse Company Recommendation Change in response to such Intervening Event or Superior Proposal, and shall have complied with its remaining nonsolicitation obligations under the Merger Agreement. Such notice in response to an Intervening Event shall specify in reasonable detail the facts underlying the decision by the DRC Board to take such action and during such three (3) business day period, DRC shall, if requested by Engility, engage in good faith negotiations with Engility to amend the Merger Agreement in such a manner that obviates the need for such Adverse Company Recommendation Change, in which case the DRC Board shall not take any action described in clauses (i) and (ii) above. Such notice in response to a Superior Proposal will attach a reasonably d...
Sample 1
Change in Board Recommendation. 90 Finish Line’s and JD Sports’ Shareholders’ Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Sample 1

Related to Change in Board Recommendation

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) The Company hereby consents to the Offer and represents, as of the date of this Agreement, that the Company Board, at a meeting duly called and held, has unanimously made the Company Board Recommendation. Subject in each case to Section 6.1(b), the Company hereby consents to the inclusion of a description of the Company Board Recommendation in the Offer Documents and, during the Pre-Closing Period, neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) (A) fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), or publicly propose to fail to make, withdraw (or modify or qualify in a manner adverse to Parent or Purchaser), the Company Board Recommendation or (B) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or publicly propose to approve, recommend, endorse or declare advisable, any Acquisition Proposal, (ii) fail to include the Company Board Recommendation in the Schedule 14D-9 when disseminated to the Company’s stockholders (any action described in clause (i) or (ii) being referred to as a “Company Adverse Change Recommendation”), (iii) publicly make any recommendation in connection with a tender offer or exchange offer (other than the Offer) other than a recommendation against such offer or (iv) approve, recommend or declare advisable, or propose to approve, recommend or declare advisable, or allow the Company to execute or enter into any Contract (other than an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal requiring, or reasonably expected to cause, the Company to abandon, terminate, delay or fail to consummate, or that would otherwise materially impede, interfere with or be inconsistent with, the Transactions.

  • Change in Board During any period of two (2) consecutive years (not including any period prior to the execution of this Agreement), individuals who at the beginning of such period constitute the Board, and any new director (other than a director designated by a person who has entered into an agreement with the Company to effect a transaction described in clause (i), (iii) or (iv) of this definition of Change in Control) whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then still in office who either were directors at the beginning of the period or whose election or nomination for election was previously so approved, cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board;

  • Change of Recommendation Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company’s Board of Directors may, if it concludes in good faith (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that the failure to take such action would be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, make an Adverse Recommendation Change; provided that prior to any such Adverse Recommendation Change, (A) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub prompt written notice advising them of (x) the decision of the Company’s Board of Directors to take such action and the reasons therefor and (y) in the event the decision relates to an Alternative Transaction Proposal, a summary of the material terms and conditions of the Alternative Transaction Proposal and other information requested to be provided with respect thereto pursuant to this Section 5.4, including the information required to be provided pursuant to Section 5.4(b) and (c), (B) the Company shall have given Parent and Merger Sub three (3) Business Days (the “Notice Period”) after delivery of each such notice to propose revisions to the terms of this Agreement (or make another proposal) and, during the Notice Period, the Company shall, and shall direct its financial advisors and outside legal advisors to, negotiate with Parent in good faith (to the extent Parent desires to negotiate) to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that, if applicable, such Alternative Transaction Proposal ceases to constitute (in the judgment of the Company’s Board of Directors, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors), a Superior Proposal or, if the Adverse Recommendation Change does not involve an Alternative Transaction Proposal, to make such adjustments in the terms and conditions of this Agreement so that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise not necessary, and (C) the Company’s Board of Directors shall have determined in good faith, after considering the results of such negotiations and giving effect to the proposals made by Parent and Merger Sub, if any, that such Alternative Transaction Proposal, if applicable, continues to constitute a Superior Proposal or that such Adverse Recommendation Change is otherwise still required; provided further that, (1) if during the Notice Period described in clause (B) of this paragraph any revisions are made to the Superior Proposal, if applicable, and the Company’s Board of Directors in its good faith judgment determines (after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal advisors) that such revisions are material (it being understood that any change in the purchase price or form of consideration in such Superior Proposal shall be deemed a material revision), the Company shall deliver a new written notice to Parent and shall comply with the requirements of this Section 5.4(d) with respect to such new written notice except that the new Notice Period shall be two (2) Business Days instead of three (3) Business Days and (2) in the event the Company’s Board of Directors does not make the determination referred to in clause (C) of this paragraph but thereafter determines to make an Adverse Recommendation Change pursuant to this Section 5.4(d), the procedures referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) above shall apply anew and shall also apply to any subsequent withdrawal, amendment or change.

  • Change in Board of Directors Individuals who, as of the date hereof, constitute the Board, and any new director whose election by the Board or nomination for election by the Company’s stockholders was approved by a vote of at least two thirds of the directors then still in office who were directors on the date hereof or whose election for nomination for election was previously so approved (collectively, the “Continuing Directors”), cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the members of the Board;

  • Change in Board Composition During any period of two consecutive years, individuals who constitute the Company’s Board of Directors at the beginning of the two-year period cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors; provided, however, that for purposes of this clause (iii), each director who is first elected by the board (or first nominated by the board for election by the stockholders) by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors who were directors at the beginning of the two-year period shall be deemed to have also been a director at the beginning of such period; or

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • No Change in Recommendation or Alternative Acquisition Agreement Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall:

  • Company Stockholder Approval The Company Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations The literature review (see Appendix C) indicates a range of buffer width recommendations for protecting the shade function. Based on the XXXXX curve reported in this section of the report, approximately 1 SPTH (estimated at 61 meters or 200 ft) will provide nearly 100 percent effectiveness of the buffer to protect the intertidal from desiccation, elevated temperatures, and other shade-related functions. Of course, in nonforested community types (e.g., prairie and grasslands) the shade function from overstory trees may be unattainable. To maximize the buffer’s effectiveness to provide the shade function, the following actions are recommended: • Avoid disturbance to native vegetation in riparian areas, especially nearer the water’s edge. • Retain, restore, and enhance mature trees and a multi-layered canopy and understory of native vegetation at sites that support these types of plant communities. • Ensure that riparian areas can be maintained in mature, native vegetation through time. • Prevent modifications to banks and bluffs (e.g., armoring) that could disrupt natural processes (such as soil creep, development of backshore and overhanging vegetation, recruitment of wood and other organic matter to riparian area including beaches and banks.) • Prohibit cutting and topping of trees and avoid “limbing” (selective branch cutting to enhance views) of trees for view corridors and other purposes within buffers.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.