Transparency in Evaluation Sample Clauses

Transparency in Evaluation in the semester before an Employee becomes eligible for evaluation for promotion to PTF2 or PTF3 status, the Department Chair or Unit Supervisor shall notify the PTF of the pending evaluation in writing either electronically or by first class mail. This notification shall include a list of all materials that the Employee must submit. The notification must also establish the format of the evaluation and identify the criteria that will be used in evaluating the Employee. Once completed, the Evaluator, Department Chair, or Unit Head shall notify the Employee of the result in writing no later than 30 days after the evaluation. If the Employee fails the evaluation, the written notification must provide a list of the reasons for failure and what improvements the Employee needs to make in order to qualify for promotion in a second evaluation.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Transparency in Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.