– Water Quality Analysis and Water Treatment Option Evaluation Sample Clauses

– Water Quality Analysis and Water Treatment Option Evaluation. Surface water falls under stringent regulations imposed by the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDEP) intended to prevent waterborne microbiological pathogens from reaching drinking water supply. In general, surface water can be classified as very high in color, hardness but fresh as evidenced by low chloride levels. Surface water is also typically very high in total organic carbon (TOC) which must be significantly reduced based upon FDEP regulations. It is believed that the regulations will ultimately require TOC levels to be less than 2 mg/l in the future. A high level in hardness will require treatment since water of this hardness would not be acceptable as drinking water. Although not specifically measured, surface water is expected to be relatively high in suspended solids which must be removed for both drinking water purposes as well as prior to most other treatment processes. This Task includes reviewing existing and historical surface water quality data collected for the Cow Pen Slough canal as well as adjacent waterways including Copper Creek and the Myakka River (Xxxxxxxxx Canal) for the following parameters. Aluminum, Antimony, Arsenic, Barium, Beryllium, Cadmium, Chloride, Chromium, Copper, Cyanide, Fluoride, Iron, Lead, Manganese, Mercury, Nickel, Nitrate (as N), Nitrite (as N), Total Nox, Selenium, Silver, Sodium, Sulfate, Thallium, Zinc, Color, Odor, pH, TDS, Hardness, Total Coliforms, Fecal Coliforms, Giardia, Crytosporium, Total Organic Carbon If necessary, additional surface water monitoring will be recommended and performed under a separate task assignment. The COUNTY will request and provide water quality data available from the City of Bradenton. This Task will also involve identifying and evaluating water treatment processes most suitable to produce irrigation and potable drinking water. Each process deemed as a viable treatment technique will be described and evaluated relative to their effectiveness, cost of operation, capital cost, and ease of operation. All treatment processes generate a byproduct which requires disposal. Byproducts generated by each treatment process will also be identified and evaluated for disposal.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to – Water Quality Analysis and Water Treatment Option Evaluation

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Data Quality 4.1 Each party ensures that the shared Personal Data is accurate.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Power Quality Neither the facilities of Developer nor the facilities of Connecting Transmission Owner shall cause excessive voltage flicker nor introduce excessive distortion to the sinusoidal voltage or current waves as defined by ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, in accordance with IEEE Standard 519, or any applicable superseding electric industry standard. In the event of a conflict between ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, or any applicable superseding electric industry standard, ANSI Standard C84.1-1989, or the applicable superseding electric industry standard, shall control.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

  • Substance Abuse Treatment Information Substance abuse treatment information shall be maintained in compliance with 42 C.F.R. Part 2 if the Party or subcontractor(s) are Part 2 covered programs, or if substance abuse treatment information is received from a Part 2 covered program by the Party or subcontractor(s).

  • Using Student feedback in Educator Evaluation ESE will provide model contract language, direction and guidance on using student feedback in Educator Evaluation by June 30, 2013. Upon receiving this model contract language, direction and guidance, the parties agree to bargain with respect to this matter.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.