Table 18 definition
Table 18. Average income over the last six months in FC
Table 18. Anticipated impacts of contextualised pathways in Sofia Informal carer (IFC) Social care provider (SCP) Health care provider (HCP) Third-sector care provider (TSCP)
Table 18. Hand contamination levels (es, L/hands) and frequency distributions (%) derived for (manual) open pour M&L methods using four container size categories ~, tank-top and induction bowl respectively Tank-top category 1 category 2 lower Upper P* lower upper P* 1 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 5 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 95 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 5 10 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 70 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 30 20 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 60 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 40 Induction bowl category 1 category 2 lower Upper P* lower upper P* 1 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 5 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 99 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 1 10 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 80 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 20 20 1,00E-06 1,00E-05 70 1,00E-05 2,00E-04 30 ^ Indicative ranges were derived from an analysis of hand contamination levels during a standard pouring procedure (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al 2000, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 1999; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2000, ▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2009). Indicative frequency distribution were derived from Glass et al (2009) Table 19: Whole body contamination levels (eopen pour) derived for (manual) open pour M&L methods using four container size categories, and total body exposure during use of mechanical transfer devices (emtd) Category Container size (L) Whole body contamination (excl. hands) after open pour1, eopen pour (l/whole body)^ Total body contamination after using mechanical transfer devices (MTD)2, emtd (l/total body)^ Lower Upper Mean Lower Upper Mean* Lower Upper 1 derived from whole body contamination (coveralls) after a standard pouring procedure (induction bowl). These values were also adopted for tank-top pour. Note: If raw data was not available for all combinations of methods and container sizes, values were adopted from other similar-sized container sizes 2 operator contamination based on different body parts depending on type of loading systems used. Measurements taken after one protocol of six different mechanical transfer devices including both induction hoppers and closed transfer systems (including volumes of 5l-25l) ^ Lower and upper ranges were derived using the mean values with a factor 0,1 and 10 respectively (as standard deviations could not be calculated from the studies) Note Derived from: eopen pour (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al 2000, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 1999, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2000; ▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2009) and emtd (▇▇▇▇▇ et al, 2009)
More Definitions of Table 18
Table 18. The Mozambican phase- out for SADC and SACU members
Table 18. Volvo CE derived data